Article 9, No Big Whoop Part I. THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING IS...

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

⚠️WARNING ⚠️HARD HAT AREA: THE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION OF THIS ARTICLE IS DONE, BUT UNTIL I SEE THE SUN—the macro realm—THERE MAY BE SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATIONS NEEDED IN THE MICRO REALM OF ARTICLE 9 THAT I COULD NOT FORESEE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE.

Every Coffee Talk Ever: Part 1

Topic List

Topic 1. Getting to know the Electromagnetic (“EM”) Spectrum: it’s like a universal currency system having different denominations of cash, except it has different denominations of radiation

Topic 2. Noticing Spectras on the loose in the universe and discussing the implications: free piles of money everywhere; unmetered power; a Funky Cold Medina, aka the Quantum of Light (“QOL”); and different naturally EMPTY PPs/3-d SheLLs expressing different artificial Wave-Particle Duality (“WPD”)

Topic 3. How SybiLL SAPs with EMPTY 3-d SheLLs get individual WPD and transform into artificial baby turtle-particles (“BTPs”) that can all mack-on each other, subject to the Hierarchy of Relativity of 3-d directions

Topic 4. 🎵 BTPs in motion, like emotion in motion: a magical potion, 1 would go anywhere, 2 meet up there and form a STRONG NUCLEAR BOMB BOND ❤️‍🩹 inside of an Atomic Turtle Meetball (“ATM” 🏧 )🎵So we collect some MOTION ANALYSIS Know-How to use in different meet-up scenes

Topic 5. The ATM Backbone: the First Art Official Strong Nuclear Bomb Bond ❤️‍🩹

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

Topic 1. Getting to know the Electromagnetic (EM) Spectrum: it’s like a universal cash currency having different denominations of cash, except it has different denominations of radiation

BY OBSERVATION, light (aka radiation) is comprised of a myriad of wave-lengths, collectively referred-to as the ELECTROMAGNETIC (EM) SPECTRUM.

Each wave-length of the EM Spectrum has a force-value, which is like the face-value of one denomination of a cash currency; the longest wave-length has the lowest force-value, so it’s like the least valuable coin, and the shortest wave-length has the highest face-value, so it’s like the most valuable bill.

This enables precise amounts of force to be created using different combinations of wave-lengths, just like precise amounts of money can be created using different denominations of cash.

End of Topic 1!

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

Topic 2. Noticing Spectras on the loose in the universe and discussing the implications: free piles of money everywhere; unmetered power; a Funky Cold Medina, aka the Quantum of Light (“QOL”); and different naturally EMPTY PPs/3-d SheLLs expressing different artificial Wave-Particle Duality (“WPD”)

Discrete wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum and combinations of wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum—“Spectras,” which are like piles of cash, large and small, that are made from various denominations of currency—can seemingly be *separated* from the EM Spectrum as-a-whole and appear “on their own” at different 3-d positions, flying here and there along straight lines in all directions throughout the universe.

And that’s no joke: you know how expensive and dirty power-generation can be, and the Spectras flying around don’t belong to anyone, so if someone could figure-out how to cheaply and cleanly collect even a tiny fraction of that universal currency, it would be like minting money!

But that is going to be impossible for anyone who subscribes to any old 👌 Boomer theory to figure-out how to do.

Begin VOCABULARY NOTES

The EM Spectrum is a reference to the entire range of wave-lengths of light, aka radiation, in the universe.

So I don’t want to use the term “spectrum” ambiguously, e.g., to refer to PORTIONS of the EM Spectrum. Instead, I am going to use the term Spectra to refer-to a quantity of wave-lengths (a wave-length or a combination of wave-lengths) of the EM Spectrum that is present at a specific 3-d position; the plural of Spectra is Spectras.

End of VOCABULARY NOTES

Some Spectras, such as RAINBOWS, are visible to our eyes, and some Spectras are invisible to our eyes.

Source: “Spectroscopy 101 - Types of Spectra[s] and Spectroscopy“

NOTE that what is called “EMISSION” behavior of EM wave-energy is actually an example of light acting-on matter (and more specifically, light is providing an INTERNAL TAXABLE RECEIVABLE to a 3-d SheLL), as we will discover in Topic 3, below.

So the TOEWC does have an EMISSION THEORY.

But the TOEWC does not have theories of OTHER EM WAVE BEHAVIORS (e.g., “reflection” or “absorption” or “refraction” or “polarization” or “diffraction” or “scattering”) to speak of, because IT HAS BEEN PROVEN beyond any LOGICAL (aka REASONABLE) doubt that light and matter have an Absolute-Relative relationship, which means that light can act-upon matter but matter cannot act-upon light.

RECALL from Article 3:

And of course a thing cannot be relative-to itself.

RECALL from Article 5, Chapter 5:

To repeat the logical deduction: the wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum are NOT relative-to each other!

And EMPIRICAL SCIENCE helpfully confirms the correctness of this deduction for us.

Check it out: DIFFERENT WAVE-LENGTHS of the EM Spectrum DO NOT INTERACT with each other inside of the universe, but rather, THEY PASS THROUGH EACH OTHER and SUPERIMPOSE ALONG THE SAME 3-d LINES, forming…wait for it…SPECTRAS on the loose in the universe at those 3-d locations!

In other words, DIFFERENT WAVE-LENGTHS OF THE EM SPECTRUM CO-EXIST IN THE SAME PLACE—they don’t REDUCE EACH OTHER TO NAUGHT, they form COMPOSITIONS of wave-lengths, aka SPECTRA—EVEN WHEN THEY ARE “CROSSING PATHS,” i.e., TRAVELING IN OPPOSING DIRECTIONS!

QUESTION: Is this PROOF that the wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum are NOT relative-to each other?

ANSWER: Yes! THE PROOF comes from the simple fact that *two things* CANNOT occupy the same position, and yet *two different wave-lengths* CAN occupy the same position—they can have *SUPERPOSITION*!—and what that MEANS is that two different wave-lengths are NOT REALLY TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, they are ONE THING, and one thing is NOT RELATIVE-TO ITSELF, by definition.

QUESTION: [*from the peanut gallery*]

That’s such a GREAT QUESTION!

Let’s unpack it—and ask it in a different way to be more specific—before we answer.

QUESTION: [*unpacked and re-asked*] If it’s TRUE that the wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum are NOT RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER, then why do DIFFERENT WAVE-LENGTHS of the EM Spectrum NOT INTERFERE with each other ALONG THE SAME LINES, and instead form SPECTRA via SUPERPOSITION when they are asked to co-exist at the same location while “passing through” each other (i.e., traveling in different directions), and yet THE SAME WAVE-LENGTHS of the EM Spectrum INTERFERE DESTRUCTIVELY with each other, RESULTING IN NO WAVE-LENGTHS REMAINING—PERMANENT NULLIFICATION! THE DESTROYED WAVE-LENGTHS DON’T POP-UP AGAIN AND GO ON THEIR WAYS!—when equal quantities of the same wave-lengths are asked to co-exist at the same location while “passing through” each other (i.e., traveling in opposing directions)???

ANSWER: Tone Who?!? That’s a Funky Cold Medina! And even though it obviously needs more cowbell, that Medina’s a monster!

Begin EXPLANATION OF THE FUNKY COLD MEDINA

We’ve got to explain PERMANENT DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between the same wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum traveling in opposite directions along the same line, and we can rest assured that the phenomenon of *SUPERPOSITION* proves that THE EXPLANATION IS NOT MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum!

We could SIMPLY NOTE that one wave-length of the EM Spectrum is “a specific quantity and quality of A SINGLE THING”—it’s a specific quantity (one) of a certain wave-length of the EM Spectrum—and logically, it’s impossible for A SINGLE THING to simultaneously: (1) HAVE a specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at a location (i.e., HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at a location); and (2) NOT HAVE that same specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at the same location (i.e., NOT HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at the same location.)

Right?

And that’s fine! But the Funky Cold Medina remains, because we’ve got to explain PERMANENT DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between the same wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum traveling in opposite directions along the same line!

Think about it: How can the Law of Conservation of Energy be satisfied if DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between opposite-direction identical EM wave-lengths is PERMANENT, not TEMPORARY??? WE CANNOT DESTROY EM ENERGY with our theory; we’ve got to explain: WHERE DO THE DESTROYED WAVE-LENGTHS GO???

QUESTION: Hmmm, that’s a tricky one, so before we hazard a guess, maybe we should check with MODERN SCIENCE to see if there’s already a logical explanation for PERMANENT DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE? How does modern science say that the Law of Conservation of Energy in satisfied in this situation?

ANSWER: Science says…”ABSORPTION.”

In other words, science says that atoms are absorbing wave-length-carrying photons in one direction, which has the effect of exciting an orbiting electron (causing the electron to jump into a higher orbit based-on how much force the wave-length(s) had), so that the excited electron gives the atom POTENTIAL to do something (work), and then when the work is done—or the work itself may simply be—the generation of “heat,” which is emitted from the atom by “jiggling” motion, brings the electron back to its original orbit and satisfies the Law of Conservation of Energy.

I know, I know, we already showed that TIME IS ABSOLUTE (see Article 5, Chapter 2), which means that the Law of Conservation of Energy has to be satisfied AT ALL TIMES, and therefore INTERNALLY “CARRYING ENERGY” from time-to-time is impossible, so therefore the “ABSORPTION” theory is nonsensical for that reason alone.

RECALL from Article 5, Chapter 2:

And don’t forget the SIMPLEST BACK IN BLACK FACT that we already know, to wit: the universe can’t be Eternal (as discussed, inter alia, in Article 3 and in Article 4, Chapter 5, the universe had had to be created by an Eternal Entity called God to solve the infinite regress problem of the first cause of motion), which means that the 3rd dimension is naturally EMPTY of mass/wave-energy—in other words, natural EMPTINESS is a FIXED QUALITY of the universe, ruling-out the possibility of “ABSORPTION” happening in the universe!—and indeed, we saw in Article 7 that PPs/3-d SheLLs are EMPTY, so therefore THEY CAN NEVER “HOLD” ANY MASS!

So we can CHUCK OUT modern science’s entire “ABSORPTION” theory of EM radiation, along with THE BOHR MODEL OF THE ATOM.

But we have yet to answer the Funky Cold Medina QUESTION:

How can the Law of Conservation of Energy be satisfied if DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between opposite-direction identical EM wave-lengths is PERMANENT, not TEMPORARY???

WE CANNOT DESTROY EM ENERGY with our theory; we’ve got to explain: WHERE DO THE DESTROYED WAVE-LENGTHS GO???

ANSWER: A single QUANTUM of Light (“QOL”) would make all things possible.

Picture this: an Eternal LUMP-SUM OF LIGHT, aka EM Spectrum, called the QOL; the QOL has MANY INTERNAL POSITIONS—the QOL is one thing having “thing-ness” at many locations—and in fact, wherever the QOL goes, there it is, meaning that the QOL can be go wherever it needs to go in Reality, then whenever the QOL goes somewhere, it’s got an INTERNAL POSITION there, IN SOME MEASURE, which—the measure of “how much QOL is at an INTERNAL POSITION at a given time”—is calculated in discrete EM wave-lengths and collections of different EM wave-lengths, aka a Spectra.

In other words, Spectras raise the specter of an ACCOUNTING issue that neither enlarges nor destroys the QOL.

Begin pause for Mini-Q&A

Mini-Q: Is the QOL CONSTANT? Or is the QOL CONSTANTLY GROWING? And if the QOL is GROWING, then WHERE IS THE ENERGY COMING FROM?

Mini-A: It’s both. The QOL is like a “fixed budget” that has a “surplus” built-in, and the budget covers all of its own expenses in every time period—meaning that spending by one part of the budget is a payment to another part of the budget—then after all expenses have been accounted-for, the budget SPITS OUT THE SURPLUS.

So now imagine that you “inherit” this sort of budget at birth—so you don’t “set it up,” it’s just “there”—and then ask yourself: are you on a “fixed budget” or is your budget constantly growing, because it is SPITTING OUT ANOTHER SURPLUS in every time period?

It’s both.

The SURPLUS isn’t coming from NOTHING—and there’s no ACCELERATION OF INCOME happening, either—the SURPLUS is coming from THE BUDGET WORKING AS TIME PASSES.

The mechanism of action of the surplus is TIME.

Some thing has to happen in TIME; it’s impossible for TIME TO PASS with NOTHING NEW HAPPENING.

SPITTING OUT THE SAME SURPLUS in every time period is what happens to the QOL.

End of pause for Mini-Q&A

The Internal Positions of the QOL are all “riding” on top of the 6-d Anchor Point—so this means that there are Internal Positions of the QOL along all of the ADL Backbones and along all of the 3-d lines inside of the universe (all of which 3-d lines are “riding” on top of the ADL Backbones, in such a manner that at every location along every 3-d line, there is a fixed Hierarchy of Relativity among 3-d directions; see Article 3)—and the wave-lengths of an individual Spectra at an Internal Position of the QOL are constantly updated at the speed of light.

In terms of what we’ve already deduced, we would now NOTE that we would expect to find an equal fraction of the QOL allotted to each Snowman of God. The fraction of the QOL allocated to each Snowman of God would include a number of sets of wave-lengths, and each set of wave-lengths would include all the wave-lengths in the EM Spectrum. ONE SET OF WAVE-LENGTHS in the EM Spectrum would be equal to one unit of mass. And as we’ve previously deduced (see Article 6), each of the three particles in the same Snowman of God constantly express the same Wave-Particle Duality, which is one unit of mass, i.e., one set of wave-lengths in the EM Spectrum. As we’ve also previously deduced, it takes two to make a thing go right, i.e., it takes two units of mass per particle to keep a Snowman of God operating perpetually.

RECALL from Article 4, Chapter 2:

We saw in Article 6 that one unit of mass could be allotted to each of the different “TRANSACTIONAL” INTERNAL POSITIONS in a Snowman of God; the different Transactional Internal Positions in a Snowman of God are illustrated in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram (see Article 6, STEP 10) and THE BIG BANG diagram (see Article 6, STEP 18) as locations where EM wave-energy is identified.

Each instance of wave-energy at a Transactional Internal Position in a Snowman of God is a Spectra comprising one unit of mass, i.e., one set of wave-lengths.

No big whoop.

In that manner, there would be NO VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY when we didn’t have ABSORPTION to explain DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between the same EM wave-lengths traveling in opposite directions along the same line, because (and here I quote myself from above):

“We could SIMPLY NOTE that one wave-length of the EM Spectrum is ‘a specific quantity and quality of A SINGLE THING’—it’s a specific quantity (one) of a certain wave-length of the EM Spectrum—and logically, it’s impossible for A SINGLE THING to simultaneously: (1) HAVE a specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at a location (i.e., HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at a location); and (2) NOT HAVE that same specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at the same location (i.e., NOT HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at the same location.)”

QUESTION: Yes, but A THING CANNOT BE RELATIVE-TO ITSELF—and therefore A THING CANNOT DESTROY ITSELF—so what, exactly, is the mechanism of action that causes DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE?

ANSWER: RECALL from Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 3:

QUESTION: OK fine, but that conclusion does not tell us anything about HOW THIS PARTICULAR LEGAL LOOP-HOLE OPERATES IN REALITY; we still need to know: THROUGH WHAT “TRAP DOORS”—to what ETERNAL INTERNAL POSITIONS—DO THE DESTRUCTIVELY INTERFERING WAVE-LENGTHS GO in the QOL, by operation of Law?

ANSWER: By operation of Law, every wave-length subject to destructive interference in the universe would have to be returned to an Eternal Internal Position in the Funky Cold Medina, aka the QOL (that means a Transactional Internal Position in a Snowman of God), which is always going to be the OPEN DOOR through which 4-d Space—all un-recycled Eternally-burning radioactive waste 🔥—is RE-LOCATED INTO INFINITE OBLIVION in the 4-d Absolute Forward direction.

End of EXPLANATION OF THE FUNKY COLD MEDINA

End of Topic 2!

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

Topic 3. How naturally EMPTY PPs/3-d SheLLs get individual WPD and transform into artificial baby turtle-particles (BTPs) that can all mack-on each other, subject to the Hierarchy of Relativity of 3-d directions

One thing we know for certain—by observation—is that Spectras we observe in the universe are NOT ALL THE SAME.

Another thing we know to a logical certainty—by deduction (see Article 7)—is that THERE IS ONLY ONE TYPE OF SUB-ATOMIC PARTICLE (“SAP”) IN THE UNIVERSE, to wit: a SybiLL SAP, which is one part 4-d LL and one part 3-d PP having an EMPTY 3-d SheLL extending, via the 423DCTCC, into the universe.

So therefore we must conclude that THE EM SPECTRUM IS PARCELED-OUT IN DIFFERENT MEASURES AMONGST NATURALLY-EMPTY 3-d SheLLs IN A MANNER THAT ENABLES EACH 3-d SheLL TO EMIT A SPECTRA (a combination of different wave-lengths of the QOL) AS AN EXPRESSION OF 3-d WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY (“WPD”).

And NOW I’VE GOT TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF EXPLAINING HOW, otherwise I cannot claim that the TOEWC states a valid theory of motion!

RECALL from the Introduction to Article 4:

Continue to RECOLLECT:

Air Traffic Controller: “Hurry, Hurry”

Now we can RELAX, because WE’RE FINALLY READY to show HOW, in THREE EASY STEPS, an EMPTY 3-d SheLL can be CONSTANTLY (every instant) TRANSFORMED into a TAX-PAYING TURTLE-PARTICLE—a BABY TURTLE-PARTICLE, aka BTP, we’re going to call it, because it’s an offspring of an Eternal 4-d LL turtle-particle—with its own internal (albeit artificial) 3-d Wave-Particle Duality (WPD)!

The results are going to be amazing and diverse, because UNLIKE Eternal turtle-particles in the Snowman of the God—which are NOT RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER—all BTPs have a MUTUALLY-RELATIVE relationship, subject only to the Hierarchy of Relativity of 3-d directions.

Let’s go!

BTP WPD Glow-Up Step 1. A 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 is skimmed by the 6-d COM Tongue, aka 6DCT, at the bottom of a Lumeyne, aka LL, within a Snowman of God.

The 4-d Spectra Assembly is skimmed from 4-d Space, which is Eternally being dumped out the open door at the Transactional Internal Position of the QOL above the Lumeyne—the 4-d Absolute Forward direction along the Lumeyne’s ADL—in each Snowman of God.

Even more specifically, the 4-d Spectra Assembly is skimmed from what we are going to call the “The 4-d Space River Spectrum of Eternally-Burning Radioactive Waste” 🔥, or simply the “The 4-d Space River Spectrum” 🔥, which is a reference to EITHER:

(1) the one unit of mass, Ef(OPPFt), which is one unit of 4-d Space—a dumped tax payment/tax-free gift in a Snowman of God—generated by an UPSIDE-DOWN Lumeyne upon receipt of a Moving Service from a Timeyne, as shown in the following diagram from Article 6, STEP 11A:

—OR—

(2) the one unit of mass, Ef(OPPFg), which is one unit of 4-d Space—a dumped tax payment/tax-free gift in a Snowman of God—made by an UPSIDE-UP Lumeyne upon receipt of a Moving Service from a Gravityne, as shown in the following diagram from Article 6, STEP 19A:

BUT NOT BOTH.

To repeat the key information: there is a distinction between:

(a) 4-d Space, in general (as discussed in Article 6, 4-d Space, in general, is a Lumeyne-generated tax payment/tax-free gift in a Snowman of God);

and

(b) the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥, which we’re defining now as being the source of the 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 skimmed by the Timeyne’s 6DCT for the purpose of constantly giving an EMPTY 3-d SheLL its own individual 3-d WPD.

And again, the distinction is this: the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥 is either Ef(OPPFt) from the UPSIDE-DOWN Lumeyne, or Ef(OPPFg) from the UPSIDE-UP Lumeyne, but not both; the reason why it can’t be both is because there’s never a time when both Ef(OPPFt) and Ef(OPPFg) are simultaneously in an Internal Position to be ACCESSED by the Timeyne’s 6DCT, which has the job of skimming the 4-d Spectra Assembly from the 4-d Space River Spectrum.

Stay with me now to verify (with continuing reference to the above Lumeyne diagrams from Article 6, STEP 11A and STEP 19A, respectively):

whenever the Lumeyne is UPSIDE-DOWN, Ef(OPPFt) is in a position to be REJECTED by the Timeyne—via the 6DCT at the bottom of the Lumeyne—as a TAX-FREE GIFT;

and

whenever the Lumeyne is UPSIDE-UP, Ef(OPPFg) is in a position to be REJECTED by the Timeyne—via the 6DCT at the bottom of the Lumeyne—as a TAX-FREE GIFT.

The point is that we have shown that THE 6DCT OF THE TIMEYNE in a each Snowman of God HAS A PERPETUAL OPPORTUNITY to SKIM some or all of the wave-lengths in one unit of mass of the QOL (one set of wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum)—and in particular, the 6DCT can skim a 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 from the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥at the Transactional Internal Position above the Lumeyne in the 4-d Absolute Forward direction along the ADL Backbone—AND DIVERT the 4-d Spectra Assembly to an AN ALTERNATE INTERNAL POSITION ALONG THE 6DCT (the Alternate Internal Position is discussed in Glow-Up Step 2, below), BEFORE that particular Eternally-burning radioactive waste is DUMPED INTO INFINITE OBLIVION.

BTP WPD Glow-Up Step 2. The 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 is UP-CYCLED (UPLOADED, in fact) to an Alternate Internal Position (“AIP”) of the QOL inside of the 3-d SheLL, where it becomes an artificial 3-d “tributary” of the 4-d Space River Spectrum (the “3-d WOPR Stream Spectra” 🐳, let’s call it), where it is experienced by the 3-d SheLL as a mass deposit emanating from the AIP and heading in the direction on the 3-d SheLL Compass in which the 423DCTCC is being steered.

The 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥—minus the wave-lengths in the 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 that were diverted to the AIP to become the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳—continues to be dumped, as 4-d Space, into infinite oblivion in the 4-d Absolute Forward Direction along the ADL Backbone.

QUESTION: Is the EM Spectrum in a Snowman of God the same as the EM Spectrum in the universe?

ANSWER: Not necessarily, but it is a valid assumption to make.

QUESTION: How does the 6DCT know which wave-lengths—and the exact quantities of those wave-lengths—to skim from the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥 to create the 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 that is UP-LOADED to the AIP, becoming the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 mass deposit (“md”)?

ANSWER: A general-purpose “Universal O/S” that includes a “BTP WPD Management” function could be installed in the 6-d COM Segment of every SybiLL SAP to programmatically implement the three-step BTP WPD Glow-Up process.

This conclusion isn’t mere speculation, because we ALREADY KNOW that a Consciousness APP (“CAPP”), aka Personal O/S, is NECESSARY, NOT OPTIONAL, to enable autonomous motion of the COM of a sentient being.

RECALL from Article 8:

Consciousness is the cause of matter, not vice-versa.

Returning to the discussion of BTP WPD Glow-Up Step 2, the 3-d SheLL begins having the EXPERIENCE of the *internal* force of mass—the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 md emanating from the AIP—in the direction on the 3-d SheLL Compass in which the 423DCTCC is being steered.

As discussed in Article 7, there are TWO WAYS TO STEER THE 423DCTCC:

(A) FORCELESS STEERING via 3-d Mindful Stretching, which puts The Squeeze on the 6DCT at the TM particle/COM attachment position in the 6-d COM Segment, causing the head of the TM to tilt in The Squeeze direction and thereby apply Ft along the LADL in that direction (thereby causing the LADL of the LL and the 423DCTCC in the 3-d SheLL to follow like tipping dominoes);

and

(B) FORCEFUL STEERING via COLLISION, with a Moving Service Provider Boinking the 423DCTCC inside of a Moving Service Recipient’s 3-d SheLL, and having the effect of putting The Squeeze on the PP6DCT in the Boinked 423DCTCC, and thereby *possibly* causing the 3-d SheLL to TILT in a new direction by passing-on The Squeeze to the 6DCT at the bottom of TM particle/COM attachment position (at which juncture it would be as if FORCELESS STEERING was occurring), but only if the PP/3-d SheLL is already heading in a 3-d sideways direction, aka 3-d EXIT RAMP direction, i.e., the PP/3-d SheLL is NOT in the 3-d Backbone Orientation heading in either the 3-d Up direction or the 3-d Down direction along a 3DADL, because in that case, the 3-d Backbone Orientation and the 3-d EXIT RAMP direction of the Moving Service have an Absolute-Relative relationship, with the direction of the Moving Service being RELATIVE-TO the 3-d Backbone Orientation but not vice-versa, which means that the Moving Service is INEFFECTIVE TO CHANGE THE 3-d BACKBONE ORIENTATION (although we must keep in mind that in theory, it would be possible for FORCEFUL STEERING to cause a PP/3-d SheLL in the 3-d Backbone Orientation to ROTATE around a 3DADL or to MOVE UP OR DOWN along a 3DADL, because those movements would not require CHANGING DIRECTIONS—leaving the 3-d Backbone Orientation—on the SheLL Compass.)

In both cases (A) and (B), we NOTICE that the 423DCTCC is ONLY TRULY STEERABLE VIA THE 6DCT at the TM particle/COM attachment position in the 6-d COM Segment, and that means in the direction on the TM Particle Compass in which the Timeyne (“TM”) is applying its physical force, Ft, along the LADL (RECALL that the LADL is physically-implemented by the 6DCT, i.e., the 6DCT is the needle of the TM Particle Compass.)

So 423DCTCC STEERING MANAGEMENT could also be performed programmatically, via the Universal O/S installed in the 6-d COM Segment.

And even if a Moving Service Recipient PP/3-d SheLL is in the 3-d Backbone Orientation—and therefore the PP6DCT part of the 423DCTCC cannot be FORCEFULLY STEERED via BOINKING by an incoming mass deposit from a Moving Service Provider—the Universal O/S could still instruct BTP WPD Management to UPLOAD the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 to the AIP at the direction on the SheLL Compass in which NET BOINKING had been experienced, and the PP6DCT could simply “hold onto” the BUNCHING (aka The Squeeze put on the PP6DCT) caused by the BOINKING (instead of passing The Squeeze on to the 6DCT at the TM particle/COM attachment position in the 6-d COM Segment), to enable The Squeeze to be RELEASED PROGRAMMATICALLY *without* TILTING the 423DCTCC, but *with* the necessary assistance of DIRECTIONAL THRUST that would automatically be generated when the 3-d SheLL made a tax payment on the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra md (as discussed in BTP WPD Glow-Up Step 3, below), by turning the md around and THRUSTING IT OUT of the opposite side of the 3-d SheLL.

Now let’s diagrammatically envision the 6DCT’s skimming of the 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 from the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥, and the 6DCT’s UPLOADING of the 4-d Spectra Assembly to the AIP inside of the 3-d SheLL, where it becomes the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 md.

The diagramming task will be easy if we begin with some REASSURING REVIEW of what we already know.

RECALL from Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 3:

Now we can diagrammatically envision the 6DCT’s skimming of the 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 from the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥, and the 6DCT’s UPLOADING of the 4-d Spectra Assembly to the AIP inside of the 3-d SheLL, where it becomes the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 md.

Next, let’s zoom-in on an EMPTY PP/3-d SheLL, which we envision as a spherical SheLL Compass, with the 423DCTCC being the compass needle (physically-implemented by the 4DCT-cum-PP4DCT and the 6DCT-cum-PP6DCT) pointing to a certain 3-d direction on the SheLL Compass.

We see that unless the PP/3-d SheLL is in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, the direction on the SheLL Compass in which the 423DCTCC is pointing inside of the 3-d SheLL will correspond to BOTH the direction in which 4-d FfSet 🧨 is being applied by the PP4DCT, AND the direction in which the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra is deposited (at the AIP of the QOL) at the tip of the PP6DCT part of the 423DCTCC, which is now poised to become the direction of the 3-d SheLL’s VERY OWN 3-d PHYSICAL FORCE!

Whew!

We’re almost done!

BTP WPD Glow-Up Step 3. According to the TPTPTP, the 3-d SheLL *experiences* a Taxable Receivable—the internal force of 3-d mass (the WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 mass deposit, in fact) at the AIP, in the direction in which the 423DCTCC is being steered—and makes a tax payment in the form of OPP wave-energy to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion, by turning the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 md around and thrusting it out of the opposite side of the 3-d SheLL, 180-degrees from the AIP, so that the thrust of the tax payment causes the 3-d SheLL to apply an equivalent amount of physical force in the AIP direction on the 3-d SheLL Compass, with the THRUST wave-energy and the physical force together comprising WPD that the BTP can GO! work with (for example, to become part of an ATM), forever rinsing and repeating the three-step GLOW-UP process every instant.

That’s not much new material to unpack, but we could iron-out a few old concepts in this new context.

We NOTICE that the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra could not be counted as a TAX-FREE GIFT to the 3-d SheLL, because IT IS PHYSICALLY-IMPOSSIBLE to receive a 3-d tax-free gift INTERNALLY.

We ALSO NOTICE that this situation harkens back Article 4, Chapter 2, when we were “UNPACKING the #1 Physics Issue In Reality: The Non-Existent Beginning of Mass, The Wave-Particle Duality Theory of Perpetual Motion, from (A) to (J)”.

What we are seeing NOW is A PARTIAL RE-RUN OF THE UNPACKING, in the context of a PP/3-d SheLL EXPERIENCING THE BEGINNING OF MASS and thereby BECOMING A PARTY to the Wave-Particle Duality Theory of Perpetual Motion:

🥳🎉Party on, dude!

The 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳 is causing the 3-d SheLL to internally *EXPERIENCE* physical force, which is a great definition of PARTICLE MASS, to wit: “What a particle CONTAINS upon the *EXPERIENCE* of physical force”.

Now we must REMEMBER that every 3-d SheLL is naturally EMPTY, and therefore IT IS PHYSICALLY-IMPOSSIBLE for the 3-d SheLL to “CONTAIN” any mass, so therefore the Law of Conservation of Energy for EMPTY 3-d SheLLs is demanding the IMMEDIATE RELEASE of the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra.

“Vacation” movie NOTE: I’m not laughing at the animal cruelty scene, I’m laughing at the cruel animals who are pretending to GAF (or pretending to DGAF; it’s impossible to know when a poseur is off-duty) about suffering injustice and death.

All we have to verify is THE RELEASE DIRECTION of the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra.

And that’s easy to verify, because again: TO REMAIN WITHIN THE REALM OF PHYSICAL POSSIBLITY, the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra must be INTERNALLY *EXPERIENCED* by the 3-d SheLL as a PHYSICAL FORCE OF MASS (applied in the direction on the SheLL Compass in which the 423DCTCC is being STEERED), which demands an immediate equal-magnitude-but-opposite-direction reaction—A TAX PAYMENT—in the form OPP wave-energy being THRUST OUT of the 3-d SheLL to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion, which informs us that the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra will be TURNED AROUND and THRUST OUT of the other side of the 3-d SheLL (180-degrees from the AIP direction in which the 423DCTCC is being STEERED),

To repeat what is happening to the PP/3-d SheLL:

the PP/3-d SheLL is first *EXPERIENCING* the physical force of MASS—the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳—in the direction of the AIP on the SheLL Compass, and that is CAUSING the PP/3-d SHeLL to *APPLY* the physical force of MASS that it first *EXPERIENCED* by TURNING THE 3-d WOPR STREAM SPECTRA AROUND AND THRUSTING IT OUT THE OTHER SIDE of the 3-d SheLL (180-degrees from the AIP, i.e., the direction in which the 423DCTCC is being STEERED) as OPP WAVE-ENERGY, aka a TAX PAYMENT, TO SATISFY NEWTON’S THIRD LAW OF MOTION,

and at the same time (which means *in the same instant*) as THE OLD MASS (the turned-around 3-d WOPR STREAM SPECTRA that becomes the OPP wave-energy TAX PAYMENT) is shooting out of the PP/3-d SheLL, the PP/3-d SheLL is having the *EXPERIENCE* of the physical force of NEW MASS (A NEW 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 is UPLOADED to the AIL to become THE NEW WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳.)

And we NOTICE that it would be theoretically possible for the NEW MASS (the new 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra) to have a DIFFERENT MAGNITUDE—meaning an increased or decreased quantity of the same wave-lengths—as compared to the OLD MASS.

This would enable a BTP’s “NORMAL WPD” TO BE TEMPORARILY INCREASED; and this theoretical possibility is necessary, not optional, because what has always been missing from Newton’s Laws of Motion is AN EXPLANATION of where every body gets its VELOCITY.

And that’s it!

BTP WPD Glow-Up ta-da, ta-done: in THREE EASY GLOW-UP STEPS, the 6DCT has PARCELED-OUT THE EM SPECTRUM IN DIFFERENT MEASURES AMONGST NATURALLY-EMPTY 3-d SheLLs IN A MANNER THAT ENABLES EACH 3-d SheLL TO EMIT A SPECTRA (a combination of different wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum) AS AN EXPRESSION OF 3-d WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY—

a more or less big physical force of mass and an equivalent EM wave-energy expressed in opposite directions along the same 3-d line—

out of what would otherwise have been WASTED 4-d SPACE, by simply SKIMMING, UPLOADING, and RE-PURPOSING some 4-d wave-lengths into 3-d to put “meat” (the 3-d WOPR Stream Spectra 🐳) on the “bones” of the naturally EMPTY 3-d SheLLs, TRANSFORMING them into artificial tax-paying baby turtle-particles (BTPs) with their own WPD.

Now all we need to complete the BTP WPD GLOW-UP is some new vocabulary so that we can clearly reference the two aspects of a BTP’s Wave-Particle Duality expressed in opposite directions along the same line.

Let’s refer-to the BTP’s applied physical force of mass as “Fmack” (because WPD is enabling the BTP to MACK-ON other BTPs by APPLYING the more or less BIG MACK ATTACK FORCE of mass), and let’s refer-to the BTP’s equivalent amount of EM wave-energy as “Emack.”

QUESTION: Why does a BTP’s WPD cause the BTP to move LINEARLY, instead of ROTATING in-place, like an Eternal particle’s expression of its own internal force of mass does, as discussed in Article 4, Chapter 4?

RECALL from Article 4, Chapter 4:

ANSWER: Unlike an Eternal particle—which is a MASS-OWNER, i.e., CONTAINS MASS, and therefore cannot TAKE ITSELF (its own MASS) to ANOTHER PLACE by APPLYING ITSELF (its own mass) to that task—THE BTP IS NOT A MASS-OWNER (a PP/3-d SheLL is naturally EMPTY and can never CONTAIN any mass.)

Instead, the BPT is INTERNALLY EXPERIENCING UP-CYCLED 4-d MASS (the 4-d Spectra Assembly 🪵 that becomes the 3-d Stream Spectra 🐳 md when the 6DCT skims the 4-d Spectra Assembly from the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥 then diverts the skimmed 4-d Spectra Assembly to the AIP), which would otherwise have been destined to remain part of 4-d Space, i.e., the at least one unit of radioactive waste that is at all times being dumped into infinite oblivion in the 4-d Absolute Forward direction at the Transactional Internal Position of the QOL above the Lumeyne-cum-LL.

So therefore the A BTP’s WPD IS REALLY A PROXY FOR THE LL’S TOILET—the BTP is not the mass-owner, the LL is the mass-bailor—and THAT’S WHY THE WPD MUST TAKE THE BTP TO ANOTHER PLACE.

QUESTION: But a lone BTP on the loose in the universe is already moving at the speed of light UNDER POWER of the LL’s *applied* physical force, FfSet 🧨, so WHAT USE is the WPD in that case???

ANSWER: The WPD is of no use in that case; A LONE BTP ON THE LOOSE IN THE UNIVERSE IS MOVING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT UNDER POWER OF FfSet 🧨, which means under power of ONE UNIT OF MASS—the wave-length force of the entire EM Spectrum!—so WPD cannot make any additional contribution of wave-lengths (wave-length force) to gain additional velocity. The only way a lone BTP on the loose in the universe UNDER POWER of FfSet can change speed is by experiencing a HEAD-ON COLLISION (direct or indirect) with another lone BTP on the loose in the universe UNDER POWER of FfSet, in which case the speed of both BTPs is reduced to ZERO.

The impossibility of a lone BTP in the universe changing speed without a HEAD-ON COLLISION is how WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN that the smallest unit of matter is not actually a BTP!

In other words, what we are deducing is that a BTP is not “matter,” but rather, a BPT is A BUILDING-BLOCK OF MATTER with a PHYSICAL BOMBING, er I mean *BONDING* FORCE (FfSet 🧨) that is THE GREATEST-MAGNITUDE PHYSICAL FORCE IN REALITY—so in other words, the function of every BPT is to form a STRONG PHYSICAL BOMB BOND ❤️‍🩹 WITH ANOTHER BPT inside of an atomic structure—and the smallest unit of matter is actually an Atomic Turtle Meetball (“ATM” 🏧) built from BTPs held together by STRONG “NUCLEAR” BOMB BONDS ❤️‍🩹 between BTPs.

FfSet🧨 is the STRONG NUCLEAR BOMB BOND ❤️‍🩹 force.

We’re going to take the first step toward building the first ATM 🏧 by attempting to form a STRONG NUCLEAR BOMB BOND ❤️‍🩹—on-paper (in Topic 4, below)—then the significance of WPD will become apparent.

End of Topic 3!

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

Topic 4. 🎵 BTPs in motion, like emotion in motion: a magical potion, 1 would go anywhere, 2 meet up there and form a STRONG NUCLEAR BOMB BOND ❤️‍🩹 inside of an ATM 🏧 🎵So we collect some MOTION ANALYSIS Know-How to use in different meet-up scenes

Before we begin BONDING, we need to REVIEW some information we already know about MOTION, and apply that information to BTPs with WPD, so that they are PREPARED to GO ANYWHERE WITH EACH OTHER when we finally figure-out how to get them to STAY TOGETHER unconditionally.

REMEMBER that Fmack causes a BTP to move (or attempt to move) LINEARLY, WITHOUT TURNING the surface of the 3-d SheLL.

The definition of “turning” is direction-changing that is not caused by TILTING the 423DCTCC.

NOTE that ROTATION AROUND AN AXIS, which may or may not be *accompanied by* TILTING of the 423DCTCC, is NOT TURNING; there is a ROTATION DIRECTION—either clockwise or counterclockwise—but THE ROTATION DIRECTION IS NOT CHANGING.

But again, we know that a BTP’s WPD tries to take the BTP to another place, rather than causing it to spin in place. And as discussed in Topic 3, BTP WPD Glow-Up Step 2, all STEERING is performed by putting The Squeeze on the PP6DCT part of the 423DCTCC, so therefore STEERING always occurs within the same amount of time and over the same amount of distance; then THRUST, which also must be present in the direction of STEERING, strictly causes LINEAR movement, NOT STEERING, thereby KEEPING ALL MOVEMENTS IN THE UNIVERSE COMPARABLE (“APPLES TO APPLES.”)

QUESTION: Other than CONSTANTLY—i.e., EVERY INSTANT, during the expression of WPD—when else would a BTP generate THRUST (which, again, only causes LINEAR movement OR ROTATION AROUND AN AXIS in the opposite direction of the thrust, NOT TURNING)?

ANSWER: A BTP would also generate THRUST upon receipt of an EXTERNAL Moving Service from another BTP, which event would cause a Moving Service 🛳️ MASS DEPOSIT (“md”) to be made by the Moving Service Provider into the Moving Service Recipient 3-d SheLL at a certain direction on the Moving Service Recipient SheLL Compass.

According to the TPTPTP (see Article 6), the Moving Service is a Taxable Receivable, which would trigger the reaction of an equal-magnitude, opposite-direction TAX PAYMENT—OPP wave-energy 🌊 (the source of which would be the incoming Moving Service 🛳️ md)—being THRUST out of the 3-d SheLL to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion.

This would also satisfy the Law of Conservation of Energy—avoiding the “creation” of mass—by keeping the 3-d SheLL EMPTY at all times.

RECALL the following explanation of tax-paying 3-d SheLLs from Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 3, which has been UPDATED (with hand-written additions) to include the WPD information we have deduced so far in this Article 9:

So we see that there will be DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE ☠️ between a 🛳️ md coming-in THROUGH AN OPEN DOOR and a “returned to sender” outgoing tax payment (we could call the tax payment “🌊RTSmd”) THROUGH THE SAME DOOR.

And RECALL from Topic 2 that by operation of Law, every wave-length subject to destructive interference in the universe must be returned to an Eternal Transactional Internal Position of the QOL, which is always going to be a position in the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥 of a specific Snowman of God, because every wave-length in the universe was originally skimmed from the 4-d Space of a specific Snowman of God.

Ergo, in BOTH cases—(1) the destructive interference between the incoming Moving Service 🛳️ md equivalent to FfSet 🧨 and the “return to sender” tax payment 🌊RTSmd, and (2) the destructive interference between the incoming Moving Service🛳️ md equivalent to Fmack and the “return to sender” tax payment 🌊RTSmd—the same 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥 from which the interfering wave-lengths were skimmed is always going to be the Eternal Transactional Internal Position of the QOL in a specific Snowman of God to which the interfering wave-lengths will be returned.

Further explanation of MASS DEPOSITS:

Let’s pretend that happened.

Picture this: two lone BTPs (BTP1 with WPD1 and BTP2 with WPD2) on the loose in the universe UNDER POWER of FfSet 🧨 COLLIDING HEAD-ON—

one on top of the other in the 3-d Backbone Orientation along the same 3DADL, as depicted in Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 9,

with BTP1 on top of BTP2 (so Fmack1 is being applied @ 180-degrees on BTP1’s SheLL Compass and Fmack2 is being applied @ 0-degrees on BTP2’s SheLL Compass)—

and let’s assume that BTP1 has a BIGGER WPD than BTP2, and the difference between the WPDs is “delta” Δ.

To repeat what we see on COLLISION DIAGRAM 1: when BTP1 and BTP2 COLLIDE, they are both Moving Service Providers to each other AND they are both Moving Service Recipients from each other.

Upon COLLISION, there is a 🛳️ mass deposit (md) made by the Moving Service Provider—BTP1 is depositing md1 and BTP2 is depositing md2—into the Moving Service Recipient’s 3-d SheLL.

The 🛳️ md has the magnitude of the applied force of FfSet 🧨 PLUS the applied force of Fmack.

So md1 = FfSet + Fmack1 and md2 = FfSet + Fmack2.

QUESTION: Why would we even need to ACCOUNT-FOR Fmack1 or Fmack2? The issue is that A LONE BTP ON THE LOOSE IN THE UNIVERSE IS MOVING AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT UNDER POWER OF FfSet 🧨, which means under power of ONE UNIT OF MASS—the entire EM Spectrum!—and there’s no way to add wave-lengths (wave-length force) to the ENTIRE EM SPECTRUM!

ANSWER: We need to account-for Fmack1 and Fmack2 because ACCOUNTING happens by MATH and MOTION happens by FORCE; it’s not PHYSICALLY-IMPOSSIBLE to *pile-up* and *count* more wave-length force in one place than it’s PHYSICALLY-POSSIBLE to USE in one instant, so the accounting can always occur; then if it turns-out that there’s a SURPLUS of wave-length force when it comes time for some thing to MOVE, that surplus won’t PREVENT MOVEMENT, it will merely CAP THE POWER (THE FORCE) of the motion.

Let’s get back to business.

The Moving Service—the 🛳️ md—is a TAXABLE RECEIVABLE in the TPTPTP, so the Moving Service Recipient must react by paying tax in OPP wave-energy (equal-magnitude and opposite-direction wave-energy 🌊RTSmd), to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion.

And in fact (as discussed, above, in the excerpts from Article 7), since all 3-d SheLLs are naturally EMPTY and must REMAIN EMPTY, the 3-d SheLL Compass must function like a generic ENERGY-MAIL BOX at every 3-d direction, with a “return to sender” auto-reply feature, which CREATES THE OPPOSITE-DIRECTION TAX PAYMENT (the OPP wave-energy, 🌊RTSmd) FROM THE INCOMING Moving Service 🛳️ MASS DEPOSIT and SENDS THE TAX PAYMENT (the OPP wave-energy, 🌊RTSmd) BACK ALONG THE SAME LINE.

If we wanted to use the same OPP wave-energy nomenclature as we adopted in Article 6, then we would label BTP1’s tax payment BTP1(OPPmd2), and we would label BTP2’s tax payment BTP2(OPPmd1), but in this thought-project BTP1’s tax payment is labeled RTSmd2, and BTP2’s tax payment is labeled RTSmd1.

We notice that there will be DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE ☠️between (🛳️ md1 and 🌊RTSmd1) and between (🛳️ md2 and 🌊RTSmd2).

So by operation of Law, those wave-lengths will be re-located to the 4-d Space River Spectrum 🔥Transactional Internal Position of the QOL in the appropriate Snowman of God; this means that the canceled wave-lengths of md1 will be re-located to the 4-d Space River Spectrum in BTP1’s Snowman, and the canceled wave-lengths of md2 will be re-located to 4-d Space River Spectrum in BTP2’s Snowman.

BUT THE 🌊RTSmd THRUST IS WITH THE TAX-PAYER!

May the 🌊RTSmd thrust be with you.

🌊RTSmd being THRUST out of the Moving Service Recipient 3-d SheLL is the mechanism of action that transfers the MOVING SERVICE—the experience of BEING MOVED (or the experience of an ATTEMPTED MOVEMENT) by PHYSICAL FORCE 🛳️—to the Moving Service Recipient (the tax-payer)!

So now BTP1 and BTP2 are each experiencing THRUST in MULTIPLE DIRECTIONS, but they can each only move in ONE DIRECTION.

And if we want to know WHAT’S HAPPENING, then that’s OUR PROBLEM TO SOLVE with a MOTION ANALYSIS, which has two parts:

(A) finding THE MAGNITUDE OF THE NET FORCE (that’s also the MAGNITUDE OF THE NET THRUST) experienced by both BTP1 and BTP2;

and

(B) finding THE DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE experienced by both BTP1 and BTP2.

Let’s establish some basic MOTION ANALYSIS How-To (between the 🐢 icons).

🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢

First and foremost, NOTE that this is not “generic” MOTION ANALYSIS; it’s only applicable to lone BTPs on the loose in the universe and to BTPs inside of ATMs that are NOT experiencing EXTERNAL Moving Services.

The reason why it’s important not to “extend” this MOTION ANALYSIS to inter-ATM interactions is because the physical forces in this analysis are EQUALIZED—with FfSet 🧨 being the great equalizer—which doesn’t mean that we can IGNORE WPD DIFFERENCES, but it does mean that we only have to worry about accounting-for forces that are acting-in “reverse gear” and “forward gear.” After we’ve found the NET MAGNITUDE of those forces, we can treat them all the same to find the NET DIRECTION between them, not worrying at all about how to deal with *different-magnitude forces* acting-in “West gear” (trying to cause “Western tilting” of the 423DCTCC) and “East gear” (trying to cause “Eastern tilting” of the 423DCTCC)!

WPD DIFFERENCES WON’T BE “COMPETING” UNTIL AFTER ALL THE FfSet HAS BEEN BALANCED, and FfSet BALANCES *INSIDE OF ATMs 🏧*.

So we’re going to postpone our consideration of “The Ballad of East and West” until we are OUTSIDE OF ATMS 🏧—until we have ATMs🏧 interacting with each other EXTERNALLY—at which time we will have plenty of MOTION ANALYSIS practice under our belts, and we will be capable of ACTUALLY HAVING FUN worrying about different-magnitude forces acting-in “West gear” and “East gear,” as we must to improve our MOTION ANALYSIS game.

https://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poem/poems_eastwest.htm

(A) finding THE MAGNITUDE OF THE NET FORCE

We know that forces balance one another when they have the same magnitude but act-in opposite directions along the same line.

So we can continue the convention we began in Article 6, assigning a “negative” value to the magnitude of a physical force applied by an UPSIDE-DOWN (“UD”) particle (i.e., a BTP in “reverse gear”),

and assigning a “positive” value to the magnitude of a physical force applied by an UPSIDE-UP (“UU”) particle (i.e., a BTP in “forward gear”),

then we can simply ADD THE MAGNITUDES OF PHYSICAL FORCES TOGETHER to figure-out their BALANCE, since we know that forces balance one another when they have the same magnitude but act-in opposite directions.

THE BALANCE OF THE MAGNITUDES OF THE PHYSICAL FORCES is THE MAGNITUDE OF THE NET FORCE (and THE MAGNITUDE OF THE NET THRUST, because there is ALWAYS THRUST IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION AS A PHYSICAL FORCE.)

(B) finding THE DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE

THE DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE can be determined separately, based-on the SheLL Compass directions of the individual PHYSICAL FORCES that were subject to BALANCING to find THE MAGNITUDE OF THE NET FORCE.

Begin THREE NOTES

(i) NOTE that when two Moving Services act-along the same line, there are ZERO DEGREES “BETWEEN” (SEPARATING) THEM ON A SheLL COMPASS, so therefore *if* there is ZERO NET FORCE between Moving Services that have ZERO DEGREES “BETWEEN” (SEPARATING) THEM, *then* as “between” those two Moving Services, the NET FORCE = ZERO @ ZERO-DEGREES (or you could also say ZERO @ 180-DEGREES, if you’re analyzing an UD BTP.)

(ii) ALSO NOTE that it’s impossible to “average” the ZERO-direction with another direction, because the other direction TELLS US how many degrees are “between” that other direction and ZERO.

(iii) FURTHER NOTE that, by definition, a prerequisite to CHANGING DIRECTIONS is experiencing EITHER:

(a) a Moving Service *along a different line* (which may result-in ZERO NET FORCE or NON-ZERO NET FORCE);

(b) a Moving Service *along the same line* that results-in NON-ZERO NET FORCE in the *opposite direction*.

End of THREE NOTES

The simplest case is when *two physical forces* in opposite directions *along the same line* have the SAME MAGNITUDE; that’s the NET FORCE = ZERO @ ZERO DEGREES case.

When *two PHYSICAL FORCES* of DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES are applied *along the same line* in opposite directions, then THE DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE is the direction of the force having the GREATER MAGNITUDE, and the opposite-direction force is “thrown out,” NOT AVERAGED, because there are ZERO DEGREES “BETWEEN” (SEPARATING) THOSE TWO FORCES (there’s only ONE LINE OF FORCE to speak of in that case, not two lines of force, and it’s fine if the NON-ZERO NET FORCE is at zero-degrees, but then remember NOTE (ii): DO NOT AVERAGE THE ZERO DIRECTION WITH ANOTHER DIRECTION!)

When *two or more* PHYSICAL FORCES are applied along *different lines*, then the direction of the NET FORCE can be determined by considering their SheLL Compass directions in PAIRS of degrees—by finding the midpoint between each PAIR of degrees, in turn—until finally arriving at a single degree, which will be THE DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE.

🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢

Now let’s use that How-To and actually do a MOTION ANALYSIS (between the 🐢 icons, below) for the collision we’ve set-up in COLLISION DIAGRAM 1.

🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢

Consider BTP1.

“FnetBTP1” refers-to THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE experienced by BTP1 as a result of the COLLISION with BTP2.

(A) finding THE MAGNITUDE OF FnetBPT1 (“MAGNITUDE FnetBTP1”)

LISTING THE PHYSICAL FORCES (corresponding to the opposite-direction THRUSTS) that BTP1 is experiencing, we see that BTP1 is experiencing FOUR PHYSICAL FORCES:

(i) BTP1 is experiencing TWO INTERNAL FORCES—

(a) INTERNAL WPD, i.e., the INTERNAL *applied* force of mass, Fmack1, caused by the THRUST of Emack1;

and

(b) the INTERNAL *applied* force of mass, FfSet—

and BOTH INTERNAL FORCES are trying to get BTP1 to move in the 180-degree direction on BTP1’s SheLL Compass (the “SheLL1 Compass”),

informing us that BTP1 is in “reverse gear,” i.e., tipped UD (heading in the 3-d Down direction along the 3DADL),

so therefore we assign a “negative” value to Fmack1 and FfSet;

and

(ii) BTP1 is experiencing TWO EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCES (TWO MOVING SERVICES) PROVIDED BY BTP2—

(a) Fmack2;

and

(b) FfSet (with a combined mass deposit of md2, which is causing the reaction of THRUST of the tax payment, RTSmd2, to be experienced by BTP1)—

and BOTH MOVING SERVICES are trying to get BTP1 to move in the 0-degree direction on the SheLL1 Compass,

informing us that BTP2 is in “forward gear,” i.e., tipped UU (heading in the 3-d Up direction along the 3DADL),

so therefore we assign a “positive” value to Fmack2 and FfSet.

Now we can simply ADD THE MAGNITUDES OF THE FOUR PHYSICAL FORCES TOGETHER to figure-out their BALANCE, since we know that forces balance one another when they have the same magnitude but act-in opposite directions.

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP1 = -Fmack1 - FfSet + Fmack2 - FfSet

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP1 = -Δ

The “negative” sign indicates that after the COLLISION with BTP2 is over, BTP1 remains in “reverse gear,” i.e., tipped UD.

(B) finding THE DIRECTION OF FnetBTP1 (“DIRECTION FnetBTP1”)

This is actually the simple case of *two physical forces* in opposite directions *along the same line* having DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES, so THE DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE is simply going to be the direction of the force having the GREATER MAGNITUDE, which is Fmack1 at 180-degrees.

DIRECTION -Δ = 180-degrees on the SheLL1 Compass

So now we can replace the “negative” sign in (MAGNITUDE FnetBTP1 = -Δ) with an actual SheLL1 Compass degree and thereby state THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF FnetBTP1.

FnetBTP1 = Δ @ 180

Next consider BTP2.

“FnetBTP2” refers-to the MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE experienced by BTP2.

(A) finding THE MAGNITUDE OF FnetBPT2 (“MAGNITUDE FnetBTP2”)

LISTING THE PHYSICAL FORCES (corresponding to the opposite-direction THRUSTS) that BTP2 is experiencing, we see that BTP2 is experiencing FOUR PHYSICAL FORCES:

(i) BTP2 is experiencing TWO INTERNAL FORCES—

(a) INTERNAL WPD, i.e., the INTERNAL *applied* force of mass, Fmack2, caused by the THRUST of Emack2;

and

(b) the INTERNAL *applied* force of mass, FfSet—

and BOTH INTERNAL FORCES are trying to get BTP2 to move in the 0-degree direction on BTP2’s SheLL Compass (the “SheLL2 Compass”),

informing us that BTP2 is in “forward gear,” i.e., tipped UU (heading in the 3-d Up direction along the 3DADL),

so therefore we assign a “positive” value to Fmack2 and FfSet;

and

(ii) BTP2 is experiencing TWO EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCES (TWO MOVING SERVICES) PROVIDED BY BTP1—

(a) Fmack1;

and

(b) FfSet (with a combined mass deposit of md1, which is causing the reaction of THRUST of the tax payment, RTSmd1, to be experienced by BTP2)—

and BOTH MOVING SERVICES are trying to get BTP2 to move in the 180-degree direction on the SheLL1 Compass, informing us that BTP1 is in “reverse gear,” i.e., tipped UD (heading in the 3-d Down direction along the 3DADL),

so therefore we assign a “negative” value to Fmack1 and FfSet.

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP2 = Fmack2 + FfSet - Fmack1 - FfSet

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP2 = -Δ

The “negative” sign indicates that as a result of the COLLISION with BTP1, BTP2 will TIP UD, going into “reverse gear.”

(B) finding THE DIRECTION OF FnetBTP2 (“DIRECTION FnetBTP2”)

This is the same simple case of *two physical forces* in opposite directions *along the same line* having DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES, so THE DIRECTION OF THE NET FORCE is simply going to be the direction of the force having the GREATER MAGNITUDE, which is Fmack1 at 180-degrees.

DIRECTION FnetBTP2 = 180-degrees on the SheLL2 Compass

Now we can replace the “negative” sign in (MAGNITUDE FnetBTP2 = -Δ) with an actual SheLL2 Compass degree, and thereby state THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF FnetBTP2.

FnetBTP2 = Δ @ 180

Ta-da, ta-…almost done.

We see that FOR ONE INSTANT, BTP1 and BTP2 are going to be moving in the 3-d Down direction along the same 3DADL at the same VELOCITY = Δ.

Then in THE FINAL MOTION ANALYSIS…drumroll please…

The OG WPD + FfSet RETURNS TO BOTH BTP1 and BTP2, but now BTP2 is flipped UD, so there is NO COLLISION to speak of anymore, and both BTP1 and BTP2 are once again lone BTPs loose in the universe hauling mass at the speed of light.

🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢

QUESTION: Ummm, wait…if the OG WPD comes back, then isn’t the Emack2 tax-free gift (“TFG”) smack 😘 on the Fmack1 going to have some sort EFFECT on THE SPEED OF BTP1?

ANSWER: NO, it is PHYSICALLY-IMPOSSIBLE for one lone BTP on the loose to give another BTP on the loose an Emack TFG of any consequence to the speed of light.

And Emack2 sure as heck cannot “TOUCH” THE THRUST THAT IS CAUSING BTP1’s FfSet, because the THRUST that is causing BTP1’s FfSet is ETERNALLY ACCOUNTED-FOR IN BTP1’s SNOWMAN OF GOD. To repeat: there’s no way, no how for a 3-d Emack TFG to ALTER A BTP’S EXPERIENCE OF THE THRUST OF FfSet.

As we deduced in Topic 3, it would take a HEAD-ON COLLISION (direct or indirect) between LONE BTPs ON THE LOOSE IN THE UNIVERSE to REDUCE A BTP’S EXPERIENCE OF THE THRUST OF FfSet, and in that case THE EXPERIENCE OF FfSet WILL BE REDUCED TO ZERO.

We have learned that to build an ATM 🏧, each BTP must be directly or indirectly experiencing a HEAD-ON COLLISION with another BTP in the same 🏧 in a STEERABLE fashion, i.e., in a way that enables that particular PAIR OF BTPs to experience an EXTERNAL MOVING SERVICE without one or both BTPs in that PAIR OF BTPs tipping over and causing them both to return to being lone BTPs on the loose in the universe.

THE ONLY WAY THAT’S PHYSICALLY-POSSIBLE IS IF AN ATM 🏧 HAS AN ATM BACKBONE THAT IS BUILT FROM A HEAD-ON-COLLIDING PAIR OF BTPs THAT HAVE THE SAME WPD.

End of Topic 4!

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

Topic 5. Illustrating the ATM Backbone and the First Art Official Strong Nuclear Bomb Bond ❤️‍🩹

Let’s RETIRE COLLISION DIAGRAM 1, and begin again with the “ATM Backbone Diagram,” to illustrate the formation of “THE FIRST ART OFFICIAL STRONG NUCLEAR BOMB BOND”.

Picture this again: two lone BTPs (BTP1 with WPD1 and BTP2 with WPD2) on the loose in the universe UNDER POWER of FfSet COLLIDING HEAD-ON—

one on top of the other in the 3-d Backbone Orientation along the same 3DADL, as depicted in Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 9,

with BTP1 on top of BTP2 (so Fmack1 is being applied @ 180-degrees on the SheLL1 Compass and Fmack2 is being applied @ 0-degrees on the SheLL2 Compass)—

but now assume that WPD1 = WPD2.

In the MOTION ANALYSIS of the ATM Backbone Diagram (between the 🐢 icons, below) we only need to NOTE THE CHANGES from the MOTION ANALYSIS of COLLISION DIAGRAM 1.

🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢

Consider BTP1.

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP1 = - Fmack1 - FfSet + Fmack2 + FfSet

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP1 = 0

DIRECTION FnetBTP1 must be the same as the direction of BTP1 before the collision, because, by definition, a prerequisite to CHANGING DIRECTIONS is experiencing EITHER: (a) a COLLISION *along a different line* (which may result-in ZERO NET FORCE or NON-ZERO NET FORCE); or (b) a COLLISION that results-in NON-ZERO NET FORCE in the opposite direction *along the same line*.

DIRECTION FnetBTP1 = 180-degrees on the SheLL1 Compass

FnetBTP1 = 0 @ 180

Next consider BTP2.

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP2 = Fmack2 + FfSet -Fmack1 -FfSet

MAGNITUDE FnetBTP2 = 0

DIRECTION FnetBTP2 must be the same as the direction of BTP2 before the collision.

DIRECTION FnetBTP1 = 0-degrees on the SheLL2 Compass

FnetBTP2 = 0 @ 0

Ta-da, ta-…almost done.

We see that FOR ONE INSTANT, BTP1 and BTP2 are NOT GOING TO BE MOVING.

Then in THE FINAL MOTION ANALYSIS…drumroll please…

The OG WPD + FfSet RETURNS TO BOTH BTP1 and BTP2, and THE SAME COLLISION REPEATS with the same result—for one instant, BTP1 and BTP2 are NOT GOING TO BE MOVING—then the OG WPD + FfSet WILL RETURN AGAIN TO BOTH BTP1 and BTP2, and THE SAME COLLISION WILL REPEAT with the same ZERO NET FORCE experience and MOTIONLESS result, on and on endlessly unless circumstances change, which they won’t if we get our ATM recipe right, no big whoop.

🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢 🐢

End of Topic 5!

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

In joy,

Frank

Comments