Frank

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

Every Coffee Talk Ever: Part 1

Topic List

Topic 1. Getting to know the Electromagnetic (EM) Spectrum: it’s like a universal currency system having different denominations of cash, except it has different denominations of radiation

Topic 2. Noticing Spectras on the loose in the universe and discussing the implications: free piles of money everywhere; unmetered power; a Funky Cold Medina, aka the Quantum of Light (“QOL”); and different naturally EMPTY PPs/3-d SheLLs expressing different artificial Wave-Particle Duality (“WPD”)

Topic 3. How SybiLL SAPs with EMPTY 3-d SheLLs get individual WPD and transform into artificial baby turtle-particles (“BTPs”) that can all mack-on each other, subject to the Hierarchy of Relativity of 3-d directions

Topic 4. 🎵 BTPs in motion, like emotion in motion: a magical potion, 1 would go anywhere, 2 meet up there and form a STRONG NUCLEAR BOND inside of an Atomic Turtle Meetball (“ATM” 🏧 )🎵

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️

Topic 1. Getting to know the Electromagnetic (EM) Spectrum: it’s like a universal cash currency having different denominations of cash, except it has different denominations of radiation 

BY OBSERVATION, light (aka radiation) is comprised of a myriad of wave-lengths, collectively referred-to as the ELECTROMAGNETIC (EM) SPECTRUM

Each wave-length of the EM Spectrum has a force-value, which is like the face-value of one denomination of a cash currency; the longest wave-length has the lowest force-value, so it’s like the least valuable coin, and the shortest wave-length has the highest face-value, so it’s like the most valuable bill. 

This enables precise amounts of force to be created using different combinations of wave-lengths, just like precise amounts of money can be created using different denominations of cash.

Topic 2. Noticing Spectras on the loose in the universe and discussing the implications: free piles of money everywhere; unmetered power; a Funky Cold Medina, aka the Quantum of Light (“QOL”); and different naturally EMPTY PPs/3-d SheLLs expressing different artificial Wave-Particle Duality (“WPD”)

Discrete wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum and combinations of wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum—“Spectras,” which are like piles of cash, large and small, that are made from various denominations of currency—can seemingly be *separated* from the EM Spectrum as-a-whole and appear “on their own” at different 3-d positions, flying here and there along straight lines in all directions throughout the universe.

And that’s no joke: you know how expensive and dirty power-generation can be, and the Spectras flying around don’t belong to anyone, so if someone could figure-out how to cheaply and cleanly collect even a tiny fraction of that universal currency, it would be like minting money!

But that is going to be impossible for anyone who subscribes to any old 👌 Boomer theory to figure-out how to do. 

Begin VOCABULARY NOTES

The EM Spectrum is a reference to the entire range of wave-lengths of light, aka radiation, in the universe

So I don’t want to use the term “spectrum” ambiguously, e.g., to refer to PORTIONS of the EM Spectrum. Instead, I am going to use the term Spectra to refer-to a quantity of wave-lengths (a wave-length or a combination of wave-lengths) of the EM Spectrum that is present at a specific 3-d position; the plural of Spectra is Spectras

End of VOCABULARY NOTES

Some Spectras, such as RAINBOWS, are visible to our eyes, and some Spectras are invisible to our eyes.

Source: “Spectroscopy 101 - Types of Spectra[s] and Spectroscopy“ 

NOTE that what is called “EMISSION” behavior of EM wave-energy is actually an example of light acting-on matter, as we will discover in Topic 3, below. 

So the TOEWC does have an EMISSION THEORY.

But the TOEWC does not have theories of OTHER EM WAVE BEHAVIORS (e.g., “reflection” or “absorption” or “refraction” or “polarization” or “diffraction” or “scattering”) to speak of, because IT HAS BEEN PROVEN beyond any LOGICAL (aka REASONABLE) doubt that light and matter have an Absolute-Relative relationship, which means that light can act-upon matter but matter cannot act-upon light. 

RECALL from Article 3:

And of course a thing cannot be relative-to itself.

RECALL from Article 5, Chapter 5:

To repeat the logical deduction: the wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum are NOT relative-to each other! 

And EMPIRICAL SCIENCE helpfully confirms the correctness of this deduction for us.

Check it out: DIFFERENT WAVE-LENGTHS of the EM Spectrum DO NOT INTERACT with each other inside of the universe, but rather, THEY PASS THROUGH EACH OTHER and SUPERIMPOSE ALONG THE SAME 3-d LINES, forming…wait for it…SPECTRAS on the loose in the universe at those 3-d locations!

In other words, DIFFERENT WAVE-LENGTHS OF THE EM SPECTRUM CO-EXIST IN THE SAME PLACE—they don’t REDUCE EACH OTHER TO NAUGHT, they form COMPOSITIONS of wave-lengths, aka SPECTRA—EVEN WHEN THEY ARE “CROSSING PATHS,” i.e., TRAVELING IN OPPOSING DIRECTIONS! 

QUESTION: Is this PROOF that the wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum are NOT relative-to each other? 

ANSWER: Yes! THE PROOF comes from the simple fact that *two things* CANNOT occupy the same position, and yet *two different wave-lengths* CAN occupy the same position—they can have *SUPERPOSITION*!—and what that MEANS is that two different wave-lengths are NOT REALLY TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, they are ONE THING, and one thing is NOT RELATIVE-TO ITSELF, by definition.

QUESTION: [*from the peanut gallery*]

That’s such a GREAT QUESTION!

Let’s unpack it—and ask it in a different way to be more specific—before we answer.

QUESTION: [*unpacked and re-asked*] If it’s TRUE that the wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum are NOT RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER, then why do DIFFERENT WAVE-LENGTHS of the EM Spectrum NOT INTERFERE with each other ALONG THE SAME LINES, and instead form SPECTRA via SUPERPOSITION when they are asked to co-exist at the same location while “passing through” each other (i.e., traveling in different directions), and yet THE SAME WAVE-LENGTHS of the EM Spectrum INTERFERE DESTRUCTIVELY with each other, RESULTING IN NO WAVE-LENGTHS REMAINING—PERMANENT NULLIFICATION! THE DESTROYED WAVE-LENGTHS DON’T POP-UP AGAIN AND GO ON THEIR WAYS!—when equal quantities of the same wave-lengths are asked to co-exist at the same location while “passing through” each other (i.e., traveling in opposing directions)??? 

ANSWER: Tone Who?!? That’s a Funky Cold Medina! And even though it obviously needs more cowbell, that Medina’s a monster! 

Begin EXPLANATION OF THE FUNKY COLD MEDINA 

We’ve got to explain PERMANENT DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between the same wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum traveling in opposite directions along the same line, and we can rest assured that the phenomenon of *SUPERPOSITION* proves that THE EXPLANATION IS NOT MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum! 

We could SIMPLY NOTE that one wave-length of the EM Spectrum is “a specific quantity and quality of A SINGLE THING”—it’s a specific quantity (one) of a certain wave-length of the EM Spectrum—and logically, it’s impossible for A SINGLE THING to simultaneously: (1) HAVE a specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at a location (i.e., HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at a location); and (2) NOT HAVE that same specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at the same location (i.e., NOT HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at the same location.) 

Right?

And that’s fine! But the Funky Cold Medina remains, because we’ve got to explain PERMANENT DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between the same wave-lengths of the EM Spectrum traveling in opposite directions along the same line! 

Think about it: How can the Law of Conservation of Energy be satisfied if DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between opposite-direction identical EM wave-lengths is PERMANENT, not TEMPORARY??? WE CANNOT DESTROY EM ENERGY with our theory; we’ve got to explain: WHERE DO THE DESTROYED WAVE-LENGTHS GO???

QUESTION: Hmmm, that’s a tricky one, so before we hazard a guess, maybe we should check with MODERN SCIENCE to see if there’s already a logical explanation for PERMANENT DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE? How does modern science say that the Law of Conservation of Energy in satisfied in this situation? 

ANSWER: Science says…”ABSORPTION.” 

In other words, science says that atoms are absorbing wave-length-carrying photons in one direction, which has the effect of exciting an orbiting electron (causing the electron to jump into a higher orbit based-on how much force the wave-length(s) had), so that the excited electron gives the atom POTENTIAL to do something (work), and then when the work is done—or the work itself may simply be—the generation of “heat,” which is emitted from the atom by “jiggling” motion, brings the electron back to its original orbit and satisfies the Law of Conservation of Energy.

I know, I know, we already showed that TIME IS ABSOLUTE (see Article 5, Chapter 2), which means that the Law of Conservation of Energy has to be satisfied AT ALL TIMES, and therefore INTERNALLY “CARRYING ENERGY” from time-to-time is impossible, so therefore the “ABSORPTION” theory is nonsensical for that reason alone. 

RECALL from Article 5, Chapter 2:

And don’t forget the SIMPLEST BACK IN BLACK FACT that we already know, to wit: the universe can’t be Eternal (as discussed, inter alia, in Article 3 and in Article 4, Chapter 5, the universe had had to be created by an Eternal Entity called God to solve the infinite regress problem of the first cause of motion), which means that the 3rd dimension is naturally EMPTY of mass/wave-energy—in other words, natural EMPTINESS is a FIXED QUALITY of the universe, ruling-out the possibility of “ABSORPTION” happening in the universe!—and indeed, we saw in Article 7 that PPs/3-d SheLLs are EMPTY, so therefore THEY CAN NEVER “HOLD” ANY MASS! 

So we can CHUCK OUT modern science’s entire “ABSORPTION” theory of EM radiation, along with THE BOHR MODEL OF THE ATOM. 

But we have yet to answer the Funky Cold Medina QUESTION: 

How can the Law of Conservation of Energy be satisfied if DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between opposite-direction identical EM wave-lengths is PERMANENT, not TEMPORARY???

 WE CANNOT DESTROY EM ENERGY with our theory; we’ve got to explain: WHERE DO THE DESTROYED WAVE-LENGTHS GO???

ANSWER: A single QUANTUM of Light (“QOL”) would make all things possible.  

Picture this: an Eternal LUMP-SUM OF LIGHT, aka EM Spectrum, called the QOL; the QOL has MANY INTERNAL POSITIONS—the QOL is one thing having “thing-ness” at many locations—and in fact, wherever the QOL goes, there it is, meaning that the QOL can be go wherever it needs to go in Reality, then whenever the QOL goes somewhere, it’s got an INTERNAL POSITION there, IN SOME MEASURE, which—the measure of “how much QOL is at an INTERNAL POSITION at a given time”—is calculated in discrete EM wave-lengths and collections of different EM wave-lengths, aka a Spectra

In other words, Spectras raise the specter of an ACCOUNTING issue that neither enlarges nor destroys the QOL, which is ETERNALLY CONSTANT.

The Internal Positions of the QOL are all “riding” on top of the 6-d Anchor Point—so this means that there are Internal Positions of the QOL along all of the ADL Backbones and along all of the 3-d lines inside of the universe (all of which 3-d lines are “riding” on top of the ADL Backbones, in such a manner that at every location along every 3-d line, there is a fixed Hierarchy of Relativity among 3-d directions; see Article 3)—and the wave-lengths of an individual Spectra at an Internal Position of the QOL are constantly updated at the speed of light.

In terms of what we’ve already deduced, we would now NOTE that we would expect to find an equal fraction of the QOL allotted to each Snowman of God. The fraction of the QOL allocated to each Snowman of God would include a number of sets of wave-lengths, and each set of wave-lengths would include all the wave-lengths in the EM Spectrum. ONE SET OF WAVE-LENGTHS in the EM Spectrum would be equal to one unit of mass. And as we’ve previously deduced (see Article 6), each of the three particles in the same Snowman of God constantly express the same Wave-Particle Duality, which is one unit of mass, i.e., one set of wave-lengths in the EM Spectrum. As we’ve also previously deduced, it takes two to make a thing go right, i.e., it takes two units of mass per particle to keep a Snowman of God operating perpetually. 

RECALL from Article 4, Chapter 2:

We saw in Article 6 that one unit of mass could be allotted to each of the different “TRANSACTIONAL” INTERNAL POSITIONS in a Snowman of God; the different Transactional Internal Positions in a Snowman of God are illustrated in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram (see Article 6, STEP 10) and THE BIG BANG diagram (see Article 6, STEP 18) as locations where EM wave-energy is identified. 

Each instance of wave-energy at a Transactional Internal Position in a Snowman of God is a Spectra comprising one unit of mass, i.e., one set of wave-lengths.

No big whoop. 

In that manner, there would be NO VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY when we didn’t have ABSORPTION to explain DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE between the same EM wave-lengths traveling in opposite directions along the same line, because (and here I quote myself from above):

“We could SIMPLY NOTE that one wave-length of the EM Spectrum is ‘a specific quantity and quality of A SINGLE THING’—it’s a specific quantity (one) of a certain wave-length of the EM Spectrum—and logically, it’s impossible for A SINGLE THING to simultaneously: (1) HAVE a specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at a location (i.e., HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at a location); and (2) NOT HAVE that same specific quantity and quality of THING-NESS at the same location (i.e., NOT HAVE one wave-length of a certain type at the same location.)” 

QUESTION: Yes, but A THING CANNOT BE RELATIVE-TO ITSELF—and therefore A THING CANNOT DESTROY ITSELF—so what, exactly, is the mechanism of action that causes DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE?

ANSWER: RECALL from Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 3:

QUESTION: OK fine, but that conclusion does not tell us anything about HOW THIS PARTICULAR LEGAL LOOP-HOLE OPERATES IN REALITY; we still need to know: THROUGH WHAT “TRAP DOORS”—to what ETERNAL INTERNAL POSITIONS—DO THE DESTRUCTIVELY INTERFERING WAVE-LENGTHS GO in the QOL, by operation of Law? 

ANSWER: By operation of Law, every wave-length subject to destructive interference in the universe would have to be returned to an Eternal Internal Position in the Funky Cold Medina, aka the QOL (that means a Transactional Internal Position in a Snowman of God), which is always going to be the OPEN DOOR through which 4-d Space—all un-recycled Eternally-burning radioactive waste 🔥—is RE-LOCATED INTO INFINITE OBLIVION in the 4-d Absolute Forward direction.

End of EXPLANATION OF THE FUNKY COLD MEDINA





In joy,

Frank

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.