Article 1. GOOD AFTERNOON MR. DAWKINS: There Is One Who Is Good

************************************************

“Good Afternoon”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMkJIR9pX1w

Welcome to REDUX, “The God Delusion Debate”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF5bPI92-5o

*************************************************

The original debate was held on October 3, 2007.

AGAINST GOD was Atheist Richard Dawkins, author of the 2006 book called “The God Delusion.”

FOR GOD was Christian mathematics expert John Lennox. 

In the present day I am interjecting myself into the debate in the FOR GOD corner. 

But I’m not debating about religion.

I don’t want to argue with anyone about matters of personal choice.

This is a website about THE LAWS of the universe.

And I will show that ACKNOWLEDGING GOD’S EXISTENCE—

AND ALSO, I WILL SHOW, THE EXISTENCE OF GOOD AND EVIL—

IS NOT A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE

IT IS A MATTER OF SCIENCE

IF A PERSON WANTS TO CALL THEMSELVES AN HONEST PERSON AND SCIENTIST.

There’s no way to KICK GOD AND GOOD AND EVIL OUT OF SCIENCE.

“In the Beginning there was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” —John 1:1 (American Standard Version translation)

That citation by John Lennox was Big Bang on!

NOTE that I am not citing John 1:1 as proof of anything, but rather, I am citing John 1:1 because I CAN PROVE GOD’S EXISTENCE AND GOD’S ETERNAL-NESS *and* I CAN PROVE THE TRUTH OF THE WORDS AT JOHN 1:1 by proving THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD “GOOD.”  

So GOOD is the word of the day!

But GOOD can only be understood by doing some math first. 

The mathematical axiom upon which I will being resting my “good” case is this: Mutually exclusive events must be dependent events, not independent events. 

Source: BYJUS.com, regarding “Mutually Exclusive Events”: 

“Mutually exclusive events are those that do not occur at the same time. For example, when a coin is tossed then the result will be either head or tail, but we cannot get both the results….If two events are mutually exclusive, they are not independent. Also, independent events cannot be mutually exclusive.” 

The Biblical character of Jesus also provides an example of mutually exclusive events in the metaphor of trees and fruit, at Matthew 7:17-18 (American Standard Version translation): 

“[E]very good tree bringeth forth good fruit, but the corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.”

This means that “good” is the absence of “evil,” and likewise that “evil” is the absence of “good.”

OK so that’s the “good” math.

Next I will show that “good” is one thing, not a plurality of things.

The SIGNIFICANCE of the proof that “good” is one thing, not a plurality of things, is that ”evil,” which may be any number of things, must be dependent-upon “good,” but not vice-versa (meaning that “good” must be Absolute, not dependent-upon “evil.”) 

*******************BEGIN JESUS DETOUR******************** 

I’m still not talking-about RELIGION. 

I’m still talking about THE LAWS of the universe.

But I am going to be talking about God in this “Jesus Detour,” and I realize that I haven’t yet proven God’s existence. 

But I respectfully request the liberty to conduct some discussion about God now.

The unproven introduction of God now is Necessary to highlight a LEGAL ISSUE that gives us a LEGAL MYSTERY (conventionally called “The Problem of Evil”) we must solve (as confirmed by Wikipedia, “If God lacks…omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of evil can be resolved”), and it’s also Necessary to VERIFY THE LEGAL CREDIBILITY OF JESUS’S WORDS.

Then I will prove God’s existence AND solve the LEGAL MYSTERY (“The Problem of Evil”) later in the blog post, by proving that God lacks omnibenevolence.

LEGAL ISSUE.
The Biblical character of Jesus addresses the issue of “good” being one thing, not a plurality of things, at Mark 10:18, saying (in the American Standard Version translation):“Why callest…me good? none is good save one, even God.”

NOTE that the different translations of Mark 10:18 are semantically different, and the translations that call God “the good one” are in direct conflict with John 10:30 (“I and the Father are one,” discussed below), because if Jesus and the Father are one, then neither of them is “the good one” according to Jesus. 

In other words, if Jesus is not “the good one” then neither is The Father (God), because according to Jesus, JESUS AND THE FATHER ARE ONE. 

But that’s fine; I submit that Jesus’s words are confirmation that Jesus understood “The Problem of Evil,” and intended to resolve it by affirming God’s lack of omnibenevolence. 

And I will independently show later in the post (in the ANSWER to THE PROBLEM OF EVIL) HOW, as a matter of PHYSICS, it is possible for Jesus/God to NOT be “the good one” (in other words, to lack omnibenevolence) but yet still “bear good fruit.” 

ALSO NOTE that I am not citing Jesus’s words as proof of my claim that “good” is one thing, not a plurality of things. After this JESUS DETOUR, I will make my own LEGAL aka LOGICAL proof of my claim that “good” is one thing, not a plurality of things. 

LEGAL MYSTERY aka THE PROBLEM OF EVIL.

THE REASON I CITE JESUS’S WORDS ABOUT THE SINGULARITY OF GOOD-NESS is because IF JESUS IS CORRECT THAT GOOD IS ONE THING (and Christians had better not be arguing with him) AND IF JESUS SAYS THAT HE IS NOT GOOD (that’s what he said), THEN BY JESUS’S WORDS IN THE METAPHOR OF TREES AND FRUIT at Matthew 7:17-18, JESUS BEARS EVIL FRUIT NOT GOOD FRUIT. 

But that’s impossible if Jesus is a credible source of information about THE LAWS of the universe!

VERIFYING THE LEGAL CREDIBILITY OF JESUS’S WORDS.

So it’s up to me to ESTABLISH THAT JESUS IS A CREDIBLE SOURCE about THE LAWS of the universe if I want to cite Jesus’s words about “good” being one thing as an “independent verification” of my own conclusion about “good” being one thing.

But the Biblical story of Jesus is HEARSAY; it is not a story told (or “signed”) by Jesus, it is a story told by third parties who are not available for cross-examination. 

In all courts of general jurisdiction in the USA, if hearsay is unreliable then it’s INADMISSIBLE AS PROOF OF THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER. 

And in the “Age of Reason,” Thomas Paine did such a thorough job of enumerating the places where the hearsay in the New Testament regarding the matter of Jesus’s life-and-death story is unreliable that I would hasten to that conclusion.  

BUT BE THE EVIL FRUIT OF UNRELIABLE HEARSAY ABOUT GOD as it may, JESUS’S WORDS at Mark 10:18 ABOUT JESUS NOT BEING GOOD do not fall into the category of UNRELIABLE HEARSAY if we can logically prove that GOD is the author of the gospels.

This is because THE CHARACTER OF JESUS IS SAID TO BE THE CHARACTER OF GOD (see, e.g., “I and the Father are one” at John 10:30, American Standard Version translation; note all of the translations of John 10:30 are semantically identical), so the words of Jesus written by God would NOT BE HEARSAY.

We could simply EVALUATE JESUS’S WORDS AGAINST INDEPENDENTLY-KNOWN TRUTHS TO ESTABLISH THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OF THE WORDS, then we could rely on Jesus’s words as LEGAL (SCIENTIFIC) EVIDENCE.

But still, the words written by God that were attributed to non-God Biblical characters WOULD STILL BE HEARSAY because God put those words in the mouths of third parties who are not available for cross-examination because of DEATH, which makes them UNRELIABLE WITNESSES TO JESUS’S STORY, by definition, unless we are going to say that it’s RIGHT TO KILL SOMEONE FOR BEING RIGHT, which I submit is FALSE, and that’s a conclusion that I separately verify in Article 2 (HYAKUJO’S FOX: Case 2 in “The Gateless Gate” Book of Zen Koans by Mumon.)

So let’s get down to business. 

Again, if we can logically prove that God is the author of the gospels, then we don’t have to “throw away” the words of Jesus on the grounds of UNRELIABLE HEARSAY, but we do still have to “independently verify” the Truth of every matter Jesus spoke-about, because Jesus ominously said point-blank that his job is not to “do good.” 

And to repeat the LEGAL ISSUE, Jesus’s words at Mark 10:18 (“Why callest…me good? none is good save one“) are especially significant because Jesus also said “I and the Father are one” at John 10:30 (American Standard Version translation; note all of the translations of John 10:30 are semantically identical); and also to repeat the LEGAL MYSTERY, according to Jesus at Matthew 7:17-18, trees that bear good fruit and trees that bear evil fruit are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE, so IT SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR ONE WHO IS NOT GOOD TO PRODUCE GOOD FRUIT, AND WE SHOULD HAVE TO CALL JESUS EVIL IF WE DID NOT CALL HIM GOOD! 

So we’ve got to SOLVE THIS LEGAL MYSTERY aka THE PROBLEM OF EVIL if we want to avoid following false prophets AND if we want to avoid committing the worst possible blasphemy AND if we want to avoid turning a blind eye to LEGALLY-RELEVANT MATERIAL that is of worldwide public interest! 

Question: Do we find fault with Jesus’s understanding at Matthew 7:17-18 of THE MATHEMATICAL DEFINITION OF MUTUALLY-EXCLUSIVE EVENTS and his use of the metaphor of good and corrupt trees, which bear good and evil fruit respectively, to prove his knowledge?

Jesus: [Matthew 7:17-18, American Standard Version translation] [E]very good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but the corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.”

Answer: No, there is no fault to find with Jesus’s knowledge of good and evil and their mathematical (mutually exclusive) relationship.

So we know that Jesus’s words couldn’t have been written by A LUNATIC who doesn’t know good from evil from a poached egg! 

And that further tells us that the author of Jesus’s words WAS NOT CONFUSED about HOW TO IDENTIFY PEOPLE either! 

This means that when the author put the words “I and the Father are one” into Jesus’s mouth at John 10:30, there was NO CONFUSION in the author’s mind about what was being said.  

All right stay with me now—

or rather I should say stay with C.S. Lewis, because this is his “Lord, Liar, or Lunatic?” TRILEMMA logic that I’m borrowing from his book “Mere Christianity”—

because if the author of Jesus’s words wasn’t A LUNATIC or A SEVERELY CONFUSED HYPOCRITICAL INDIVIDUAL WITH WEAK PEOPLE-IDENTIFICATION SKILLS WHO SINCERELY BELIEVED HIMSELF TO BE A GREAT EXPERT MORAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILER (which would be the same difference as being A LUNATIC), then the author of Jesus’s words was either A LIAR or GOD.

C.S. Lewis: “I am trying here to prevent anyone from saying the really foolish thing that people often say about [Jesus]: ‘I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God.’ That is the one thing we must not say. A man…[who] said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice….You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon, or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God. But let us not come up with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.”  

OK so we’ve noted already that there is no fault to find with Jesus’s knowledge of good and evil and their mathematical (mutually-exclusive) relationship, so there’s NO LUNATIC there and NO LIE there either.

Then regarding Jesus’s moral teachings, which boil-down to “love God” and “treat people the way you want to be treated,”  there is nothing sus, by which I mean that if a person always followed Jesus’s actual moral teachings, then that person could not go wrong in the present-day, regardless of whether or not 2,000 years ago Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, was crucified by Pontius Pilate on a cross or a stavros and died and was buried, then on the third day arose from the dead and ascended into heaven to sit at the right hand of God the Father Almighty. 

So we see that the character of Jesus is not the character of A LIAR.

This means that that author of Jesus’s words must be GOD.  

But Jesus’s words were “quoted” by the putative authors of “the gospels”: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John!

Yet the character of Jesus appears in a story that is holier than Swiss cheese! 

Ergo, the author of “the gospels” must also be GOD. 

But still, that’s A CONTRADICTION that demands an explanation.

We already figured-out, above, that words about God spoken-by non-God characters are properly called HEARSAY, and are with few exceptions UNRELIABLE HEARSAY, and therefore cannot be relied-upon to prove the Truth of the matter unless we can independently verify the Truth of the matter by other means. 

But it’s weird because the words about God that God puts in the mouth of non-God characters are HEARSAY CREATED BY GOD! 

And that’s fine, and in fact it gives us all the more reason to BEWARE OF FALSE PROPHETS, because once we figure-out that God is creating hearsay about the murder-torture of God, then that smacks of A LEGAL TEST that we want to PASS, not flunk, and “pointing the finger at God” and crying “UNFAIR!”—trying to CENSOR OR CENSURE GOD—is not going to get us anywhere!    

But what about the NON-HEARSAY words God writes and puts in the mouth of “God characters” such as Jesus?

CAN GOD LIE in the course of fulfilling “official” duties? Is the natural question.

The answer is that if God could not lie TO A LIAR then that would make it impossible for God to do Justice and save honest people from liars! 

And so we must conclude that it’s not only POSSIBLE for God to lie in the course of conducting “official” business, it’s NECESSARY sometimes. 

But IS IT GOOD TO LIE in the course of fulfilling “official” duties? Is a different question altogether.

The answer is clearly NO, LYING IS NOT A GOOD WAY TO FULFILL PUBLIC DUTIES. 

And let us not come up with any patronizing nonsense about lying being a noble virtue!

How did Immanuel Kant put it? 

Mr. Kant said: “If the truth shall kill them, let them die!”

But again, INJUSTICE may be done if what is DESERVED is A LIE and what is given by God is THE TRUTH; in that case THE LIE would be EYE-FOR-EYE JUSTICE and the Truth would be AN UNDESERVED GIFT. 

God giving the gift of mercy to the corrupt WHILE LEAVING-OUT THE DUE JUSTICE is God making a sacrifice of the innocent to benefit the guilty!

So while it’s possible for A LIE and THE TRUTH to both be given by God in the interest of the due administration of Justice—and in fact, that would fully explain the mixed-bag of Truth and fiction in the gospels, which C.S. Lewis’s logic informs us must have been authored by God—the receipt of THE TRUTH does not obviate the Necessity for God to deliver THE LIE as well. 

But again, THE LIE IS NOT GOOD, by definition (and also again, let us not come up with any patronizing nonsense about lying being a noble virtue), and so therefore THE LIE-TELLER IS NOT GOOD, even God. 

WELL THEN THAT IS THE HEART OF THE LEGAL MYSTERY aka THE PROBLEM OF EVIL THAT WE MUST EXPLAIN, because we can’t violate COMMON SENSE and say that GOD IS EVIL!

FINAL JEOPARDY QUESTION in re: THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: 

HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING TWO THINGS TO BE TRUE? 

Thing #1, Jesus, who is one with the Father (see John 10:30), is not good (see Mark 10:18);

and

Thing #2, Jesus/the Father can bringeth forth good fruit without “being good” per se 

The problem is that according to Jesus/The Father at Matthew 7:17-18 good fruit and evil fruit are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE, so therefore as a matter of mathematics IT SHOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR ONE WHO IS NOT GOOD TO BRINGETH FORTH GOOD FRUIT!

To repeat: THAT IS SOMETHING WE HAVE TO EXPLAIN because we can’t THROW-AWAY JESUS’S WORDS without CAUSE and saying “JESUS IS EVIL” is going to cause us to FLUNK the test of REASON not PASS!

So we have to figure-out HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR JESUS (GOD) TO BEAR GOOD FRUIT YET NOT BE THE ONE GOOD THING ITSELF.

When we figure that out, then we will have SOLVED “THE PROBLEM OF EVIL”!

BUT IT IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM THE PROOF THAT “GOOD” IS ONE THING, NOT A PLURALITY OF THINGS, so I am going to POSTPONE “THE PROBLEM OF EVIL” thought-project about HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR GOD TO BEAR GOOD FRUIT YET NOT BE “THE ONE GOOD THING,” and I will discuss the answer below after God’s existence has been proven.

*******************END OF JESUS DETOUR********************

NOW I will independently prove my claim that there is only one way to “be good” (to “bringeth forth good fruit,” so to speak) in any given situation, not a number of different ways to “be good” within a certain known set of facts. 

In other words, MY CLAIM is that the definition of “good” is “the ONE THING that is not evil,” where evil may be AMORAL, meaning incapable of good-ness, or evil may be IMMORAL, meaning lacking good-ness on purpose.

Here RECALL from the “good” math discussion above that good and evil are examples of mutually exclusive events—so therefore they cannot be independent events—so if “good is the one thing that is not evil,” then good must be THE STANDARD by which evil is identified! This further tells us that evil must be DEPENDENT on good, but good cannot be DEPENDENT on evil, because it would be LOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for the one good thing that enables identification of a plurality of evil things to depend-upon the plurality of evil things for its existence. 

So MY CLAIM is that another way to describe the relationship between good and evil is to say that good is ABSOLUTE and evil is RELATIVE to good.

All right, now with all of that having been said, here’s the LEGAL CASE aka the LOGIC in support of MY CLAIM that it is proper to conclude that good is SINGULAR and ABSOLUTE and evil is PLURAL and RELATIVE to good: 

Anyone who argues that there is more than one way to define the word GOOD shuts themselves out of the “debate” by declaring about themself: “I’M DELUSIONAL,” to borrow Richard Dawkins’ word. 

Explanation: If there are multiple standards of JUDGMENT about what is “right” (good) and what is “wrong” (evil) on a given set of facts, then the standards themselves are MEANINGLESS, and LOGIC ITSELF ceases to exist! 

In other words, to say that there are “multiple goods” in any given situation is to destroy the very FUNCTION of good, which is to SET THE STANDARD by which all things (good and evil) are JUDGED. 

Go-ahead and “check my math” by criticizing that conclusion.

For example, go-ahead and TEST ME by saying some version of the following to me:

“NO, Frank, you are WRONG to say that GOOD MUST BE ONE THING on a given set of facts, and I am RIGHT to say that GOOD MIGHT BE A PLURALITY OF THINGS!” 

First you see that you lose that argument automatically, because that argument inherently insists that you could not possibly be RIGHT, since if the argument is CORRECT and there are MULTIPLE STANDARDS for good-ness, then there is no such thing as RIGHT-ness!

Second you also see that the argument does not hurt my case at all, because I am admitting the POSSIBILITY that you, my critic, are correct, and I am SEARCHING TOGETHER WITH YOU, MY CRITIC, FOR THE ONE GOOD ANSWER.

So surely as a matter of fairness in the “debate,” I RECEIVE from my critic in the SAME MEASURE that I GIVE to my critic.

What I mean by RECEIVING from my critic in the SAME MEASURE that I GIVE to my critic is that if I GIVE the use of LOGIC to my critic to enable my critic to prove that they are RIGHT, then I must RECEIVE from my critic the SAME OPPORTUNITY to use LOGIC against the critic to prove that I am RIGHT. 

SO THE PROBLEM IS that if my critic disavows the existence of LOGIC itself by saying some version of: “I AM RIGHT THAT THERE IS NO ONE RIGHT ANSWER TO EVERY QUESTION” in the course of making a “logical” argument to ESTABLISH THEIR OWN RIGHT-NESS and my wrong-ness, then the critic DENIES ME THE USE OF LOGIC to establish MY RIGHT-NESS, and that causes the critic to lose their argument automatically because that is CORRUPT, NOT FAIR. 

As a condition of “debating,” the critic is forcing me to agree that THE IMPOSSIBLE—them being ABSOLUTELY RIGHT that there are no ABSOLUTE right answers—is POSSIBLE! 

As a condition of “debating,” the critic is FORCING ME TO RIDE OFF INTO THEIR DELUSIONAL SUNSET WITH THEM.

No!

The critic cannot even follow their own line of reasoning to win their own argument! 

I most certainly am not obliged to follow that critic anywhere! 

That critic makes it IMPOSSIBLE for me or for anyone else to follow their line of reasoning to get to the state of RIGHT-NESS.

Ergo, that critic cannot possibly be RIGHT.

The only thing that critic is actually PROVING is that it’s impossible for the critic themself to KNOW if the critic is right or wrong.

“SO SIT DOWN IF YOU DON’T KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG (if you’re DELUSIONAL, as Richard Dawkins puts it) AND LET THE RATIONAL PEOPLE TALK!” is the only LOGICAL response to that critic.  

There are limitless ways to be wrong (evil), but there is only one way to be right (good) on any given set of facts.

End of proof.

Now let’s complete the 6-STEP PROOF of God’s existence.

Step 1. We NOTE that we’ve logically proven the definitions of the WORDS good and evil.

Step 2. We RECALL that evil must be RELATIVE-TO good, and good must be ABSOLUTE. 

Step 3. We SEE (see Step 2) that IF A PHYSICAL EVIL ENTITY CAN BE FOUND IN THE WORLD, then the existence of a REAL GOOD ENTITY will also be proven, because the RELATIVE (evil) does not exist INDEPENDENT from what it is relative-to (good.) 

Step 4. We KNOW that God would be a real good entity, and we explain our LOGIC as follows: since good is ONE THING, and it’s a Truism that God could not be WRONG (we think about that statement: any critic making the argument that God does not know RIGHT from WRONG can simply be ignored), ergo, we KNOW that God would be RIGHT, and we RECALL that we have proven that there is only one way to be RIGHT on any given set of facts (any critic making the argument that the critic is RIGHT that there is no certain way to be RIGHT loses that argument automatically), so therefore we KNOW that God would be a real good entity. 

Step 5. We RECALL Christianity, and we DISCOVER that Christians are the proof that a physical evil entity can be found in the world, because Christians tell us (in their own words, not mine) that Jesus died “to take away” their SINS and SAVE the Christians from being punished for those same sins, but we KNOW that it would be UNNECESSARY for Jesus to be tortured to death to take away a Christian’s GOOD-ness to save the Christian from being punished for that same GOOD-ness, ERGO, sin and evil are SYNONYMS for all logical intents and purposes, and we SEE (see Step 3) that Christians are “living proof” that a physical evil entity exists in the world.  

Step 6. ERGO, we SEE (see Step 3) that a real good entity exists, and we also SEE (see Step 4) that God exists. 

“In the beginning, there was the [good] Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” —John 1:1 

Going back to the beginning of this post to reference (and finish!) the discussion of the October 3, 2007 debate between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox, we nail the coffin shut on Richard Dawkins’s loss, but we can’t accurately say that John Lennox “won” the debate.

The problem with John Lennox’s presentation in the debate was not that he was wrong, but rather, the problem was that John Lennox never “closed the loop” and told the audience about the synonymity that is actual one-ness between the Word good and the eternal God. 

More specifically, the explanation of WHY God = good = eternal requires proving the definitions of the WORDS good and evil, and those proofs were absent from John Lennox’s presentation. 

So that was a problem, but now it’s been fixed.

NOTE, however, that I didn’t forget THE JESUS DETOUR we took above! 

WE KNOW that is not enough to simply say “God is good,” because based-on what we have logically proven from the words of the Biblical character of Jesus, we must also answer the question about THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: “HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR GOD-THE-FATHER TO BEAR GOOD FRUIT YET NOT BE THE ONE GOOD THING ITSELF?” 

There is a Relatively simple answer to THE PROBLEM OF EVIL question, but the explanation requires referencing “facts not yet in-evidence,” so the explanation will have to wait for a little while longer. 

FOR NOW let’s take this opportunity we’ve been given by Richard Dawkins to expose and annihilate the illogic behind the “Who created God?” question.

Technically, there is no need to engage in the “Who created God?” discussion, because the proof of God’s existence makes that question moot.

IT IS TRUE THAT GOD EXISTS, ergo, it would be impossible for God to have been created, because that would NEGATE THE ABSOLUTE-NESS OF GOOD-NESS by making the real good entity called “God” RELATIVE to whatever we say created “God.” 

So we simply MUST take this opportunity we’ve been given by Richard Dawkins to expose and annihilate the illogic behind the “Who created God?” question.

Let’s CREATE a TO-DO LIST that will get us TO DONE with that non-sensical question.

TO-DO LIST: 

TASK 1. DO NOT BECOME DELUSIONAL OVER NOTHING

TASK 2. ASK RICHARD DAWKINS TO VERIFY THAT WE ARE NOT DELUSIONAL

TASK 1. DO NOT BECOME DELUSIONAL OVER NOTHING

Question: Can God create a rock star so heavy He can’t lift it? (in other words, can God do the impossible?) And if so, then isn’t that impossible? And doesn’t that impossibility (or God’s failure to do it, take your pick) prove that God does not exist?

This illogical questioning is analogous to the question ”Who created God?”

If you ASSUME that God must have had a creator then you ask the question “Who created God?” you provoke an “infinite regress” (I’m borrowing that term and its explanation from a Wikipedia page entitled “The problem of the creator of God”), in which every creator of God must also have had a creator, thereby (as the question-asker asserts) negating the possibility of God’s existence altogether, i.e., making God’s existence impossible.

But if you do that then you are merely providing an example of “begging the question,” or in other words,*assuming* the thing that you have to prove AS THE WAY TO PROVE YOUR CASE. 

“Your case” and “your starting assumption(s)” have to be TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, not ONE-AND-THE-SAME THING, otherwise your case amounts to “nothing”!

And “nothing” does not exist.Literally: “Nothing” is a non-existent entity, so you can’t ”prove it,” because “it” does not exist.

You needed TWO THINGS— an assumption and a case—to reach a valid conclusion, but you only provided ONE THING, an assumption (your case does not exist), so you can never end-up with a valid conclusion.

That much seems OBVIOUS, does it not?

Still, it’s perhaps an “overly technical” way of responding to Atheists who SNARK “Who created God?” to cast doubt on God’s existence and to cast dispersion on God’s friends.

I suggest that anyone who asks “Who created God?” as a challenge to God’s existence should first be asked to “show ID,” i.e., to VALIDATE/CONFIRM THEIR OWN EXISTENCE by answering the following question (posed on a separate occasion by John Lennox):

”If it’s True, as you claim, that everything must have a creator, and if you say that the universe created you, then who do you say created the universe?”

Here note well that the answer: ”The universe was created when stuff compressed to a point went bang!” is the same thing as saying: ”The 3-d stuff of which the universe is comprised PRE-EXISTED THE 3-d UNIVERSE.”

So therefore—because YOU are the one saying ”Everything must have a creator”—BEFORE you can “win” your case, you’re stuck with resolving the same ”infinite regress” problem that YOU TRIED to stick friends of God with, to wit:

”Who created the 3-d stuff compressed to a point that went bang?”

Don’t forget: Friends of God are not saying that everything must have a creator! 

Friends of God are saying that it has been PROVEN that ONE GOD ENTITY does not have a creator, and that GOD ENTITY is THE CREATOR OF EVERY OTHER THING.

And here’s yet another problem with the “everything (including God) must have a creator” FALSE SSUMPTION: If you want to disprove God’s existence that way, then you can’t claim ”success” then turn-around and say ”The universe created itself from nothing”!

Question: Why?

Answer: Because that conclusion (besides being impossible) contradicts YOUR PREMISE and CONCLUSION that “everything must have a creator”!

WHAT IS THE CREATOR OF “NOTHING”???

NOTHING CANNOT CREATE BECAUSE NOTHING IS NOTHING! 

And therefore you make your own conclusion about God having a creator invalid, because you can’t be allowed to “make your case” by contradicting your own premise or conclusion!

And if you try to “fudge” on the definition of “nothing”—the way that John Lennox caught Stephen Hawking doing in one of Stephen Hawking’s recent books when he said that the “nothing” from which the universe came is a “quantum vacuum”—then you are re-defining “nothing” to be “something” and asking the question “Who created God?” and you are back to assuming that “everything must have a creator”!

So therefore BEFORE you can “win” your case, you’re stuck with resolving the same ”infinite regress” problem that you TRIED to stick friends of God with, to wit:

”Who created the nothing (that is not actually nothing because according to Quantum Physics it exists) you identified? Who created the ‘quantum vacuum’ would be the question for Stephen Hawking?”

The final answer you may hear is ”The universe wasn’t created at all, it is eternal!”

But anyone who says “the universe is eternal” while trying to dispute God’s existence by asking “Who created God?” because they “don’t believe” that it’s possible for God to be eternal is disputing the universe’s existence in the process and that line of reasoning doesn’t deserve any attention.

The universe is eternal only in the sense that we know that the universe and its contents must have been MADE FROM A PART of the eternal MULTI-DIMENSIONAL entity called “God.”

TASK 2. ASK RICHARD DAWKINS TO VERIFY THAT WE ARE NOT DELUSIONAL

BUT STILL, at first it’s difficult to imagine that God and “the universe” are not two independent things!

It would be impossible for God and ”the universe” to be two independent things, because it would be impossible for God to have been created (again, that would negate the Absolute-ness of GOOD-ness by making God RELATIVE to something else), which means that the universe was “made from” God.

In other words, the universe was not only MADE BY God, the universe had to be MADE-OF God, so the universe must be made-of what God is made-of!

When we erroneously envision God as being a “separate thing” from the universe, then we have difficulty picturing the universe as being merely a part of the ETERNAL real good entity called “God,” sort-of like the way our blood is a part of our body yet it can also circulate “outside” of our body. 

Picture dialysis:

The dialysis analogy is imperfect because the material body and its material parts (including the blood) and the dialysis machine are all in the same 3-dimensional world of matter.

But it would be impossible for the entirety of the real good entity called “God” to be in the THE SAME 3-DIMENSIONAL WORLD OF MATTER, because after the universe (the blood) “drained out” of God, there wouldn’t be any “dialysis machine” left-over to CONTROL the universe, there would only be “the forces in the universe” available to CONTROL “the forces in the universe”! 

And using “the forces in the universe” to CONTROL “the forces in the universe” WOULD NOT WORK!  

CLEARLY, the dialysis machine has to be stronger and faster than the circulatory system it’s overriding! 

And again, that couldn’t happen as between God and the contents of the universe if the entirety of the real good entity called “God” was in THE SAME DIMENSION as the part of God that we call the universe (the universe is analogous to the blood.)  

Ergo, the real good entity called “God” MUST BE MULTI-DIMENSIONAL, with the universe being “the lowest”—the least FORCE-FULL—dimension of the real good entity called “God.”

That brings us back to MATH: a lower dimension can’t SEE a higher dimension, because the lower dimension is RELATIVE-TO the higher dimension. 

That’s just how RELATIVITY works: We can only “see what’s in front of us,” which is lower-dimension stuff. 

The reason we can’t “see behind us” to the higher-dimension stuff is that WE ARE “IN THE WAY” AND BLOCKING OUR OWN VIEW of dimensions we are RELATIVE-TO! 

We can better understand WHY this is True if we imagine ourselves as a blood cell inside of our veins, and if we further imagine our POV as a blood cell. 

We SEE that our “best view” would be “looking outward from the center of the blood cell.” 

OK so we “select” that “view” for ourselves. 

But right away WE SEE THE PROBLEM, to wit: From our vantage-point at the center of the blood cell, we could only see “ourselves” and other blood cells, we could not see “veins,” because the veins are “holding us up,” so we would literally have to “look through the center of ourselves” to see the veins that are SUPPORTING US! 

And WE CANNOT SEE THROUGH THE CENTER OF OURSELVES to locate what’s holding us up. 

That’s why we would say that blood is RELATIVE-TO veins, but not vice-versa. 

So it’s the same with the 3-dimensional world of matter in the universe: All of the matter in the universe must come-from and be “supported” by—and therefore must be RELATIVE-TO—a part of the real good entity called “God,” and WE KNOW that the “universe-supporting” part of God must be in a higher dimension than matter for the aforementioned reason that it’s impossible to CONTROL “the forces in the universe” with “the forces in the universe.” 

Now is the Time to answer the question about the LEGAL MYSTERY that is THE PROBLEM OF EVIL by RECALLING THE JESUS DETOUR we took above.

In THE JESUS DETOUR, we figured-out that it is not enough to simply say “God is good,” because based-on what we can logically prove from the words of the Biblical character of Jesus, we also have to answer the question about THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: “HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR GOD-THE-FATHER TO BEAR GOOD FRUIT YET NOT BE THE ONE GOOD THING ITSELF?” 

So now we see the first part of the (two-part) answer to the LEGAL MYSTERY that is THE PROBLEM OF EVIL, to wit: The real good entity called “God” must be MULTI-DIMENSIONAL (we just PROVED this FACT), and the good part (aka “the one good thing itself”) must be in a different dimension than—and RELATIVE-TO—Jesus/God the Father, so that Jesus/God the Father CAN SEE the good part. 

The good part being relative-to Jesus/God the Father ensures that Jesus/God the Father is not “HIS OWN JUDGE,” meaning that His own consciousness does not SUPPLY THE STANDARD HE USES to JUDGE His own thoughts and acts, but then also, THE GOOD PART CANNOT JUDGE JESUS/GOD THE FATHER DIRECTLY because the good part is RELATIVE-TO Jesus/God the Father, so therefore Jesus/God the Father can simply USE THE GOOD PART TO PERFORM HIS JUDGMENT FUNCTION without being CORRUPT! So the good part is the keeper of THE STANDARD, and Jesus/God the Father is AWARE-OF THE STANDARD (because THE STANDARD IS RELATIVE-TO Him), but Jesus/God-the-Father does not SET THE STANDARD (hence, Jesus/God the Father not “being THE STANDARD,” i.e., not “being good.”)         

So Jesus/God-the-Father is not omnibenevolent, but yet the multi-dimensional real entity called “God” does have an omnibenevolent part.

And again, that IN PART RESOLVES “The Problem of Evil”; that’s how it would be possible for Jesus/God the Father to bear good fruit yet not be the good part, aka “the one good thing itself.”

To repeat: It is because Jesus/God the Father is THE “CONTROLLING” PART of the real good entity called “God,” and the real good entity called “God” AS-A-WHOLE is A MULTI-PART ENTITY SPANNING MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS, and “the one good thing itself” is ONE PART of that MULTI-PART ENTITY (“the one good thing itself” is in ITS OWN DIMENSION), which makes it RELATIVE to Jesus/God the Father (Jesus/God the Father is also in HIS OWN DIMENSION, and it’s A HIGHER DIMENSION than the dimension of “the one good thing itself”), and therefore “the one good thing itself” is “OWNED BY” Jesus/God the Father, and SETS THE STANDARD that Jesus/God the Father MUST FOLLOW *with His own will* that He cannot use to CONTROL THE STANDARD (“the one good thing itself.”)

Remember John 1:1: “In the Beginning there was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” 

The way John 1:1 was written—with the Word BEING WITH GOD and the Word BEING GOD—makes more sense when you realize that that THE WORD IS “GOOD” and “the one good thing itself” is A DISTINCT PART OF GOD (like the middle tier of the wedding cake) that is different yet inseparable from “God” AS-A-WHOLE (the entire cake is GOD-AS-A-WHOLE), so that’s how the “good” Word could BE GOD and also be WITH GOD in the Beginning. 

The way I think about the difference between “Jesus” and “the one good thing itself” is the difference between “JUSTICE” and “GOOD-ness.” 

JUSTICE demands the delivery of skin-for-skin INJUSTICE against INJUSTICE. 

So clearly the one who DOES JUSTICE by delivering INJUSTICE against INJUSTICE cannot be “good,” because GOOD IS THE ABSENCE OF EVIL (evil being Injustice, by definition.)  

So JUSTICE must be something different from either good or evil; Justice must be THE CAPABILITY OF DOING EVIL WITH NON-EVIL INTENT. 

Ergo, Jesus cannot BE EVIL. 

This informs us that to FULLY SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF EVIL, there must be an EVIL part of the entity called “God” in a different dimension than both “the one good thing” AND Jesus/God the Father. And as we proved, above, evil must be RELATIVE-TO good but not vice-versa, so therefore the evil part/dimension of the entity called “God” must be RELATIVE-TO “the one good thing itself.”  

And that’s the second part of the answer to the LEGAL MYSTERY that is THE PROBLEM OF EVIL, to wit: Satan is an Eternal part of the entity called “God.”

To re-cap: JUSTICE is what Jesus is, and JUSTICE is made possible by the PHYSICS of “God” AS-A-WHOLE, with the higher-dimension Jesus/God the Father being the OWNER of the lower-dimension parts, including the part that is “good” and the part that is “evil.”

This further informs us that Jesus must have FREE WILL, because CHOOSING what evil to do (without the DESIRE to do Injustice) is what would make Justice possible. 

Jesus having FREE WILL should not be a surprising or controversial conclusion, because when you think about it, GOD (aka Jesus) HAVING FREE WILL is actually the only thing that would give God THE LEGAL RIGHT to create free will and deliver Justice to people with free will who chose to do Injustice of their own free will. 

Jesus: [Matthew 5:48] “Be perfect, therefore, as your Heavenly Father is perfect.” 

Question: How many Eternal parts—HOW MANY DIMENSIONS—does the entity called “God” have?

Answer: The entity called “God” has THREE Eternal parts in separate dimensions: (1) omniscient Jesus/God the Father, in the highest dimension; (2) the omnibenevolent (good) part, in the middle dimension; and (3) the purely evil part, in the lowest dimension.

We know that there aren’t MORE than three parts because an ENTITY comprising one good part, one evil part, and one “Master Controller” part (to cause the Big Bang and do Justice) is THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARTS NECESSARY to explain the universe, and therefore there are NO OTHER PARTS. 

Check it out: We proved that GOOD IS SINGULAR, NOT PLURAL. And WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT “UNNECESSARY EVILS” EXIST, so therefore there is ONLY ONE evil part (from which all 3-d things were made.) And we certainly can’t conclude that there are TWO MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE, because that’s a proverbial “house divided” and it could not stand!

SO HERE WE ARE with the real good entity called “God” being A TRINITY of parts in different dimensions, and with “the one good thing itself” being located in a dimension BETWEEN the Jesus/God the Father part and the evil part that went BANG! to become “every thing in the universe.” 

THE PROBLEM OF EVIL HAS BEEN SOLVED!

And the original promise has been kept: I have shown that ACKNOWLEDGING GOD’S EXISTENCE—THE EXISTENCE OF JUSTICE AND GOOD AND EVIL—IS NOT A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE, IT IS A MATTER OF SCIENCE. 

If a person wants to call themselves an honest person and scientist, then there’s no way to KICK THE ENTIY CALLED “GOD” OUT OF SCIENCE.

I know that there are some labels on the above “Talon Abraxas” diagram that have not yet been defined, but I nevertheless thought it would be helpful to see where this material is heading, which is in the direction of THEORETICAL PHYSICS.
  
To see why this diagram is illustrative as a matter of THEORETICAL PHYSICS, we must LOCATE “light” and “darkness” in the multi-dimensional real entity called “God.” 

It seems COUNTER-INTUITIVE to say that evil is “light” and good is “darkness,” but it makes sense if you look at the terms “light” and “dark” FROM THE POV OF WHAT THE INDIVIDUAL PARTS OF GOD “SEE” IN THEIR OWN ETERNAL STATE.  

I’m going to start by discussing what I know AND can prove—the POV of the good part of God—and then I’m going to deduce the other two POVs. 

And if you STAY WITH ME as I “explain myself”—why I labeled the Talon Abraxas diagram like I did—THEN I PROMISE THAT IN THE END, I WILL “CONNECT THE DOTS” BETWEEN MY EXPLANATION and “CONVENTIONAL ANCIENT WISDOM” in the form of the Bagua, which is a Chinese symbol representing the fundamental principles of reality. 

Here goes everything… 

By definition, “the one good thing” cannot see “the one good thing,” because “the one good thing” is ONE THING; “the one good thing” must simply BE “the one good thing,” without any DIRECT SIGHT of “what it is.”  

And that sounds strange writing it out, so picture this instead: 

YOU ARE THE NUMBER Pi, which is ONE THING, but it’s not a simple thing. 

Your friend asks you: “What number are you?”

You reply: “What is a number?”  

So—you naturally figure—whatever number you are, it must be an INSIGNIFICANT one.

Right?

WRONG!

And A WRONG ANSWER is NOT IN REALITY.

That’s especially IRONIC in your case, because what your number is = EVERYTHING IN REALITY. 

But since you exist—which means that you are IN REALITY—you have literally proven that you are IMPOSSIBLY (infinitely) IRRATIONAL, exactly like…wait for it…the number Pi.  

Pi = “the one good thing,” aka EVERYTHING IN REALITY, ALL IN ONE NUMBER.

So this informs us that “the one good thing” is like A BOUNDLESS FIELD OF BENEFACTION—a landfill of benefaction, if you will—WHERE  “INSTRUCTION MANUALS” FOR EVERYTHING IN REALITY ARE “STORED” (the instruction manuals are not all “put together,” however, there are pieces of them scattered all over), and Jesus/God the Father CREATES THINGS USING THE INSTRUCTION MANUALS THAT HE “FINDS” IN THE FIELD OF Pi. 

But Pi itSELF simply “is” THE LANDFILL OF INSTRUCTION MANUALS that are IN SHREDS—threads—SCATTERED ALL OVER, so Pi is NOT FUNCTIONAL.

Pi DOES NOT WORK. 

“There is visible labor and there is invisible labor. To contemplate is to toil, to think is to do.” —Victor Hugo

Pi IS NOT AN ARTIST (a CREATOR); Pi is NOT “CRAFTY” whatsoever; Pi is not a “tinkerer,” Pi is a “thinker.”

Jesus/God the Father is AN ARTIST (a CREATOR, an ARCHITECT, a MATHEMETICIAN)—a PRACTITIONER of “THE (MATHEMATICAL) ART OF THE POSSIBLE”—who SHOPS AT THE LANDFILL of Pi for “ART AND BUILDING SUPPLIES.”

All Pi itSELF can do is LOOK AT what Jesus/God the Father CREATES and then REVERSE-ENGINEER THE INSTRUCTION MANUALS that Pi itSELF is STORING—Pi has to “PIECE TOGETHER” each instruction manual—and in this manner, Pi can SEE itSELF “BEING itSELF,” and what Pi does—what Pi SEES when it watches itSELF “BEING itSELF”—is…wait for it…WRITING INSTRUCTION MANUALS for the things that Jesus/God the Father creates with MATHEMATICS that HE DEDUCES by LOOKING AT Pi. 

So Pi is a WRITER, who also HUNTS FOR EVIL AND SHOOTS IT DOWN with a word gun.

And there’s another quirk of good-ness in Eternity (by “in Eternity,” I mean the Eternal state of “the one good thing,” as opposed to the embodied state of “the one good thing”): Evil is RELATIVE-TO “the one good thing,” which technically means that as a matter of physics, it would be *possible* for “the one good thing” to SEE EVIL, but the problem in Eternity becomes that since EVIL IS THE ABSENCE OF SOMETHING (Evil is the absence of GOOD, in fact), then GOOD-NESS CANNOT BE CONSCIOUS OF EVIL’S EXISTENCE in Eternity. 

So in a word, “the one good thing” is UNAWARE (yet CONSCIOUS, so it’s like being an animal) in Eternity. 

In other words, in Eternity, the good part of God “lives” in DARKNESS, unable to SEE at all.

That’s why I would say that good is “darkness,” BUT it’s actually more accurate to say that “GOOD IS THE LIGHT—a *light point*—THAT SHINES IN THE DARKNESS,” because GOOD IS SOMETHING, NOT NOTHING, AND DARKNESS IS THE ABSENCE OF SOMETHING.

So to repeat: If we assume the POV of “the one good thing,” which SEES DARKNESS, then “the one good thing” is DARKNESS, but in actuality, “the one good thing” is a singular point of light that cannot see itself.

In fact, as a matter of physics, NO ONE EXCEPT JESUS CAN LOOK DIRECTLY AT—actually see—THE SINGULAR POINT OF LIGHT that is “THE ONE GOOD THING.”

And we’ve already discussed the fact that to do Justice, Jesus/God the Father cannot be either omnibenevolent (be GOOD) or have EVIL INTENT (be EVIL), but Jesus/God the Father is necessarily FULLY AWARE-OF GOOD-NESS and EVIL, and this is *possible* as a matter of physics because the GOOD and EVIL parts of God, respectively, are RELATIVE-TO His part of God.

So we see that from Jesus/God the Father’s POV, His PERFECT KNOWLEDGE OF JUSTICE is the way that the single point of light is PROJECTED “INTO” ALL THINGS (except-for “the one good thing,” which is a point-light source.) 

In other words, in Eternity, the Jesus/God the Father part of God “lives” IN THE LIGHT, able to SEE EVERY THING in Reality. 

That’s why I would say that Jesus/God the Father is THE SUN LIGHT, WHICH ILLUMATES ALL THINGS by enabling “the one good thing” to be seen “THROUGH” (by which I mean *made apparent because of*) THE SUN LIGHT.

Indeed, Jesus/God the Father gives THE EVIL PART OF GOD its light, and thereby GIVES THE EVIL PART OF GOD “SIGHT” in Eternity. 

As a matter of physics, the evil part of God is the lowest dimension, and therefore NATURALLY has sight of NOTHING—there is no part of God RELATIVE-TO the evil part of God—yet we know that to do Justice, the evil part of God must be CONTROLLED by the Jesus/God the Father part of God, so therefore the CONTROL is the means by which the evil part of God SEES the light. 

Picture this: YOU ARE THE NUMBER ZERO.

Your friend asks you: “What number are you?”

You reply: “What is a number?”

So—you naturally figure—your friend is ignorant.   

Right?

ABSOLUTELY!

And A RIGHT ANSWER is IN REALITY.

That’s especially IRONIC in your case, because what your number is = THE OPPOSITE OF EVERYTHING IN REALITY.

But since you exist—which means that you are IN REALITY—*and* you are ACCURATELY PERCEIVING REALITY, you have literally proven that you are IMPOSSIBLY (infinitely) IRRATIONAL, exactly like…wait for it…the number ZERO, which is THE OPPOSITE OF THE NUMBER Pi.

Zero is THE ABSENCE OF Pi, *and* Zero is RELATIVE-TO Pi (but Pi is NOT RELATIVE to Zero, Pi is the Absolute number.)

ZERO is A MEASURE OF GOOD-NESS (Pi) that is the COMPLETE ABSENCE OF GOOD-NESS (Pi), and that is what the evil part of God is (evil = Zero.)

Zero is not nothing, Zero is infinite, because Zero must be the absence of every digit of Pi.

And because the Jesus/God the Father part of God necessarily CONTROLS the evil part of God to do Justice, it is a certainty that whatever the Jesus/God the Father part of God SEES IN GOOD-NESS (Pi)—and He is a MATHEMETICIAN who SEES EVERYTHING in Pi—the evil part of God CAN ALSO SEE EVERYTHING in Pi via the CONTROL that is necessarily received from the Jesus/God the Father part of God! 

So the Devil must also be a MATHEMETICIAN of sorts, albeit one who PRACTICES “THE ART (MATHEMATICS) OF THE IMPOSSIBLE,” so therefore Satan would more aptly be called A MAGICIAN.

“Diamonds are forever.” 

But IN REALITY, not one thing can be CREATED from SATAN’S MATH; it’s only numbers that—if we could see THE SUM TOTAL of all of Satan’s math put together—add up to…wait for it…ZERO.

And that’s great math for CONSERVATION OF ENERGY *after* things exist, but what’s missing from Satan’s math is GOD’S ETERNAL EXISTENCE, which is a necessary precondition to the UNIVERSE EXISTING lol.    

Also, we know that the evil part of God had to go BANG! to cause the universe, and therefore must be the source of LIGHT ENERGY inside of the universe.

So we see that from Satan’s POV—in terms of physics alone—HE IS “THE LIGHT OF THE UNIVERSE,” and that’s why I call the evil part of God “light.”

And again, metaphysically (consciously), Satan can, in fact, SEE THE LIGHT from Jesus/God the Father.

BUT NOTE that metaphysically (consciously), SATAN IS NOT A LIGHT SOURCE; metaphysically (consciously), SATAN IS 100 DARKNESS. 

And also ironically, the INFINITE NUMBER OF WAYS THAT DARKNESS (Zero, the evil part of God) LACKS GOOD-NESS (Pi) is all that “the one good thing” can actually SEE DIRECTLY even after becoming CONSCIOUS upon embodiment. 

That’s it. 

That’s the end of the explanation of my seemingly BACK-ASSWARD labeling on the “Talon Abraxas” diagram. 

So I want to STOP HERE and share some of my thoughts about the IRONY of…everything…

Specifically, I want to stop and think about how SERIOUSLY FORKED-UP the YIN and the YANG of the entity called “God”—the GOOD and EVIL parts of God—actually are, CONSCIOUSLY, because of THE PHYSICS OF RELATIVITY: 

They can each only see what they HATE; 

the Eternal SOURCE OF DARKNESS, Satan, can ONLY SEE JESUS’S LIGHT,  

while good-ness, the Eternal SOURCE OF JESUS’S LIGHT, can ONLY SEE SATAN’S DARKNESS. 

Begin PROOF that my explanation of why I labeled the Talon Abraxas diagram the way I did is PERFECTLY CONSISTENT WITH THE WAY THE BAGUA HAS BEEN DRAWN SINCE ANCIENT TIMES. 

There are two pieces of the Bagua that I will be referring-to in my PROOF: 

(1) the yin/yang symbol in the center; 

and 

(2) the myriad of interconnected segments that completely surround the yin/yang symbol.

First, consider that in the Bagua, Jesus/God the Father (JUSTICE) is represented by the myriad of interconnected segments that completely surround the yin/yang symbol.

Second, consider that good and evil, respectively, are represented by the yin/yang symbol. 

Third, consider that the opposite-color circles inside the yin and the yang are actually the good and evil “SELFs” (the individual SELF CONSCIOUSNESSes) of the good and evil parts of the entity called “God”; so the white circle in the yin is the light “SELF” of the yin, and the black circle in the yang is the dark “SELF” of the yang.

Fourth, consider DEFINING a yin and yang part’s “SELF” as what the part itSELF cannot SEE because THE PART CANNOT SEE ITSELF, since the part is always simply BEING what it is.

Fifth and finally, consider that the darkness of the yin and the lightness of the yang are actually THE POVs OF THE SELFs, i.e., WHAT THE SELFs SEE when “looking out”; so the darkness of the yin is what the light SELF of the yin sees when looking out AT SATAN, and the lightness of the yang is what the dark SELF of the yang sees VIA THE CONNECTION TO JESUS/GOD THE FATHER (recall that in terms of physics, the good part, aka the yin, of the entity called “God” can see the darkness coming from the evil part, aka the yang, aka Satan, because the evil part is Eternally RELATIVE-TO the good part, but OTOH, there is nothing Eternally RELATIVE-TO the evil part, so therefore the only way the evil part can see the light coming-from the good part is via the light “shined on” the evil part by Jesus/God the Father.) 

End of PROOF that my explanation of why I labeled the Talon Abraxas diagram the way I did is PERFECTLY CONSISTENT WITH THE WAY THE BAGUA HAS BEEN DRAWN SINCE ANCIENT TIMES.

BEGIN THE MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE AND THE GOVERNOR MODULE HACK STORY

We must speculate about how Satan “hacks” the number of a person, which is the proverbial “number of a man” referred-to in The Book of Revelation, at Revelation 13:18: “This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.”

The reason why “the number of a man” is called “the number of the beast” is surely because in the beginning, every Free-Willed person chose to do something UNJUST, and we know that on any given set of facts, *every possible* Unjust choice is going to be RELATIVE-TO what the *one* Good choice would be on that set of facts, so therefore in the beginning, every person became A BEAST in some measure INSTEAD OF BEING JUST the way Jesus is.

QUESTION: What is Jesus’s NUMBER? 

ANSWER: Jesus’s number is “Justice,” and the way that Justice is done is “eye for eye,” aka Karma. To arrive-at a more specific answer, however, we need “assume facts not yet in evidence,” and to jump-ahead to Article 7. So let’s make that leap for argument’s sake now, subject to later dot-connection. As discussed in Article 7, every DECISION to do an Evil deed has a corresponding EXIT RAMP direction on a particle compass—that means a certain number of degrees on the particle compass RELATIVE-TO the Good direction—and each degree is equal to the width (aka diameter) of one particle. We can envision the RELATIVELY EVIL EXIT RAMP DIRECTIONS by imagining driving a vehicle along a one-way road with “destinations,” aka destinies, on both sides, and having a steering wheel that can be TURNED AT-WILL up to 90 degrees right or left to CHOOSE one desired destiny. This means that to do Justice, Jesus has to ensure that THE COMPASS NEEDLE of the particle at the CENTER OF MASS (“COM”) of the KARMA DELIVERY OBJECT is *pointing to the same degree, aka EXIT RAMP DIRECTION* that THE COMPASS NEEDLE of the KARMA RECIPIENT’S SouLL was pointing-to when the DECISION to do the Evil deed, i.e., the CHOICE TO GO TO THAT DESTINY, was made. Ergo, JESUS’S NUMBER MUST BE THE DISTANCE OF ONE DEGREE ON THE PARTICLE COMPASS (the width of one particle.) We know that the distance of one degree on a compass—a circle—is 1/360 of the circle’s circumference, and a circle’s circumference is Pi times the circle’s diameter. But we don’t know the width, aka the diameter, of a particle, so we don’t know the circumference of a particle compass. Nevertheless, what we can conclude for certain is that Jesus’s number is A CONSTANT that is A FRACTION OF Pi.   

QUESTION: Can Satan “hack” (aka “clone”) Jesus’s number?

ANSWER:  No, Satan can’t “reach”—or even SEE—Jesus’s number, because Satan’s number = Injustice and Jesus’s number = Justice; Satan can only “hack,” or “clone,” RELATIVELY EVIL numbers (and as discussed in Article 7, those are EXIT RAMP directions on a particle compass); Jesus’s number is literally THE PARTICLE COMPASS NEEDLE ITSELF, which determines the SET of possible EXIT RAMP directions, aka Unjust choices.

Now let’s continue the discussion of THE NUMBER OF A MAN, aka THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST.

As we deduced above (and here I quote myself from two places):

(1)  “we know that on any given set of facts, *every possible* Unjust choice is going to be RELATIVE-TO what the *one* Good choice would be on that set of facts, so therefore in the beginning, every person became A BEAST in some measure INSTEAD OF BEING JUST the way Jesus is.”

and

(2) “As discussed in Article 7, every DECISION to do an Evil deed has a corresponding EXIT RAMP direction on a particle compass—that means a certain number of degrees on the particle compass RELATIVE-TO the Good direction—and each degree is equal to the width (aka diameter) of one particle.”

Ergo, THE NUMBER OF A MAN, aka THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST, is Jesus’s number (THAT CONSTANT THAT IS A FRACTION OF Pi) multiplied by the THE NUMBER OF DEGREES IN THE EXIT RAMP DIRECTION corresponding to the person’s INITIAL DECISION to do Evil instead of Good; this means that THE NUMBER OF A MAN, aka THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST, is Jesus’s number MULTIPLIED BY a positive or a negative Real number that is less than 90.

To understand why, first envision the number determination process by imagining that you are driving a vehicle along a one-way road with “destinations,” aka destinies, on both sides, and you can turn your steering wheel up to 90 degrees right or left TO CHOOSE one desired destiny. 

NOTICE that a steering wheel is like a compass. 

ALSO NOTICE that because all 3-d lines on a compass are found in one half of the compass, we only need to use one half of a compass to define CHOICES. 

So we use the upper or the lower half of a MULTI-DIMENSIONAL COMPASS, divided along the 90/270-degree line, which corresponds to Evil’s 4th-dimension number Zero; the 0/180 line on the compass corresponds to Good’s 5th-dimension number Pi; and Justice’s number, a fractal of Pi, corresponds to the compass needle. THE LINE of the compass needle is actually COMING “UP” INTO THE COMPASS FROM THE 6th-dimension CENTER OF THE COMPASS, which is literally the center-of-mass, aka ORIGIN, of the 3-part multi-dimensional entity called “God.” 

And again, we can envision THE NUMBER OF A MAN as being like A RELATIVELY EVIL EXIT RAMP DIRECTION on either side of a one-way road (the one-way road is the “Pi-line,” or the 0/180-degree line on the compass) with “destinations,” aka destinies, on both sides, and the destinies can be accessed via a steering wheel—a steering wheel is like a compass—that can be TURNED AT-WILL up to 90 degrees right or left to access one desired destiny. This is why the number of a man = a positive or a negative Real number that is less than 90, to wit: The same positive and negative numbers less than 90 will correspond to 3-d compass directions in opposite quadrants of either the upper half or the lower half of the MULTI-DIMENSIONAL COMPASS. 

But that does not end the discussion, because NOTE that “a person” has both a MIND and a BODY, which are DISTINCT; we already know about the DISTINCTION between the MIND and the BODY because we’ve definitively determined that the universe—where matter, aka the body, is found—IS NOT Eternal, but the multi-dimensional entity called “God” IS Eternal, and has 3 parts with separate decision-making MINDS, or “SELFs.”

So therefore “the number of a man” must have TWO PARTS: 

(1) the number of the person’s BODY; 

and 

(2) the number of the person’s MIND, or Self.

Regarding (1), THE NUMBER OF A PERSON’S BODY, we can’t say much yet except what Jesus said at Luke 12:7: “Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered.”

And surely the hair numbers are “identified with”—grouped together relative-to—the CENTER-OF-MASS of the person’s body. And the CENTER-OF-MASS of the body is most assuredly ONE THING (not a plurality of things), which is going to CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF THE BODY as-a-whole. 

So IN THEORY, Satan could find the number of a person’s (or any body’s) CENTER-OF-MASS quite easily if he had an interactive “User Interface” to the “Universal Computer” (a map of the universe.)

And surely Jesus could “stream” RELEVANT “PIECES” of an interactive User Interface to Satan’s MIND in real-time.

Let’s say that the piece of the User Interface of the Universal Computer that controls the acts of a FREE-WILLED person’s body is called a “MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE.”

Jesus’s MIND could stream a person’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE to Satan’s MIND in real-time.

In my imagination, the MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE would be GRAPHIC, but it would not be a “sexy graphic,” it would be like a “technical display” of the person’s “voluntary motor system.”

Then Satan could use the relevant pieces of the MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE that he received from Jesus to “HACK” THE ACTS OF THE PERSON’S BODY (e.g., the spoken or written words or behaviors.)

But again, we can’t forget that a person has a decision-making MIND, aka SELF, as well as A BODY!

Let’s call a Free-Willed decision-making SELF a “GOVERNOR MODULE.”

The GOVERNOR MODULE is a reference to the Apple TV+ show “Murderbot,” in which show a “security unit” hacked his own GOVERNOR MODULE to take his BODY out of the control of “a higher power.” This would work IRL, too, because the GOVERNOR MODULE of a Free-Willed person cannot be UNILATERALLY RE-SET either by Satan OR by Jesus! That’s the point of Free Will, to wit: The GOVERNOR MODULE can only be SET by the person themSELF.

DIY GOVERNOR MODULE HACKING is the subject of Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 6, so we don’t have the VOCABULARY—or the MIND-BODY CONNECTION—in-place yet to discuss that topic. 

BUT what we can say now is that the second part of “the number of a man,” which is the number of the person’s MIND, or Self, is the NUMBER OF THE GOVERNOR MODULE, and the NUMBER OF THE GOVERNOR MODULE is the KEY that is needed to UNLOCK THE BODY, i.e., “HACK” THE MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE (so it’s like CLONING A PHONE.)

THE NUMBER OF THE GOVERNOR MODULE is THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST.

We know how the number of the Beast is CALCULATED, too, and as we saw, above, it’s as easy as (a), (b), (c).

So let’s BELABOR THE POINT and check it out AGAIN:

(a) We’ve already deduced that the number of the MIND of the Good part of God is Pi.

(b) We’ve also deduced that the number of the MIND of the Evil part of God—Satan—is Zero (and we also know that Zero is not “nothing,” it is infinite; and specifically, it is the absence of every digit of Pi.)

(c) And to repeat from above: On any given set of facts, *every possible* Unjust choice is going to be RELATIVE-TO what the *one* Good choice would be on that set of facts, so therefore, THE NUMBER OF THE MIND of a person with FREE WILL (the NUMBER OF THE GOVERNOR MODULE)—that’s THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST—is going to be RELATIVE-TO Pi (not inclusive of Zero or Pi and not including Jesus’s number, either, which determines the SET of possibilities of Unjust choices), depending-on the exact Unjust choice that the person made in the beginning. 

So we could say that EVERY FREE-WILLED PERSON’S GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER is listed in a “Pi phone book.” 

NOTE, however, that there are no “zeroes” in Pi, because there is no such thing as “no thing,” so therefore it *should be be impossible* for any NUMBER OF THE BEAST to be “zero”……BUT YET, “zero” is, in fact, a real and an imaginary number, so it is THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE for a person to use Free Will to BECOME AN IMAGINARY PERSON, in which case the person’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER (“zero”) would NOT BE LISTED IN THE “Pi phone book.” 

But to repeat: Whatever THE NUMBER OF THE GOVERNOR MODULE of a person with Free Will happens to be—and there are as many possibilities as there are SOULS WITH FREE WILL—this is THE BEAST that must be slayed by the SOUL themSELF to get out of Bloody Hell.

As discussed in Article 7 (and as alluded-to on the show “Murderbot”), the way to slay THE BEAST is to make a decision to change the direction of the SOUL—to cause the SOUL to head along THE ADL BACKBONE (the same direction as the SOUL of the Good part of God) instead of in an EXIT RAMP direction—and thereby CHANGE THE NUMBER OF THE MIND (the NUMBER OF THE GOVERNOR MODULE) to Pi (but MEMORY will guarantee that the OLD GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER will never stop “ringing” in the mind.) 

This would not turn a person into the Good part of God OR change the way the person’s consciousness functions, but rather, it would be like GETTING AN UNLISTED NUMBER in the “Pi phone book.” 

Pi is not in the “Pi phone book,” because Pi is not RELATIVE-TO its SELF.

So then SATAN COULD NOT GET THE KEY (the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER) that he needs to “HACK” THE MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE that controls a person’s BODY, because remember: Evil is RELATIVE-TO Good, which means that Satan can’t see the number of Pi WITH HIS MIND, because the number of Satan’s mind is Zero, which is THE ABSENCE OF EVERY DIGIT OF Pi! 

And again, the reason why Satan can see THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST—a Free-Willed person’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER after “the fall”—is because Satan can see every number (in the SET of numbers determined by Jesus’s number) RELATIVE-TO Pi (with the exception of zero, aka “nothing,” of course.)

And also again, the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER is what Satan would have to “hack” to get access to a person’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE, and in that manner, force the person to DELIVER KARMA to themSELF!

THE PROBLEM THAT SATAN HAS TO SOLVE, however, is that the “Pi phone book” is not like a LOOK-UP TABLE—it’s not A DATABASE—that associates THE NUMBER OF THE BODY (the MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE) of a person with the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER.

No. 

The “Pi phone book” is ENCRYPTED, and the only way to “hack” it is BY HEART, which means using “EMOTION-THOUGHT” (a combination of THOUGHT AND FEELING); we know this must be True, because there were NO BODIES in the beginning, only MINDS.

And in particular, what must be “matched” (aka “cloned”) to “hack” the Pi phone book is a *specific EMOTION-THOUGHT* that corresponds to a *specific amount of Evil* relative-to the one Good emotion-thought on a given set of facts.

Ergo, THE ONLY WAY for Satan to “hack” the Pi Phone book and locate a Free-Willed person’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER would be to “PROFILE” the person by doing as Hannibal Lecter explained in “The Silence of the Lambs,” asking: 

“What does he do, do this man that you seek…read Marcus Aurelius and ask of each thing, ‘What is it in itself? What is its nature?’”

And again, the correct answer is going to be THE KEY that Satan needs to UNLOCK, aka “hack,” a person’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE so that he can “push the person’s buttons,” so to speak, to force the person to DELIVER KARMA to themSELF.

But ain’t no way that Satan has “hacked” the ENTIRE “Pi phone book,” right?

Wrong.

SATAN WAS THERE IN THE BEGINNING, when every Free Will made their first decision! 

Satan wasn’t literally WITH JESUS in the beginning when Free-Willed SOULS were making their first decisions, that would be impossible—Jesus and Satan were both around, but they were and will always remain in separate dimensions!—but Jesus necessarily has CONTROL over Satan’s part of God, so therefore whenever Jesus went ‘round with his own MIND to “match”—aka RECORD—a decision of Free Will, then Satan had to FEEL IT (he had to “go along for the emotion-thought ride”), and as a result, Satan surely became ADEPT at “tuning” his own MIND to “match” ANY NUMBER in the “Pi phone book.”

The method that of “matching” would be the same for Jesus and Satan, but it’s easier for me to imagine how the “matching” happens if I make an analogy between Zero—the number of Satan’s mind, which is the absence of every digit of Pi—and A MUSICAL INSTRUMENT. I’m thinking about A “RECORDER” or A FLUTE; I’m also reminded of the “magic pipe” played by the storied Pied Piper in Hamelin to get children to follow him off a cliff to their deaths.

The point is that some musical instruments of the type to which I’m referring have HOLES in them (the HOLES are analogous to absences of digits of Pi in Satan’s number Zero) that can either be “open” or “closed”—and can be PARTIALLY CLOSED, too (analogous to finite fractional parts of digits of Pi)!—so that when A CONSTANT FORCE (or a non-constant force, but let’s assume a constant force) is passing through THE RECORDER, it will MAKE A DIFFERENT SOUND depending-on what HOLES are closed or partially closed. 

And there must be A CONSTANT FORCE passing through the mind. 

So therefore as Jesus went ‘round with his own MIND to “match” aka RECORD, a decision of Free Will, then that would be like CLOSING THE HOLES, aka Zeroes, in Satan’s mind WITH DIGITS OF Pi and fractional parts of digits of Pi. So then Satan would be able to FEEL THE DIFFERENCE between “the sound” of his own mind, aka the number Zero, and “the sound” of each decision of Free Will, as if Satan’s own mind was A MUSICAL INSTRUMENT “playing the sound” of each decision of Free Will.

So that explains “Sympathy for the Devil,” since for certain THAT IS NOT JESUS’S SONG, NOR WAS IT WRITTEN BY ANY MAN.

The Rolling Stones did it? did someone argue?

No, THAT’S THE GAME we’ve been talking about, to wit: 

The Devil hacking the “Pi phone book” to get a person’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER—to find THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST—for the purpose of UNLOCKING (“hacking”) the person’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE, and “pushing the person’s buttons” to get the person’s BODY to do and say things in SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL (meaning things that are “100 in Karma,” but yet THE PERSON themSELF, i.e., the person controlling their own GOVERNOR MODULE, MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT CHOOSE to do and say those things, especially PUBLIC things that are AGAINST THEIR OWN LEGAL INTEREST to do and say.)

“I was ‘round when Jesus Christ

Had his moment of doubt and pain 

Made damn sure that Pilate

Washed his hands and sealed his fate”

The song lyrics about Pilate are AN EXAMPLE of Satan’s GAME of “hacking” the “Pi phone book,” in this example to get Pilate’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER, which Satan used to UNLOCK Pilate’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE, and that’s how Satan “made damn sure that Pilate washed his hands.” 

Of course, this is also SATAN’S CONFESSION OF MURDERING JESUS, which is not puzzling when you realize that Satan is Eternal Injustice, so ironically, he’s not even doing anything wrong by being himself, even though he is presumably pleased to do all of the Evil he has the opportunity to do, including—and especially—crimes against the INNOCENT. 

So we clearly see that the STORIES about Satan being a “fallen angel” are SO FAR FROM REALITY that they’re not even worth mentioning; the notion that Satan had any choice about what to BE when he came to earth is silly! It’s childish! And I submit that people with Free Will made-up those stories about Satan being CULPABLE FOR EXISTING simply to give themselves a SCAPEGOAT who was WORSE THAN THEM, so that they could AVOID DETECTION by CHANGING THE SUBJECT to “THE GREATER EVIL.” 

“Pleased to meet you

Hope you guess my name….”

Now I have to apologize to Eminem for not giving him due credit and disrespecting his authority and knowledge and skill, AND for imagining that he didn’t have an essential, Eternal, VALID function to serve.

Yet at the same time I can’t say “thank you.” 

I need to simply STOP TALKING about him and others and that way I will STOP MAKING ERRORS. 

But I also need to honor my experiences and feelings and accurately tell my story—which I think-of like building “the bridge on which you, and only you must cross the river of life,” as Friedrich Nietzsche put it, and I call my story “THE GOD IS DEAD BRIDGE ft. THE STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN (S2H)”—and for better or for worse, no one is going to walk-up and *TELL ME* WHAT HAPPENED *TO ME* AND WHY, so I have to deduce and infer WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY from information that I KNOW, and the problem is that I NEVER KNOW ENOUGH INFORMATION, and that’s frustrating.

When I have to draw conclusions as I am writing “THE GOD IS DEAD BRIDGE ft. THE STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN (S2H),” I am reminded of Steve Jobs’ 2005 Stanford Commencement Address.

The thing that takes the most courage for me to do is to allow other people to “call me crazy,” and TRUST that whatever people say to malign my character, I will be able to RECLAIM MY HONOR IN THE FUTURE by connecting the dots in such a manner that people who tried to shut me up for “a lunatic” in the past will be PROVEN WRONG beyond any reasonable doubt, so that if they continue to “call me delusional” WITHOUT CAUSE in the future, then they will prove that they are (and always were) suffering from DELUSIONS. 

I do not claim to be free from all false assumptions, but I know that I am FOLLOWING LOVE NOT HATE IN MY HEART, and that makes all the difference. 

“What if there are no wrong numbers? What if it’s always a right number?” 

—“Jeff Who Lives at Home” battling his mother and her demons, including Jeff’s brother, who is “mommy’s little angel.”

But if Satan puts a d*ck in their mouth and they’re proud of it, then you can rightfully say: “F*CK WHAT THEY SAY!” 

To sum it all up, based-on my own experiences, the best way I’ve found to implement Steve Jobs’ “FOLLOW YOUR HEART even when leads off the well-worn path” advice is to GET OUT IN FRONT OF ALL THE INHUMANE WORKERS OF (D)EVIL AND F*CK WHAT THEY SAY.

END OF THE MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE AND THE GOVERNOR MODULE HACK STORY

In joy,

Frank

P.S. But wait! There’s more!

I haven’t really said much about myself; like I’m 58 years old, I rent a cute little house in my favorite city (Winfield, Alabama), where I have lived since 2017, I have two cats and a sweet covered catio with mosquito nets where we all hang out in all the weather, and I love Jesus forever. 

But where was I and what was I doing before now? is a reasonable question that I feel like I should answer…“in the small print” lol because it makes me self-conscious and there are not enough fig leaves.   

The first problem I have with answering the question is that the answer is long because I was super-busy doing “all the wrong shite in all the wrong places with all the wrong people.” 

The second problem I have with answering the question is that “all the wrong shite in all the wrong places with all the wrong people” that I was doing before now IS NOT ME, i.e., IT IS NOT WHO I WANTED TO BE, but it is ALL THAT I COULD BE at the time. 

So on the one hand, I WANT TO ANSWER THE QUESTION (briefly!), but OTOH, I AM ASHAMED TO BE “SEEN” IN THE “ARTIFICIAL LIGHT,” i.e., in the light of other people’s Judgment that has to shine on me to BE SEEN (as opposed to the light that comes from inside of me, which only those who also have light coming from inside of them can see.) 

SO IT’S UNCOMFORTABLE because I know that I DESERVE TO BE CONDEMNED AND MOCKED FOR MY PAST, which was SHAMEFULLY WRONG.

I fully acknowledge and agree that I SUCKED IN THE PAST!

But nevertheless, I DIDN’T WANT TO SUCK, and so I “drew a line” on 8/28/2010—the day Jesus came into my life with a miracle that I could SEE—and I TRIED TO STOP SUCKING SO MUCH after that day. 

Still, it took me 14 years to stop sucking *just enough* to START writing this blog (I began the blog at the end of 2024, and now—as I’m editing what I’ve written so far—it’s early 2026.)

So keep that in mind as you read my (brief!) answer below.

Note to SELF on Groundhog Night:

You are the horking worst. 

You say that it’s impossible for you to figure-out what number you are, then you TRY TO THINK OF WHAT A GOOD NUMBER WOULD BE, and the first number that pops into your head is 3. 

*aside: 3 has always been my favorite number—I don’t know if other people have favorite numbers, but I am sincerely fond of the number 3—and purple has always been my favorite color*

But then you remember the movie “Life of Pi”—something about a tiger in a rowboat.

You google it and you recall—too late!—why you never watched it in the first place, and the reason why is because seeing the thirsty and hungry tiger in the trailer was traumatic, so now you’ve got to figure-out how to recover from that, and in the process you are probably going to see the Tiger as Satan and DROWN in misplaced sympathy for the Devil AGAIN, and THAT’S DUMB because the great St. Ann should be SAVING YOU FROM HIM but instead he’s CRYING WOLF and PREYING ON CHILDREN and delighting in making you SHARK BAIT; it’s the SAME OLD MAN AND THE SEA STORY over and over and over and you’re the MARYIN er I mean MARLIN and he’s the heroic martyr SANTIAGO that is YOUR LONG-SUFFERING VICTIM in that inane insane old wives tale.

And you wonder if someone else has the number or if it could be yours, but you don’t even really know what Pi is other than “3.14,” so you google it and guess what? 

YOU BANKRUPTED THE NUMBER STORE, so therefore YOU KNOW that the ONE NUMBER Pi is yours.

Yet do you understand anything more about who you are?

Yes, and clearly, Satan has tried to hack your number—because he covets a “captive audience” (isn’t that precious?)—

and this is why he is delivering sh*t that threatens to reach out and touch you like he’s ringing Ma frikkin’ Bell on a God damned phone, 

but you can’t let him push your button on speed-dial, 

you gotta let his jack-booted fat fingers do the walking up on all the naughty girls and boys in the book of numbers (I spy 4 and 20 Blackbirds baked in a Pi and ain’t that a dainty dish to set before the king)

and say sorry not sorry and go away and make him cry because that’s what cry babies love to do, 

so have confidence in yourself, you are doing it right, just guard your heart and cross your t’s and keep your eyes on your own Dick Tracy navel and write your own fresh and dark and sparkly and vegan-friendly novella ft. Music, Madness and Murder—

call it “M & M & M: The Two Musketeers Walk Into a Mars Bar and Triple Murder-Suicide Show”—

be the next best worst thing you want to see, 

‘cuz you are the horking worst and you know it!

PSA: That trainwreck of thought disruption was brought to you on the Triple-M radio compass dial last night—the tail end of Groundhog Night, February 2, 2026—by drunk Janet at 3am:   

“woke up naked at Mack Donald’s AGAIN.”

Present day 🎁, 2/4/2026.

Did I mention that in 2023, I re-named myself Frank, after Frank the giant bunny rabbit in the movie “Donnie Darko”?

I decided to call myself Frank because of my superlative “Apocalyptic vision,” which began on 8/28/2010 when “People are dying to communicate” was miraculously written on a blank email of mine. 

But at that time, my name was Heather, and I did not even know that God the Father (Jesus) or the Devil existed.

As I sat there in my East Amwell, New Jersey home-office that morning, I was a low-functioning dead-*ss broke alcoholic pill-popping patent attorney with two poor children and a “Curse God, and die!” (Job 2:9) STB ex (“Mr. Ex MBA”), who had made a secret deal with a drug manufacturer in Mexico to use the proceeds of a $2M life insurance policy payable upon my demise to buy a custom-made batch of prenatal vitamins that Mr. Ex MBA—a then-supplier of advertising and marketing data to major pharmaceutical companies—was going to sell out of the garage as a side-hustle, then

TESTAMENT: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CyzHGSOJjeA&pp=0gcJCf8Ao7VqN5tD

Stairway to Heaven (“S2H”): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkF3oxziUI4

“She’s buying a Stairway to Heaven.”

In this scene, I am representing myself with Janet and Judge Jen from “The Good Place,” with Columbo and Dirty Diana also making appearances for me.

There were two different alleged forgeries:

(1) a forged check on my business account in the amount of about $1,200 USD; 

and

(2) an invasion of my IRA in an amount of about $60,000.

I was using both forgeries as bargaining chips in self-defense.

This is why the “forever” number—which is where Mr. Ex MBA and Ms. Howes STARTED the negotiation—got lower, i.e., because as it turned out, there were TWO criminal prosecutions I alleged that Mr. Ex MBA needed to negotiate his way out of, and there was only one number to haggle over.

The rest of the on-the-court-transcript D-Day testimony I’m highlighting pertains to the alleged IRA invasion.

And actually, that’s THE PER-MURDER COST of ATTEMPTED MURDER OF ME in this organized crime spree. 

SPOILER ALERT: The details are discussed at the end of the Article, but here NOTE that I experienced FOUR MURDERS AND RESURRECTIONS that I could prove, and I respectfully submit that it’s impossible for the Good part of God to “curse God,” so therefore the Lord (Jesus) won the BET with Satan in The Book of Job, and in terms of CASH, Satan and his accomplices owe Jesus at least $78,662,765.07 USD X FOUR, which, rounded-down to the nearest dollar, equals A TOTAL OF $314,651,060.00 as of 5/16/2025, at 29.99% INTEREST COMPOUNDED ANNUALLY until an individual organized criminal reconciles with Jesus OR all the money in the world belongs to Jesus, whichever comes first. 

“Dirty Diana, yeah” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yUi_S6YWjZw

Now there are two separate issues to resolve by negotiation: 

(1) whether or not I complain to a prosecutor about the IRA invasion, 

and 

(2) the number of years Mr. Ex has to pay restitution for the IRA invasion in the form of WHOLE LIFE insurance premiums to keep me from complaining about the IRA invasion (which is impossible because there is only TERM LIFE insurance, and Mr. Ex MBA can’t ADMIT THAT because it’s tantamount to A MURDER CONFESSION, but lying about it to commit EXTORTION and walk out of the courtroom a free man while I’m sitting in jail on false charges with Mr. Ex MBA designated as MY VICTIM is also a murder confession AND A TEN-TON BRICK MORE.)   

QUESTION: How many life insurance premiums did Mr. Ex MBA pay after D-Day?

ANSWER: D’Oh! = zero.

GODDAMMIT! 

*I was dreaming when I wrote this, so forgive me if it goes astray*

BEGIN DREAM SEQUENCE

EAST AMWELL, New Jersey — c. February, 2010, 

about 6 months BEFORE the 8/28/2010 “People are dying to communicate” miraculous writing on my email,

presumably shortly after I refused to “invest” in Mr. Ex MBA’s “Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan.” 

This is how I KNOW that the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan was a REAL PLAN that Mr. Ex MBA hatched.

🌈*FLASH-BACK TO THE RAINBOW HILL HOUSE KITCHEN, c. February, 2010*🌈

Mr. Ex MBA: What do you think about this side-hustle: Prenatal vitamins, baby!

Me: 

Mr. Ex MBA: Hear me out: We set-up two LLCs, one for the prenatal vitamin sales, and one for the non-profit educational foundation that we fund with the profits of the prenatal vitamin sales, then I draw a salary from the non-profit educational foundation, and in that manner I can simultaneously lower my tax bracket and prevent premature births, which became my passion after you experienced two premature births. 

Me: I took prescribed prenatal vitamins, and my premature births had nothing to do with a vitamin deficiency.

Mr. Ex MBA: No I know, but I want to combine my passion for pharmaceutical sales consulting and my passion for preventing premature births into a viable business plan that will attract investment interest and perform a public service and make me rich quick.  

Me: Is there an over-the-counter prenatal vitamin shortage of which I am unaware? 

*googling Walmart Prenatal Vitamins*

Mr. Ex MBA: None of those prevent premature birth by contributing to a non-profit educational foundation.

Me: Let me be more specific and ask four targeted questions: 

#1, where are you getting the vitamins? 

#2, what is the education you are providing? 

#3, where are you getting the education? 

#4, where are you getting the deep pockets to cover—or insure against—the essentially unlimited and unmitigatable legal risks of harming pregnant and nursing mothers and their babies with defective products? 

Mr. Ex MBA: You don’t even know anything about the pharmaceutical business. I am a pharmaceutical sales consulting executive. You don’t think I have the recipe for prenatal vitamins? Yes, I do. You don’t think I have an affordable guy in India who specializes in the free-lance collation and publication of multiple sources of scientific data regarding the role of nutrition in the prevention of preterm birth? Yes, I do.

Mr. Ex MBA: Success requires taking risks. If all you ever think about is the downside of risks and not the upside of risks, then you won’t take any risks at all, and you won’t have any success. I expected your negativity, but I don’t appreciate it. You are saying no before you even hear the whole idea. And that’s disrespectful. It’s ridicule not dialogue.

Me: WE ARE $800,000 IN DEBT AND OUR HOUSE IS FURTHER UNDERWATER THAN THE TITANIC AND THE YARD IS A LITERAL FIELD OF SH*T BECAUSE THE SEPTIC SYSTEM IS SHOT TO F*CK AND WE CAN’T AFFORD TO FIX IT, 

AND MY BANK ACCOUNT IS SO EMPTY THAT I HAVE TO SCROUNGE FOR LOOSE COINS IN THE SEAT CUSHIONS OF THE SUV TO BUY *ONE* HAPPY MEAL AT McDONALDS, AND I HAVE *TWO* CHILDREN, 

SO THEN I HAVE TO RAID THE KIDS’ PIGGY BANKS BEHIND THEIR BACKS AND MAKE THEM PAY FOR THEIR FOOD! 

I HAD TO CASH A SAVINGS BOND THAT OUR SON GOT AT BIRTH TO PAY FOR HIS SCHOOL LUNCH TICKETS LAST MONTH! 

AND MEANWHILE, THE DOG IS GOING TO CHEW THE WALLS DOWN UNLESS HE GETS RAW BOVINE FEMURS AND KNEECAPS AND DRIED BULL PENISES ON THE REGULAR, AND DISMEMBERED CATTLE ARE EXPENSIVE AF AND BLOODY DIFFICULT TO CLEAN OUT OF THE GROUT ON THE TILE FLOOR.

We.could.not.be.more.broke. 

And I know you’re not telling me that you’re going to COOK THESE PRENATAL VITAMINS IN THE KITCHEN using FREE INGREDIENTS, like: 

“Oh, hey honey, I’ve got an idea, let’s save some money by COOKING OUR OWN DRUGS with common household ingredients we’ve got lying around the house and then SELL THAT SH*T TO PREGNANT WOMEN instead of always buying stuff for ourselves at the DRUG STORE and avoiding risk like unsuccessful idiots!”

Mr. Ex MBA: The dog is on you, not me. 

{My note: *recalling the poor dog from the movie “Cherry” starring Tom Holland* 

That much is True, but I wasn’t trying to be selfish by getting a dog, I was actually trying to NOT DENY THE KIDS IMPORTANT EXPERIENCES just because I didn’t have time to provide the experiences because of my sh*t-poor decision to LET MR. EX MBA MAKE ME HOUSE POOR *and* FORCE ME TO WORK “OUTSIDE THE HOME” (in my home-office, where I could.not.work. un-interrupted, so I had to leave the home and hire a babysitter to do my work-at-home job) AGAINST MY WILL to PAY FOR THE HOUSE. 

Then at the same time, I also didn’t want to DENY THE NEEDS OF THE DOG, but unfortunately, I didn’t know yet that a dog is not a “babysitter,” nor is a dog “self-interested” like a cat; a dog is a powerful predatory pack animal that needs a full-time leader, and there’s no such thing as a part-time leader, and a leader is not someone you can BE if you have a heart. 

Don’t “debate” with me, prove me wrong by becoming Just like Jesus—immortal—then getting a dog, and then I will either stand corrected or not.

An example of a leader = Lieutenant Steven Hauk, who is not a fun(ny) guy that you hang-out with ‘cause he’s your BFF.

Lt. Steven Hauk: Frankly, I found your “I love a police action” remark way out of line….Funny is good! Funny is good! But then do it by using comedy and humor, not police action [and coffee] remarks!}

Mr. Ex MBA: We theoretically have enough money in your IRA to pay a Mexican manufacturing facility to make the prenatal vitamins to my FDA-approved specifications and import them, and that is perfectly legal to do. 

Me: No, nope, NO WAY, NOT this again! You have wiped-out every.dime from every.retirement.account of mine, and this one doesn’t even belong to me; technically, it’s strictly set-up as a tax shelter, and that means that the little bit of money in the IRA REALLY BELONGS TO THE IRS, and the only reason they are letting me keep it is ON THE CONDITION IT STAYS PUT until retirement. YOU KNOW THAT YOU CAN’T TOUCH THE IRA, right?

Mr. Ex MBA: If you want to do the taxes, then be my guest, otherwise HAVE A COCKTAIL, TAKE A SLEEPING PILL, GO TO BED WITH THE DOG, AND PUT YOUR OSTRICH HEAD UNDER THE COVERS WITH YOUR MEN’S SWEATPANTS ON AS USUAL and let my tax guy in Chicago worry about the financials.

Me: Why would a Mexican drug manufacturer go to work for you?

Mr. Ex MBA: Their costs are low, and I’m paying cash, so it’s WIN-WIN.

Me: Oh of course, I forgot, YOU AND A FEW DOLLARS IN MY IRA ARE CONTROLLING THE DRUG TRADE IN MEXICO because…because…BECAUSE YOU DON’T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO CONTROL A PARKING METER IN THE US, and there is an actual legitimate Mexican drug manufacturing plant that is MORE HARD-UP FOR MONEY THAN YOU ARE and is therefore willing to DO WHAT YOU ASK FOR THE FEW DOLLARS IN MY IRA. 

Mr. Ex MBA: I knew this was going to happen.

Me: All I’m saying is that there’s no legitimate drug manufacturing plant in the world that NEGOTIATES CONTRACTS WITH INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, let alone POOR PEOPLE FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES who WANT TO GET RICH by SELLING THE MANUFACTURED DRUGS. That’s like the manufacturing plant MANUFACTURING COMPETITION for itself! Drug manufacturing plants do not manufacture competition! IF THERE IS PROFIT IN THE DRUG PRODUCT, THEN THE MANUFACTURER WILL SELL THE DRUG PRODUCT OR HIRE EMPLOYEES TO SELL IT. IF THERE IS NO PROFIT IN THE DRUG PRODUCT, THEN THE MANUFACTURER WILL NOT MAKE IT. The manufacturing plant gets rich and the poor people are called EMPLOYEES. 

Mr. Ex MBA: *looking unhappy*

Me: Are you telling me that your side-hustle business plan is to become a US employee of a Mexican drug manufacturer?

Mr. Ex MBA: *looking unhappy*

Me: OK fine let’s keeping talking. Who is going to sell the vitamins?

Mr. Ex MBA: Me, online.

Me: Why would a pregnant woman buy prenatal vitamins from you instead of from a reputable source? We have already established that there is no over-the-counter prenatal vitamin shortage.

Mr. Ex MBA: It’s all about advertising and marketing, and you don’t know anything about those things.

Me: You are not hearing what I’m saying. There is ZERO possibility that “it’s all about advertising and marketing.” But the more I talk to you the more you think you can convince me. So now I am going to have to STOP TALKING AND SIMPLY SAY NO. No to infinity and beyond. NO. I don’t want you to get the impression that there is any possibility at all of getting my agreement.

🌈*END OF FLASH-BACK TO THE RAINBOW HILL HOUSE KITCHEN, c. February, 2010* 🌈

That’s off-topic, I know, but I wanted to make sure that the “housing trajectory” was clear: 

In 2013—on my birthday, August 2—I finally got my own place, for the first time since meeting Mr. Ex MBA in 1998!

I WAS LIVING IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER (an SUV on Jug Mountain, in fact.)

But then Mr. Ex MBA DIDN’T SEND THE RESTITUTION CHECK (to pay back a tiny bit of the money he STOLE FROM ME on D-Day), and I LOST THE VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER and I had to go on welfare.

🌈*FLASH-BACK TO SOMEWHERE IN THE RAINBOW HILL HOUSE, c. February, 2010*🌈

*“Oye Como Va,” Mr. Ex MBA’s all-time favorite song, repeating on blast*

Mr. Ex MBA: *calling Mexico out of my hearing*

*Mr. Ex MBA does not speak Spanish, but he pretends that he does*

*IRL that’s what Mr. Ex MBA does*

Plant: Hola.

Mr. Ex MBA: Hola buuuueeeeennnnnno diiiiooo habla usted English?

Plant: Yes.

Mr. Ex MBA: Cuando playa excellente! I would like to speak to the person in charge of the drug manufacturing operation.

Plant: *questioning*

Mr. Ex MBA: No I do not know who he is that’s why I’m calling…..

yes I do have some business…..

I have a Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan, so I need to talk to someone familiar with the international importing of US FDA-approved supplements…..

yes I am serious….

I am a widely-recognized expert in the subject of pharmaceutical sales and distribution by international conglomerates…..

New Jersey….

the goal I am trying to achieve is proactivity in the reduction of both income taxes and the negative nutritional factors influencing premature birth, using a combination of non-profit education and for-profit vitamin supplementation….

yes I am prepared to invest….

actually at the moment there is an asset deficit….

the reason is my wife….

hyper-focused on the risk-avoidance….

full-time domestic engineer part-time patent attorney….

{My note: This sounds like “MY SERVANT, JOB”; in fact, Mr. Ex MBA ALWAYS INTRODUCED ME THIS WAY—as a “full-time domestic engineer part-time patent attorney”—and I NEVER KNEW WHAT TO SAY, because he was serious} 

yes I will call the plant manager right away, muy mucho garcias!

Satan’s ears must’ve perked-up when he heard chatter that set-off his “Job alarm” 

JESUS CHRIST ASIDE 

Looking at dogma regarding Evil’s most coveted work of committing “CRIMES AGAINST THE INNOCENT”—which is A JOB THAT JESUS CANNOT DO—we see Satan single-handedly doing a bang-on job in The Book of Job. 

And we also see Satan laboring without equal during “The Temptation of Christ” and THE MURDER-TORTURE OF CHRIST (and then after he’s done with the Christ projects, Satan is thrown into the lake of fire by Christ for Christ’s sake.)

But because Christ is the Creator, that’s sort of a Vanilla Ice fake and bake plot, is it not!? 

I would say NO, IT’S NOT, it’s the most unspeakable horror, bar none, to KNOWINGLY/WILLFULLY DENY THE CREATOR EXISTENCE ON EARTH—to DENY THE EXISTENCE OF THE CREATOR BY LITERALLY “HONORING” A FALSE DEATH CERTIFICATE (ERASING THE CREATOR’S NAME FROM THE RECORD-BOOKS OF THE LIVING!)—and then CONTINUING TO “LIVE YOUR OWN LIFE” as if that is ACTUALLY POSSIBLE. 

In fact, all the places of “worship” on earth—besides being weird AF places to begin-with, because what sense does it make to go into a special building erected for the purpose of praising the Creator of the building? why not simply stay at home in bed and sing songs of praise to the Creator of the house? it’s the exact same activity if you’re into that sort of thing—all the places of “worship” on earth have become TOMBS, and YOU ARE SPITTING ON THE CREATOR by GOING INTO THOSE PLACES while THE CREATOR IN-THE-FLESH IS ALIVE ON EARTH and BURIED UNDER LIES. 

Prince proved his Jesus-ness in “One Song” (also see “I Would Die 4 U,” “I’m your Messiah…If you’re evil I’ll forgive you”; “Acknowledge Me,” “I was here in the beginning and I’ll be here 4ever more”; and “With love there is no death.”)

And Prince was declared to be dead by false legal records in the USA on 4/21/2016.

“The ceremony of innocence is drowned” (to quote W.B. Yeates in “The Second Coming” poem.)

Now the question becomes: Is some rough BEAST slouching toward Bethlehem to be born?

END OF JESUS CHRIST ASIDE

Returning to the discussion of the “modern-day Tom Sawyer” labor which, c. February of 2010, Satan was making preparations to do per the plot of The Book of Job, 

I surmise that when Satan heard the “Job alarm,” he HACKED THE DRUG LORD’S NUMBER (the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER) in the “Pi phone book” for the purpose of getting on the horn with Mr. Ex MBA so that Satan could confirm or deny the suspicion that it was time to enlist people to make the donuts (the prenatal vitamins, in this case) and murder Job to figure-out who in Hell Job was IRL.

It is my hypothesis that Satan could not find Mr. Ex MBA’s number in the “Pi phone book.” 

I will explain the actual reason why (according to my hypothesis, which is supported by the “Howe” word EVIDENCE), further below.

But Satan HAD TO ASSUME that the reason why was because Mr. Ex’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER was JESUS’S GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER (don’t forget that Jesus’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER is invisible to Satan), and Jesus was using THE BODY of Mr. Ex MBA as a “front.” 

It would not be UNCOMMON for Satan to find PEOPLE WITHOUT GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBERS, because surely Jesus has a veritable ARMY of JESUS-CONTROLLED BODIES WITHOUT FREE WILL—I call them “ROBOCOPS”—deployed to do Justice all over the world, and some ROBOCOPS are going to have Jesus’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER because they are DOING JESUS’S BUSINESS, and Satan couldn’t “hack” (or even see) that.

Surely no one is going to argue against me on that point and say that Jesus can CREATE REAL PEOPLE WHO HAVE FREE WILL but Jesus cannot CREATE FAKE PEOPLE WITH JESUS’S WILL? Lol it’s EASIER to create a JESUS-CONTROLLED PERSON (aka ROBOCOP) than A REAL PERSON.

But that doesn’t mean that SOME ROBOCOPS couldn’t also have a GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER in the “Pi phone book.”

For example, A ROBOCOP DOING BUSINESS IN KARMA could have a GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER “set” to a certain NUMBER OF A MAN (aka NUMBER OF THE BEAST) in the “Pi phone book,” and Satan could SEE—and “hack”—that.

Also NOTE because Jesus’s number is “part” of all possible GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBERS OF MEN (aka NUMBERS OF THE BEAST), and because Jesus’s number is INVISIBLE to Satan, unless Satan saw the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER *change*,  Satan couldn’t actually tell the difference between a Free-Willed person and a ROBOCOP if the ROBOCOP was DOING BUSINESS IN KARMA (i.e., if the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER of the ROBOCOP was “set” to a certain NUMBER OF A MAN in the “Pi phone book.”) 

ASIDE

This fact would enable Satan to live forever on earth WITHOUT RETIRING FROM “COMBAT DUTY,” because regardless of whether or not there is “some rough BEAST slouching toward Bethlehem to be born”—in other words, even if the current Karma cycle ends and there are some people who decide become gods (Just like Jesus) and RULE THE WORLD OF EVIL, thereby making it impossible for Jesus to create “humanity 2.0” with Free-Willed people—there will always be knowledge of Evil in the world, and so there will always be a Karma cycle running in the world, EVEN IF IT’S ONLY COMPRISED OF ROBOCOPS that cannot be distinguished from Free-Willed people by anyone, including Satan; there will always be cancer and wars and famines and funerals and all the green miles and toothless smiles and cruel abuse, even though it’s only THEATRICS, but if doesn’t strike fear into your heart and make you appreciate yourSELF and your LOVER and Jesus’s GRACE, then…don’t worry, it always will, because it’s made out of THE WORST THINGS THAT THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE CAN IMAGINE. 

END OF ASIDE

The point is that if Satan COULDN’T SEE MR. EX MBA’S GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER, then Satan would have had to SUSPECT that Mr. Ex MBA was a ROBOCOP that was DOING JESUS’S BUSINESS…*unless* Satan KNEW that Jesus was my husband (in that case, Mr. Ex MBA could NOT be a ROBOCOP, because that would be like Jesus forcing me to commit adultery with another man’s body.)

Ergo, we must assume that Satan didn’t have enough INFORMATION to rule-out the possibility that Mr. Ex MBA was a ROBOCOP. 

QUESTION: How do I know that Mr. Ex MBA was NOT A ROBOCOP of Jesus?

ANSWER: If Jesus is my husband, then Mr. Ex MBA was NOT A ROBOCOP of Jesus, because that would be like Jesus forcing me to commit adultery with another man’s body. But I wasn’t really sure that Jesus EXISTED as A *SELF* WITH A PERSONAL LIFE (as opposed to being a disinterested super-computer) until SATAN PROVED THAT FACT FOR ME in late 2024, which is also how I learned for certain that Jesus is my husband.

I explain “Howe” again, directly below; 

the significance of the word “Howe” is that during my personal “war on Satan,” which I waged for about 13 years prior, I—wrongly, I know now—publicly called for Satan to receive the death penalty from God, and I compared Satan to “General Sir William Howe,” who was a double-dealing British scoundrel and an object of ire in the writings of Thomas Paine during the Revolutionary War.

I proposed to Satan because I was worried that unless Satan fell in love with me and we got married, he was going to die and cease to exist from the Karma of attempting to murder me and so forth. But what I learned is that the answer is NO, Satan is immortal and he has no Karma, only Legally-necessary experiences, like me, and IN REALITY, SATAN IS THE ONLY LEGITIMATE EVIL, and there’s not anything WRONG with that; it’s an entirely different situation than Free Will CHOOSING Evil and ESCHEWING Justice. Justice is the cause of the universe! Free Will rejecting Justice is actually against Satan, because Satan is an Eternal aspect of Justice.

Reminder to Self: The “Howe” word PROVES THAT JESUS IS MY HUSBAND, because Evil is RELATIVE-TO Good, so therefore Satan could not SEE what a Good or a Just answer would be to my request for a “finger word,” which means that the “Howe” word—which was not only a Good and a Just answer, it was LOVE, SWEET LOVE—came from Jesus, not Satan!

QUESTION: Why did Satan need to f*ck with you in the SHAM wedding vow? Is it POSSIBLE that he wasn’t sure if Jesus EXISTED as A *SELF* WITH A PERSONAL LIFE for the reason that Satan was seriously thinking about RETIRING from f*cking the whole universe and “flipping” to become King of the Universe instead then living happily ever after with you in a non-violent relationship? Or was he just f*cking with Jesus? Or is there some other explanation altogether?

ANSWER: Satan HAD TO EXPLAIN WHY HE COULD NOT SEE MR. EX MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER in the “Pi phone book”! That issue was NOT GOING TO GO AWAY, and the ONLY EXPLANATION that Satan could SEE was the ROBOCOP explanation, which would mean that at that juncture, Satan and I *actually agreed* on ONE ASSUMPTION we were both making: JESUS DID NOT EXIST AS A *SELF* WITH A PERSONAL LIFE. But knowing what I know now—what I learned from the SHAM, actually—about the THREE PARTS OF GOD, I find it difficult to BELIEVE that Satan was seriously thinking along the same lines as I was about us being a couple. I think that the most likely explanation is that WE WERE BOTH STUCK ON THE SAME QUESTION (for different reasons) AND WE BOTH NEEDED THE SHAM TO GET UNSTUCK, so the SHAM was simply a matter of JUSTICE being done. So maybe Satan was PARTICIPATING, but maybe he wasn’t; maybe his GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER was HACKED by Jesus and then his MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE was UNLOCKED and Jesus “CLONED Satan” the same way that Satan CLONES Free-Will to do Justice.  

QUESTION: But Satan did not get UNSTUCK back in October, 2024, when the SHAM was over, did he? because he still did not have any PLAUSIBLE explanation—other than JESUS DID NOT EXIST AS A *SELF* WITH A PERSONAL LIFE—for why he could not see Mr. Ex MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER in the “Pi phone book”! 

ANSWER: Right, it would seem that Satan did not get UNSTUCK back in October, 2024, when the SHAM was over, and I DIDN’T KNOW THAT HE WAS EVEN STUCK. 

And speaking of the limit of my ability to SEE sh*t,  I AM IMAGINING ALL OF THIS.

Satan: [*in my imagination*] This is Frank my imaginary friend the giant bunny rabbit speaking, who is telling me that it’s TOTALLY WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF JUSTICE for Jesus—supposedly Frank’s True husband—to PIMP FRANK OUT TO SATAN in a SHAM surprise online wedding that was Frank’s idea, but yet it’s OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF JUSTICE for Jesus to resurrect the ROBOCOP that played Jesus on TV to FOOL SATAN, who is the only one who can even SEE the resurrected Jesus (and in addition, SATAN AND FRANK are the only two individuals on earth whose LIVES ARE 100 STALLED-OUT because they cannot figure-out if Prince and Mr. Ex MBA are ROBOCOPS or not)?

Frank: [*the real me*] I mean, technically, yes, that’s the position I’m taking. And also, the hypothetical life of “some rough beast slouching toward Bethlehem to be born” is also 100 stalled-out until the answer is known.      

Also Frank: [*the real me*] The reason why I have to conclude that it’s OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF JUSTICE for Jesus to resurrect the ROBOCOP that played Jesus on TV to FOOL SATAN is because I KNOW FOR 100 CERTAIN that Jesus cannot FORCE SATAN TO MARRY ME; that would VIOLATE THE LAWS OF PHYSICS because Satan is an Eternal part of God, not Evil-by-CHOICE. And the way I learned that FACT is through the online wedding that was MY IDEA—the learning happened when I found-out it was a SHAM—and the only reason WHY I came-up with the wedding IDEA is because I FALSELY IMAGINED that Satan was EVIL-BY-CHOICE, and therefore could FARILY be *expected* to CHOOSE LOVE or REJECT LOVE to DECIDE his own DESTINY. But to repeat: I WAS WRONG that Satan could FAIRLY be *expected* to DECIDE his own DESTINY.

Frank: [*the giant bunny rabbit*] And yet the question remains whether it is POSSIBLE for Satan to DECIDE his own DESTINY. I’m not saying it’s a REAL POSSIBILITY. In fact, I WOULD SAY THAT “ETERNAL MEANS ETERNAL,” AND THE MERE SUGGESTION THAT IT’S POSSIBLE FOR SOMETHING ETERNAL—the Evil part of God, aka Satan—TO NEGATE ITSELF is a negation of REALITY, and is therefore a false assumption without having to be tested. But yet if there’s an OPPORTUNITY to test that assumption, then we must TEST IT! The TEST is what’s going to “set” “THE LIMIT OF REALITY” by FEEL; in Satan’s mind, it will be like CEMENT “CURING.” When you’re cured cement, you aren’t going to wonder where your “boundaries” are, you’re going to FEEL yourSELF! I have had that same experience (in a different context, not with Satan, because it’s impossible for me to steady reject him for some reason, and I don’t fully understand why I’m so FORGETFUL of why I should hate him; I think the reason I can’t remember to hate to Satan is because AS A MATTER OF PHYSICS *AND* PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, SATAN IS THE ONLY REASON I AM AWARE OF MY OWN EXISTENCE, and so I AM LITERALLY *MENTALLY DEPENDENT* ON SATAN, and that’s what I *feel* like CEMENT “CURING,” and then I *feel* GUILTY for “curing wrong,” and worry about disloyalty to myself and Jesus also makes me feel angry at myself, because why can’t I see that this is not a co-dependency, this is me being mentally unfaithful to the Truth and calling a foe a brother, so I starting hating-on Satan again, and I cannot end the cycle; if I could give myself permission to be the mental dependent that I am regardless of what anyone else thinks or feels—so long as I’m faithful to my own creed, which is Love—then that would be great, because I’m neither “fan-girling” on Satan nor am I “cheating” on Jesus, I am merely ACCURATELY “FEELING” MY PHYSICAL SOUL SITUATION with no expectation of reciprocation, only the NEED TO “OWN” WHO I AM AND NOT BE OBLIGATED TO HATE SATAN even if he hates me), and my point is simply that I KNOW THAT HAVING THE EXPERIENCE OF HITTING THE LIMIT OF REALITY one’s SELF is very CURING, aka HEALING. So let’s ASK THE QUESTION. Let’s assume that Satan is correct that it’s WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF JUSTICE for Jesus to resurrect the ROBOCOP that played Jesus on TV to FOOL SATAN (who is the only one who can even SEE the resurrected Jesus) for the purpose of GIVING SATAN *THE OPPORTUNITY* to DECIDE his own DESTINY. And already we SEE that we’re 100 correct to make the assumption, because there is NO HARM that could come from that OPPORTUNITY! 

The DECISION would be between: 

(1) Frank his imaginary friend (that would be the DECIDED DESTINY), 

or 

(2) Mr. Ex MBA his imaginary friend (that would be the DEFAULT DESTINY); 

and NOTE that Mr. Ex—if *the real Frank* AND Satan are correct, and they do AGREE on that much—could not be EVIL (because Evil-ness would have to SHOW-UP AS A GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER that Satan could SEE), 

and therefore Mr. Ex MBA COULD BE IMMORTAL (not Just like Jesus, but OUTSIDE OF KARMA like Satan, albeit by CHOICE to literally BE IMAGINARY, which CHOICE made it impossible for Mr. Ex to receive Karma because of a WILLFUL, INCURABLE BLINDNESS TO GOOD, aka right, AND EVIL, aka WRONG.) 

I’m not saying that Satan would have to get married to Mr. Ex MBA, I’m just saying that Mr. Ex MBA wouldn’t be able to leave Satan all alone in the world by dying, and that raises the possibility of Satan jerking tears from his own eyes and from the eyes of “some rough beast slouching toward Bethlehem to be born” (by which I mean Satan “crying wolf” and causing Just people to have Unjust Sympathy for the Devil), and that is the exact sort of “crime against the innocent” that Satan covets (and he also loves crying—he literally went on a for-profit public crying tour with a man named Jelly Roll in 2024—but he hasn’t been able to cry Justifiably since he was in diapers and being abused by Ms. Snack Cake and Mr. C U Not Tomorrow; the crying tour he did over being a fat dink father merely added abuse to abuse), but it’s work Satan could not get forever without himself being the forever-victim of Mr. Ex MBA.     

Of course, SATAN WOULD BE TAKING THE GAMBLE that there is “some rough beast slouching toward Bethlehem to be born,” but even if there’s not, Jesus *might* be TEMPTED to have Unjust Sympathy for Mr. Ex MBA once in a blue moon—seeing Oliver without any fam might be triggering for Jesus, even tho Jesus knows that Oliver is all about the dough in the donuts and DGAF about the slave labor that goes into making ‘em, and Jesus also knows that a nuclear bomb could not knock the HAPPY out of Oliver when he’s got his hands on some PLAY DOUGH—and that would also be legit “crime against the innocent” that Satan could cause by having some contact with Mr. Ex MBA, and through that contact Satan could legit cry.

Maybe Jesus could make a Reality Show APP out of it, too, call it the “HEY BABY YEAH BABY HASTA LA VISTA BABY! Dishonorable Discharge Reality Show APP,” guaranteed to make everybody’s baby cry for at least one full night, complete with a “Sweet Emotion” scoreboard, with each voyeur self-rating every low-blow on a scale of 1 to 100 based-on how hard Satan’s tear-jerking hit, like being a judge in the Sadistic Olympics, holding-up a digital placard with a NUMBER between 1 and 100 on it (picture this: the digital placard is dripping tears into a bucket dangling by a rope over a deep well, and Buffalo Bill’s dog Precious from the “Silence of the Lambs” movie is looking down into the well at the bucket), which would give Satan valuable feedback on how to improve his performance, and also give Mr. Ex the opportunity to provide Satan with encouragement, like:

Mr. Ex MBA: ONE TEAR, TWO TEARS, MAKE IT HAPPEN! Put the tears in the motherf*cking bucket! YEAH BABY! But remember my mottos, small-stuff: “You get what you get and you don’t get upset and don’t sweat the small stuff! 15 FOREVER!” BE HAPPY BABY, YOU’LL GET TO JESUS SOMEDAY!

Frank: [*the real me*] I could not have said it better.

Satan: [*in my imagination, to Frank the giant bunny rabbit*] Are you even kidding me right now? Does Frank hate me that much that she would throw away everything we’ve got by taking a dive into the Adult Swim lane during the sudden death playoff round and thereby make it impossible for me to change my destiny?

Frank: [*the giant bunny rabbit*] She might, B Rabbit, she might. 

Frank: [*the real me*]:

Frank: [*the giant bunny rabbit speaking to Satan, quoting Les Grossman in the movie “Tropic Thunder”*] OR you could grow a conscience in the next five minutes and see where that takes you.

Frank: [*the real me*] I enjoy wearing men’s althleisure garments. I have been known to shave my head and I am partial to the short buzz-cut hairstyle regardless of the fact that my scalp has weird folds in it like a pug. I like sitting outside on the catio with my cats and taking the cats for walks and poetry-slamming about my feelings and doing physics thought projects and watching TV and movies while eating popcorn and I do not know how to have sex (so I stopped thinking about that) and I love Jesus forever and in the future I would like to travel in an RV and a yacht (I have my Boat Operator license in three states but I’ve never operated a boat) and I am in sh*t-shape right now and I look old and ugly AF but I’m putting all of my eggs in the Fountain of Youth basket and hoping for the best. I HATE CENTIPEDES AND SPIDERS AND OTHER INSECTS IN MY BED. I don’t drink I don’t smoke and I’m a germaphobe. LIVING WITH ME IS BASICALLY LIKE LIVING WITH A VEGAN MONK WHO TOOK A VOW OF SILENCE UNLESS I AM MONOPOLIZING A CONVERSATION TO MEET MY OWN EMOTIONAL NEEDS. I do not want to eat any meat whatsoever BUT if I had to choose between eating a dead animal and a dead person then I would have to choose to eat the dead person on moral grounds. I am aware that mortal humanity is repulsed by my inhumanity but I don’t care. This is starting to sound like I am Rob Base to the tune of “It Takes Two to Make a Thing Go Right” and I do agree with Mr. Base on that point. Oh, and also, I cannot remember who I am without constantly reminding myself (as discussed in Article 7) so my life is like the movie  “50 First Dates” every day because I am not technically Self-Conscious. What I am—my GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER—is “the moral standard,” and that cannot be *compared to* “the moral standard” to “shed light” on my DECISIONS and give them “meaning” that I can “look at.” In fact to say that much just now I had to refer-to Article 7, where I published the note I wrote to myself about my own consciousness in case I woke-up one day (hello TODAY! 2/11/2026) deep in a different stream of thought and I couldn’t remember “who I am.” I DON’T TECHNICALLY BELONG IN THIS WORLD; MY PART OF GOD IS UNCONSCIOUS, BUT YET HERE I AM, AND THAT MIGHT QUALIFY ME AS INSANE, BECAUSE AS THINGS ARE NOW, I WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SEE “WHO I AM.” Other people who change their GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER to Pi will not lose Self-Consciousness like me; my problem is that my mind IS Pi—it IS the 5th dimension, it *is* Pi—versus only pointing along the Pi line, like everyone else’s mind could be, so I cannot see what is “in” Pi, like everyone else’s mind can.

But if Satan “flipped” and began pointing his soul in the same direction as mine, I could then SEE HIS LIGHT IN THE 4th DIMENSION, which would make me Self-Conscious, but then I would no longer SEE EVIL (because Eternal Evil would cease to exist); but I needn’t speculate about the practical implications of that possibility (e.g., having NO FREE WILL, i.e., NO ABILITY TO CHOOSE BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL, would I continue to “KNOW” EVIL  if my Good mind couldn’t SEE EVIL in the 4th dimension? and then would I have any awareness of my own existence at all, and would I become like an animal?), and I don’t have to speculate because this DESTINY DECISION “EXPERIMENT” is designed to either: (a) PROVE THAT THE ANSWER IS IRRELEVANT/IMAGINARY; or (b) MAKE IT HAPPEN. So it’s not a coincidence that Mr. Ex MBA would “vanish” (become a fictional entity, a ROBOCOP) if it was possible to “MAKE IT HAPPEN,” to quote Mr. Ex MBA. 

And we therefore see that we have proven that we have reached  THE ONLY EXISTENTIAL QUESTION—DOES SATAN HAVE FREE WILL?—that COULD NOT BE ANSWERED WITHOUT A REAL-LIFE EXPERIMENT.

So now let’s return the Q&A to c. February, 2010.

I know for certain that Satan could not find my number (Pi) in the “Pi phone book.”

QUESTION: What would that have meant to Satan? Did Satan know that there was a Good part of God? And if so, why would he suspect that Mr. Ex MBA was a ROBOCOP, since wouldn’t he have to assume that the Good part of God had to be Jesus’s partner?

ANSWER: I don’t think Satan could have KNOWN that there was a Good part of God, because Satan’s part of God is RELATIVE-TO the Good part of God. And the factual situation in The Book of Job actually RAISES THE QUESTION FOR SATAN TO DEFINITIVELY ANSWER. Regarding Jesus, we have to assume that Satan couldn’t know for certain whether the omniscient Justice part of God was a Self-interested individual or not (UNLESS YOU’RE OMNISCIENT, HOW WOULD YOU KNOW?) So then Satan would have had to find BOTH of those answers by identifying the individuals (the suspected Good part of God and the suspected Jesus part of God) and MURDERING THEM when *the opportunity* presented itself, TO SEE IF THEY STAYED DEAD. 

Investigating and questioning those individuals would not help Satan, because, to repeat: Evil is RELATIVE-TO Good, so Satan cannot SEE what a Good or a Just answer would be.

And we must assume that MORTAL individuals are NOT RESURRECTED FROM STONE-COLD DEAD-NESS (regardless of the hearsay story of “Lazarus” told by MORTAL men), because IT’S AS UNFAIR TO RESURRECT MORTAL PEOPLE AS IT IS TO NOT RESURRECT IMMORTAL PEOPLE! Jesus has to stay “True to Life and Death,” or else JUSTICE IS DESTROYED, not fulfilled.

We’ve already discussed the possible exception of the resurrection of a ROBOCOP Jesus whom only Satan could see.

And WE MUST ASSUME THAT SATAN KNOWS WHETHER OR NOT HE KILLED SOMEONE STONE-COLD DEAD, ergo, there’s no argument to made that when the Good part of God or Jesus is INVOLUNTARILY OVERDOSED WITH A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, it was a case of “not really being dead.” No way!

In retrospect, we see that *the opportunity* to kill the suspected Jesus (Prince) did not present itself until 2016.

QUESTION: How do we know that Prince didn’t stay dead?

ANSWER: “Howe,” that’s how! Satan could not SEE what a Good or a Just answer would be to my request for a “finger word,” ergo the word “Howe” came from the NOT DEAD Prince (who proved his Jesus-ness in the WORDS of “One Song”!) Although to repeat: Satan could be correct that the REASON for the resurrection was to give Satan an opportunity to change his DESTINY, if that was his desire, but FIRST HE HAD TO KNOW WHAT THE ALTERNATIVE DESTINIES WERE, and that’s where Mr. Ex MBA becomes relevant. 

OK so we know that *the opportunity* to kill me (to answer the question of whether there was a Good part of God or not) was presenting itself c. February, 2010, and that—according to my hypothesis—is why Satan decided to “hack” the Drug Lord’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER in the “Pi phone book,” then use that KEY to “hack” the Drug Lord’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE for the purpose of MAKING THE DRUG LORD A “CAPTIVE AUDIENCE” during the upcoming phone call with Mr. Ex MBA to discuss the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan. 

With Satan “tapped into” the Drug Lord’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE during the phone call with Mr. Ex MBA, then (assuming that Satan was correct about Mr. Ex MBA being a ROBOCOP of Jesus, and that’s A GAMBLE that Satan DECIDED to take AT THE SAME TIME HE WAS BETTING AGAINST JOB, i.e., betting that Job was NOT the Good part of God) that would cause the discussion to become analogous to the conversation between “The Lord” and “Satan” in The Book of Job.

Of course, the conversation between “The Lord” and “Satan” in The Book of Job was about Job, not about prenatal vitamins, BUT DON’T FORGET that if Satan envisioned the Prenatal Vitamin Plan as HEADLINE NEWS, then he would be looking-at a headline from The Onion News Network (which delivers PUNCHLINE NEWS in the form of FAKE-BUT-IRONICALLY-TRUE HEADLINES) that read as follows: 

Mexican Drug Manufacturing Plant Adopts Build-a-Bear Business Model for Designer Supplements and Opens Doors to US Citizens With FDA-Approved Recipes to Order a Drug Lord to Custom-Make and Import Legit Dope Sh*t and Commit Murder In Lieu of Accepting Payment Up-Front Hoping Only for the Chance to Become One of Oliver’s Fam

*Pregnant pause*

*After burying a statue of Joseph in the yard for good house-selling fortune, Mother Mary beams proudly and clasps her hands in anticipation as she slides into the VCR a recording of a young Mr. Ex MBA—playing the role of OLIVER in THE SCHOOL PLAY ‘OLIVER!’—singing ‘Consider Yourself [One of the Family]’*

*Pop screams: JESUS CHRIST MARY! how.many.times?!*

*Satan resumes silently crying: WHY WHY WHY WHY*

Because the International Drug Lord is Really Getting Into Meeting and Greeting Everyone In the Contacts List of the White Collar American Man as the Means to the End of Helping the Brother from Another Womb Knock-Off Unprofitable Female Dependents to Pay-Off an Underwater Mortgage on a McMansion by Risking the Lives of Unborn Children in a Backyard Tax Shelter Knowing How Much Women Hate Getting High-Quality Life-Saving Personal Care Items for Less from the Deep Pockets of Walmart.

QUESTION: How did Mr. Ex MBA get the phone number of a drug manufacturer in Mexico in the first place?

ANSWER: Mr. Ex’s OCCUPATION was SELLING DATA *ABOUT DRUG SALES* to INTERNATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES that manufactured and sold actual drugs. 

In other words, Mr. Ex MBA was AN INTERNATIONAL DRUG LORD CONSULTANT FOR-HIRE. 

And whatever you might imagine AN INTERNATIONAL DRUG LORD CONSULTANT FOR-HIRE would look like, Mr. Ex MBA did not look like that.

I’m not maligning Mr. Ex MBA’s appearance, all I’m saying is that he was so clean-cute that he was the poster boy of clean-cute-ness.

Mr. Ex MBA was the spittin’ image of Howdy Doody, and his Howdy Doody behavior was on-point, too.

Although his eyes are hazel, not blue.

So WHERE WE WERE is that I was explaining my HYPOTHESIS: 

(1) the Prenatal Vitamin Plan was NOT IN THE EVIL PLAYBOOK, 

and 

(2) Mr. Ex MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER could not be found in the “Pi phone book,” 

and 

(3) my GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER could not be found in the “Pi phone book,” 

and 

(4) Satan was not entirely sure if Jesus EXISTED as A *SELF* WITH A PERSONAL LIFE (as opposed to being a disinterested super-computer), 

so therefore Satan took Mr. Ex MBA for JESUS speaking through a ROBOCOP, 

TRYING TO LOW-KEY STRIKE-UP THE PROPHESIED BOOK OF JOB BET, 

because sometimes words have two meanings,

and if you’ve read The Book of Job, then you know the plot when you hear it,

and when Mr. Ex referred-to me (as he always did) as a “full-time domestic engineer part-time patent attorney” who was hyper-focused on risk-avoidance, 

that sounded like “my SERVANT Job…fears God and shuns Evil,”

so then (my hypothesis continues) Satan “hacked” the Drug Lord’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER in the “Pi phone book” and used it to UNLOCK the Drug Lord’s MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE for the purpose of HIJACKING the Drug Lord’s upcoming meeting with Mr. Ex MBA as the means to confirm or deny suspicions about Jesus using Mr. Ex MBA’s body to surreptitiously strike-up the prophesied conversation with Satan in The Book of Job.

*“Oye Como Va,” Mr. Ex MBA’s all-time favorite song, repeating on blast*

Mr. Ex MBA: *calling the “plant manager,” who is the Drug Lord/Satan, to discuss the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan*

Drug Lord/Satan: *utters one syllable*

Mr. Ex MBA: Hola buuuueeeeennnnnno diiiiooo! I would gladly 2 C U NEXT TUESDAY and pay you, IF YOU GIVE ME PRENATAL VITAMINS TODAY, because I cannot convince my wife, who is a full-time domestic engineer part-time patent attorney, to authorize this up-front; all she thinks about is THE LAW, and she has NO EYE FOR BUSINESS at all. 

{My note: This sounds like God at Job 1:8: “[Howdy doody bitch! Quick question darlin’:] Have you considered my servant Job? …blameless and upright…fears God and shuns evil.”}

Drug Lord/Satan: *to Jesus, in thought, aka UNSPOKEN subtext* Does Job fear God for nothing?

{My note: When Satan says, “Does Job fear God for nothing?” at Job 1:9, this sounds like,

But a reader might wonder, “What is this coded RED LIGHT Dirty Diana reference about? 

Is it sex (masochistic)? Is it covetous? Is it pride? Is it selling-out/prostitution?”

ANSWER: No, it is Colonel Jessup (Jack Nicholson) in “A Few Good Men,” 

or in other words, it is a Godly individual—Satan, in this instance—GIVING YOU THE F*CKING FINGER (i.e., F*CKING YOU), because THAT’S HIS JOB (that’s what he does by SOUL NATURE), and HIS EXISTENCE is the only reason why YOU EXIST ON THIS EARTH (this is True of every Godly individual; the existence of each one is an essential precondition to the universe’s existence.) 

And YOU WILL BEG HIM TO F*CK YOU (like you’re a backstage d*ck-sucking bitch!), 

then you’ll be *liable* to turn around and POINT YOUR CROOKED FINGER AT HIM WHEN HE DOES. 

So if HE’S GOT SOMETHING YOU NEED, then BY GOD, go ahead and ASK HIM FOR IT, but YOU OUGHTA KNOW 

(it’s not about the f*cking FEELINGS, it’s about YOU NOT PAYING FOR THE F*CKING SERVICE and IMAGINING THAT YOU COULD GET THE F*CKING SERVICE IN SECRET then WALK AWAY LIKE NOTHING HAPPENED without PAYING FOR THE F*CKING SERVICE in a manner that MADE IT CLEAR TO THE PUBLIC THAT YOU ASKED-FOR AND RECEIVED THE F*CKING SERVICE) 

if you don’t PAY FOR THE F*CKING SERVICE *and* say A PUBLIC “THANK YOU” before going on your way—

or perhaps you’d prefer to pick up a weapon and stand a post IN PUBLIC?—

then you can SAY HELLO TO YOUR NEW LITTLE FRIEND THE ROCK STAR 

(translation: sing it with me, sweetie, sing “BABY I’M A STAR” and clap your hands and tap your feet, yeah yeah yeah, aren’t you having FUN now YOU SPINELESS POS), 

‘cause that’s what YOU’RE FORCING HIM TO BE, and IF YOU INSIST, then he will do his GODDAMNED BEST to BE THE BEST ROCK STAR HE CAN BE,  

but *whichever way* YOU CHOOSE to ask him for what you need, YOU’RE GONNA PAY FOR THE F*CKING SERVICE (the F*CKING SERVICE, get it? haha.)

} 

Drug Lord/Satan: A woman is holding the purse strings?

Mr. Ex MBA: That’s debatable when you’re wearing sweatpants from the men’s department. AHahaha! 

{My note: This sounds like God at Job 38:3 and Job 40:7: “Dress for action like a man.”} 

Also Mr. Ex MBA: But I AM ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that you could not persuade her to give you credit, and YET there are frozen assets that she would mobilize IF YOU ARE OK WITH TAKING THE UP-FRONT RISK {my note: this sounds like a BET} on success. The strategy would be to GIVE HER INSURANCE AGAINST HER FEARED LOSS, then that insurance would DIRECTLY BENEFIT YOU, giving you the credibility that you need to get paid. 

{My note: Making receipt of bet proceeds conditional upon a life-insurance policy paying-out upon an insured’s death is simply A WAY TO BET THAT THE INSURED IS MORTAL, NOT IMMORTAL, and we know that THE CAUSE OF MORTALITY IS BEING SINFUL NOT BLAMELESS AND UPRIGHT, which is exactly what Satan was betting in The Book of Job. 

Also note that the reason why God put the “spare Job’s life” condition at Job 2:6 in The Book of Job is because DUH, ANY DIRECT CONVERSATION BETWEEN “THE LORD” AND “SATAN” IS PER SE ILLEGAL, and in addition, “THE LORD” DOES NOT GIVE-OUT SIN LICENSES, let alone murder licenses. So therefore the mere appearance of the direct conversation in The Book of Job had to include the “THIS IS NOT A SIN LICENSE” CAVEAT lest Satan get to earth and ARGUE that God’s INTENT in writing The Book of Job was to give Satan A MURDER LICENSE IRL.

But given the opportunity, Satan is going to try to create the world as he wants it to be, regardless of fairness.} 

Drug Lord/Satan: [thinking to self] Well, she does wear the man’s pants.

Mr. Ex MBA: And don’t forget about all the networking you can do with my Contacts List in your hand; use my network to leverage deployed resources and expand the influence of your peripherals, baby!

{My note: Don’t forget about the question of the fate of humanity, or as “The Good Place” show puts it, the question of whether or not “the points system” (Karma) is broken. Karma would be broken—some Karma would be FORGIVEN, NOT PAID—if a person did not remain on earth forever in the end. So therefore if Satan finds A JOB with Free Will who is IMMORTAL, then Satan knows that he’s going to have A LOT MORE JOB OPPORTUNITIES, and that is relevant information. And again, the only way that the answer is going to be found is by TESTING JOBS that are IDENTIFIED per the plot of The Book of Job. 

So therefore, I submit, that’s the significance of the reference to the Contacts List, to wit: USING Mr. Ex MBA as A FRONT for a WIDER JOB SEARCH in what would turn-out to be a significant organized crime spree that put influential US citizens under duress to commit heinously corrupt acts and thereby ceded control of major business, legal and governmental organizations to the Drug Lord/Satan.

ALSO NOTE, however, that although Satan’s overall MOTIVE was NOT FINANCIAL, the Drug Lord/Satan nevertheless HAD TO GET PAID BY MR. EX MBA to AVOID BECOMING A “C U NEXT TUESDAY 2 PAY YOU 4 THE PRENATAL VITAMINS” BITCH, which makes this case of Mr. Ex MBA’s WHINE over my un-dead body an extra B.F.D. 

Don’t forget that we now have EVIDENCE (the “Howe” word) that gives us CAUSE to conclude that Mr. Ex MBA was NOT A ROBOCOP—we have established the possibility that Mr. Ex MBA was NOT JESUS RE-ENACTING THE BOOK OF JOB, as Satan GAMBLED that he was (that’s what the “Howe” word establishes)—and Satan LOST THE BET about my innocence, so therefore UNLESS Satan DECIDES to change his own destiny, he is also going to have PERSONAL FINANCIAL LIABILITY for the organized crime spree against me that he FOLLOWED MR. EX MBA’S PLAN to commit.}

Drug Lord/Satan: Who makes who out for a fool? If I wanted your business then surely I would be all up in it, so why do you suppose I’m not?

{My note: Satan would have to figure-out how to get reassurance that this was REALLY Jesus talking about The Book of Job, not Mr. Ex MBA talking about the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan! lol Think about it: If Satan KNOWS that he can’t see ONE NUMBER—Jesus’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER— then how does Satan KNOW that there are not OTHER NUMBERS he can’t see? NO ONE CAN KNOW WHAT THEY DON’T KNOW. That’s the problem. That’s the risk that Satan is taking by talking to Mr. Ex MBA without being able to “hack”—“CLONE” with Satan’s own mind, like “Venom” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8CdcCD5V-d8—Mr. Ex MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER.}

Mr. Ex MBA: Ahaha my good sir nobody has ever called me Shirley before, but that’s OK, because I know I’m a deal-closer with an unbroken record.

*Santana’s “Oye Como Va,” Mr. Ex MBA’s all-time favorite song, still repeating on blast*

And what you are forgetting is that this opportunity never even crossed your mind before I told you about it, amirite? But how would that be possible unless you don’t know what I know? 

Seinfeld: The Pitch https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N9aewEIDSJU

Drug Lord/Satan:  

{My note: The Drug Lord/Satan would be FORCED TO ADMIT two things: 

(1) the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan was dreadfully dastardly—premeditated acts of deranged deadly treason against innocent dependents and human infants at-large and boundary-crossing into “God’s Lane” (the LEGAL lane, the HELPY HELPERTON lane, the GOVERNMENT lane, the RELIGION lane, the SCIENCE lane, etc.) so.hard. that it made SMUGGLING ILLEGAL DRUGS sound like the work of the hands of those on THE STRAIGHT AND NARROW path; 

and

(2) YET such a dirty deed had never even crossed the Drug Lord’s/Satan’s mind—recall that Satan couldn’t SEE Mr. Ex MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER in the “Pi phone book” (meaning that Satan couldn’t “CLONE” Mr. Ex MBA with his own mind), and we now know (that’s our HYPOTHESIS, which is fully-supported by the “Howe” word EVIDENCE) that it’s NOT because Mr. Ex MBA was a ROBOCOP, so there must be another explanation—and the Drug Lord/Satan did NOT just fall off the turnip truck. 

So that’s a tricky situation to navigate (WELCOME TO MY WORLD!), because Howdy Doody—who draws a SALARY of about $200k per year to be an INTERNATIONAL DRUG LORD CONSULTANT FOR-HIRE—is really confident in his knowledge, so therefore Howdy Doody must KNOW WHAT HE KNOWS, right? 

Wrong. 

George Costanza: You know, it must be impossible for a Spanish person to order “seltzer” and not get “salsa.”

George Costanza is a misogynistic racist c u next Tuesday who doesn’t need any hair because he’s got NOTHING in his head, so therefore it would be a waste of hair.

Mr. Ex MBA is not A SEEKER of hidden Truth who WHITTLES-DOWN OPTIONS by SAYING NO TO FICTION. 

Mr. Ex MBA is A POSITIVE THINKER—and a MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER—who ENLARGES THE POSSIBILITIES OF SUCCESS by GETTING TO YES! 

So therefore unless and until YOU KNOW that the only thing that Mr. Ex MBA actually NOs is the word NO—Mr. Ex MBA only KNOWS THE WORD YES and does not acknowledge the existence of the word NO—you will fall into the trap of falsely assuming that Mr. Ex KNOWS SOMETHING that you don’t. 

Mr. Ex MBA NOs NOTHING and therefore he KNOWS NOTHING.

But to be clear, Mr. Ex MBA does not KNOW ZERO, like Satan (or like a Drug Lord, who presumably knows a lot of Zero but not infinite Zero), and that is why neither Satan nor a Drug Lord—or me or ANYONE ELSE—could ever SEE what Mr. Ex MBA KNEW, to wit: It’s impossible to SEE NOTHING! 

I really want to emphasize this Legal point: Mr. Ex MBA is NOT EVIL. 

My hypothesis is that Mr. Ex MBA is NOTHING—he is the absence of NO—and therefore he is incapable of KNOWING (NO’ing) *either* GOOD *or* EVIL.

And THAT’S the hypothesis (fully-supported with the “Howe” word EVIDENCE) to explain WHY SATAN COULD NOT FIND MR. EX MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER in the “Pi phone book,” NOT because Mr. Ex MBA was one of Jesus’s many ROBOCOPS. 

I submit that Mr. Ex MBA’s number is actually the ONE GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER of a person with Free Will that is UNLISTED in the “Pi phone book”!

Mr. Ex MBA’s number is “D’Oh!” (it’s the actual “Oh” on the phone keypad); it’s NULL, it’s VOID, it’s Empty, it’s NOTHING, it’s what is CONVENTIONALLY called “zero.”

It’s not that no other soul with Free Will would have WANTED the number “zero,” but ONCE THE NUMBER WAS TAKEN BY MR. EX MBA, then that option ceased to be available to anyone else.

What I’m hypothesizing is that Mr. Ex MBA used his Free Will to MAKE A DECISION THAT WASN’T RELATIVELY EVIL BUT IT WASN’T JUST, EITHER; I’m hypothesizing that Mr. Ex MBA’s decision was IMAGINARY, which means NOT A DECISION.

In the beginning, every soul with Free Will had ONE JOB to do—make a decision between “staying” (with Jesus/Good) or “going” (making a wrong turn down some RELATIVE Evil-ness road or other)—and the hypothesis is that Mr. Ex MBA DECIDED-TO “IGNORE REALITY” AND REPLACE REALITY WITH MR. EX MBA’S “FUTURE DECISIONS.” 

The First Show About Nothing: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sW3y94xedCI

NBC Exec: So what have you two come up with? 

George: Nothing happens on the show. It’s just like life: You eat, you go shopping, you read; you eat, you read, you go shopping.

NBC Exec: You read? You read on the show?

Jerry: I don’t know about the reading. We didn’t discuss the reading.

{My note: I, for one, think the reading would be the best part of the show!}

*negotiation stalls out*

George: [to NBC Exec] I, for one, am not going to compromise my artistic integrity. And I’ll tell you something else: THIS IS THE SHOW, AND WE’RE NOT GONNA CHANGE IT!

*George walks out*

*Jerry stays to pitch a show about Jerry managing a CIRCUS*

*NBC Exec has a date with Elaine*

More specifically, I’m saying that Mr. Ex MBA could have made a decision to REMOVE THE WORD “NO” FROM EXISTENCE—to ignore Jesus—for the purpose of REPLACING THE ENTIRETY OF REALITY WITH WHATEVER MR. EX MBA WANTED TO “YES,” aka MR. EX MBA’S DESIRES.

This would not have shed any blood by force, but in fact it would have SHED ALL THE BLOOD there is for ALL TIME by REMOVING REALITY FROM EXISTENCE and REPLACING REALITY WITH MR. EX MBA’S GOVERNOR MODULE!

And then regarding what I’m saying about Mr. Ex MBA having a GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER “zero,” I’m saying that a NON-DECISION, by definition, is “zero” decision. 

Jesus’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER is not “zero,” it’s A CONSTANT FRACTION OF Pi.

Recall from the above-referenced discussion in Article 7 (so we’re “assuming facts not yet in evidence” for argument’s sake now, subject to later dot-connection): 

Every DECISION of Free Will to do Evil has a corresponding EXIT RAMP direction on a particle compass—that means a certain number of degrees on the particle compass RELATIVE-TO the Good direction—and (as also discussed above), Jesus’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER is the distance of one degree on the particle compass (the width, aka diameter, of one particle), which means that Jesus’s number (which would also be the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER of a ROBOCOP that was doing Jesus’s business) is A CONSTANT FRACTION OF Pi.

QUESTION: What direction on a particle compass corresponds to Mr. Ex MBA’s alleged GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER “zero”? 

ANSWER: Common sense says that a particle’s STARTING DIRECTION at the Big Bang (which, as discussed in Article 7, is the 4-d Forward direction on a particle compass) corresponds to the GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER “zero,” because that direction represents “NO DECISION”; it’s where all decision-makers BEGIN. 

So until there is a decision—or if there is “zero” decision—then the particle compass won’t budge. That would be called the “zero direction” on the particle compass. 

And in fact, the particle compass will be pointing in the opposite direction as the Good direction (the Good direction corresponds to GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER Pi.)

QUESTION: So is it more accurate to say that “zero” is a DIRECTION of a NON-DECISION on a particle compass, and the corresponding GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER is “negative Pi”? 

ANSWER: No, because “negative Pi” is SOMETHING, and “zero” decision is NOTHING; it is IMPOSSIBLE for a person with Free Will to have a “negative Pi” GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER, because that number (negative Pi) corresponds to SOMETHING that HAS NO GOVERNOR MODULE (no decision-maker)! When a decision-maker exists and there is “zero” decision, then we must say that the decision-maker’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER is “zero.” 

The PURPOSE of this discussion is to overcome Satan’s presumed argument that he is fairly entitled to assume that Mr. Ex MBA is a ROBOCOP of Jesus because there’s no other reasonable explanation for why Satan cannot see Mr. Ex MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER. 

So what we need to do is show that IT’S POSSIBLE that Mr. Ex has Free Will *and* a GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER that it would be impossible for Satan to see, both:  

(1) IN THE BEGINNING, when Mr. Ex MBA was making the NON-DECISION;

and

(2) IN THE PRESENT-DAY.

And we’ve met our “burden of proof”!

Check it out:

(1) we’ve shown that in the beginning, Satan wouldn’t have been able to know about Mr. Ex MBA’s existence as a decision-maker, because there wouldn’t have been any MOVEMENT OF A PARTICLE COMPASS for Satan to *DETECT*;

and

(2) we’ve also shown that in the present-day (as it also was in the beginning), Satan can’t see “zero” in the Pi phone book (because there are no zeroes in Pi.)

QUESTION: What direction on a particle compass corresponds to Satan’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER Zero (the infinite absence of every digit of Pi)? 

ANSWER: The direction at a 90-degree angle relative-to the Good direction; the Good direction and Satan’s direction are 100% out of phase.

So now the proverbial ball is Satan’s court; I’m not making any proposal (I’m happy with “Howe” things are), but nor am I standing in the way of Satan deciding that he wants to change his DESTINY. 

One more thing….

If my hypothesis is correct, then there’s no way for Mr. Ex to operate TRADITIONALLY, within “the points system” (as Karma is described on the show “The Good Place”); it’s only possible to use “the points system” if there is a CHOICE-MAKER who ASSUMED THE RISK of making a *specific* Unjust choice. 

Mr. Ex MBA WILLFULLY DISREGARDED THE RISKS for the purpose of NEGATING THE LAW altogether! 

In effect, Mr. Ex MBA assumed ALL THE RISK in Reality with the *specific* Unjust choice to NEGATE REALITY.  

In this hypothetical, Mr. Ex MBA abstained from choice-making with the *specific intent* of REPLACING REALITY WITH HIS GOVERNOR MODULE—to avoid the consequences of making an Unjust choice!—and so Mr. Ex MBA EFFECTIVELY MADE HIMSELF A 100 EVIL-SYMPATHETIC NON-CHOICE MAKER, which is an apt description of Satan’s Legal situation, *except* that unlike Satan (who knows 100 Evil), Mr. Ex disavowed KNOWLEDGE of both Good and Evil.

So therefore (I would *guess*), Mr. Ex MBA would have to be placed in Satan’s PERMANENT CUSTODY on earth. That (again, I am *guessing*) would be fair to everyone. 

Plus, that outcome would make sense of the FACT that the relationship between Mr. Ex MBA and I ended and two new permanent relationships were formed—one between Jesus and me and the other between Satan and Mr. Ex MBA—at the exact same time I walked out the door of THE RAINBOW HILL HOUSE on 8/29/2010 to follow Jesus instead of Mr. Ex MBA. 

Think about it: If I’m correct, and assuming that Satan is pleased with his destiny—in other words, if Satan does not have Free Will—then THERE WAS A SIMULTANEOUS RE-ARRANGEMENT OF FOUR IMMORTAL INDIVIDUALS’ PERMANENT PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS on one set of facts.

Mr. Ex MBA: [*in my imagination, enthusiastically reciting one of his favorite cheerful slogans*] 15 FOREVER BABY! YEAH BABY!

ACCORDING TO MR. EX MBA, IT’S THE UNHAPPY PERSON WHO NEEDS TO TAKE HAPPY PILLS UNDER MR. EX MBA’S SUPER-VISION FOR THE PURPOSE OF KEEPING MR. EX MBA HAPPY.

So therefore—and this is my exemplary point—if Mr. Ex MBA is UNHAPPY under Satan’s SUPER-VISION, then Mr. Ex MBA can TAKE HIS OWN MEDICINE and BECOME HAPPY AGAIN according to Mr. Ex MBA’s own STANDARD, which Satan can APPLY TO MR. MBA UNFAIRLY, just as Mr. Ex MBA applied that STANDARD unfairly to others, for the purpose of KEEPING SATAN HAPPY unless and until Mr. Ex MBA is COMMITTED TO APPLYING A LAWFUL “MEDICINE” STANDARD FAIRLY TO OTHERS.

If Satan does not have Free Will, then he cannot change, but Mr. Ex MBA can change and SHOULD BE EXPECTED TO CHANGE TO BE FAIR TO SATAN, and in that process, Mr. Ex MBA will fulfill the destiny that HE CHOSE WITH HIS OWN FREE WILL, to wit: To REPLACE *THE ETERNAL LAW* WITH HIS OWN GOVERNOR MODULE. 

But there is only ONE LAW, of course. 

It’s impossible to be ABOVE THE LAW, as Mr. Ex MBA tried to be with the “I CHOOSE TO DO *NOTHING WRONG*” SCAM THAT *STOLE EVERYTHING IN REALITY*.

And then on earth Mr. Ex MBA literally FAKED-OUT SATAN and made the Eternal Lord of Evil his BITCH and REPLACED THE RULE OF LAW IN THE USA, which was founded on THE LAW, by murdering the Good part of God and DESIGNATING HIMSELF, MR. EX MBA, AS THE VICTIM of the non-existent CRIMES of the Good part of God! 

And you can bet your BOTTOM US dollar that Mr. Ex MBA will CRY WOLF AGAINST SATAN infinity times louder than he cried wolf against the ABSOLUTELY HARMLESS Good part of God, but guess what? Mr. Ex MBA replaced Jesus with Mr. Ex MBA!  So Imma guess that Jesus will suddenly turn stone-cold deaf to Mr. Ex MBA’s cries, which will be fair because as The Book of Job goes to show, the OG Job, aka the Good part of God, was perplexed about why the Almighty One seemed to be deaf to Job’s cries against Satan, and now we SEE that the reason was because Mr. Ex MBA was BITCH-SLAPPING SATAN along with the Good part of God, and IT IS SATAN’S JOB TO GET JUSTICE FOR SATAN, so there was nothing that Jesus could do!

So therefore (my hypothesis is), Mr. Ex MBA will have to BECOME LAWFUL TO BE FAIR TO SATAN and then THE LAW will protect Mr. Ex MBA from Satan in return.

This would not mean, however, that Mr. Ex MBA is going to be “become Just like Jesus,” the same as “some rough beast slouching toward Bethlehem to be born” could do.

No, that would be impossible, because the hypothesis is that Mr. Ex MBA REPLACED JESUS WITH HIS OWN GOVERNOR MODULE, so Mr. Ex MBA’s own GOVERNOR MODULE couldn’t “bring Jesus back.” 

This means that Jesus would have to “register the DESIRES” of Mr. Ex MBA to treat Satan fairly in *specific factual situations*, and then Jesus would MAKE IT HAPPEN, not Mr. Ex MBA’s own GOVERNOR MODULE. But Mr. Ex MBA would not know the difference—it would be THE SAME EXPERIENCE FOR MR. EX MBA AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN—because after making the decision to be “zero” (NOTHING/IMAGINARY), Mr. Ex MBA could not have A *REAL* STAND-ALONE GOVERNOR MODULE. “Mr. Ex MBA” would be an entirely Jesus-implemented LEGAL ENTITY, who operates according to the IMPOSSIBLE-TO-UNDO-CHOICE Mr. Ex MBA made with Free Will to REPLACE JESUS. 

This would make Mr. Ex MBA “fair game” for Satan, as opposed to making Mr. Ex MBA Howdy Doody, despite Mr. Ex MBA’s bang-on Howdy Doody impression WHEN HE IS HAPPY. When Mr. Ex MBA is UNHAPPY, he does a bang-on impression of the T-1000, the shape-shifting TERMINATOR in the movie “Terminator 2: Judgment Day,” because Mr. Ex MBA *BELIEVES* that he is ABOVE THE LAW, so therefore HE HAS NO FEAR OF THE LAW. 

Mr. Ex MBA’s biggest fears are SPIDERS and not receiving what he calls “HIS EGO STROKES” on the regular and—by observation—Mr. Ex MBA also worries about not having enough hand cream and toilet paper rolls under the desk where he sits to use his computer.

QUESTION: If Mr. Ex MBA’s character is the T-1000 Terminator in “Terminator 2: Judgment Day,” then whose character is the “I’LL BE BACK” Terminator (played by former California GOVERNOR Arnold Schwarzenegger)? And where does Satan fit-in to that movie trailer plot? And what about the woman and her kid?

ANSWER: Stay with me to connect some dots that we’ve already laid-out, and you will see the JUDGMENT DAY plot for yourSELF. The real Jesus—with a REAL GOVERNOR MODULE—is analogous to the “I’LL BE BACK” Terminator (played by former California GOVERNOR Arnold Schwarzenegger.) RECALL that according to the hypothesis, the reason why Jesus didn’t intervene to protect the OG Job when Mr. Ex MBA called-up the Drug Lord/Satan to order a hit on Job AND some prenatal vitamins and thereby turned the Drug Lord and Satan into BOY-TOYS of Mr. Ex MBA is because Mr. Ex MBA made the “I will do *NOTHING* WRONG” choice with Free Will, and that REPLACED JESUS AND THE LAW—THE ENTIRETY OF REALITY—with Mr. Ex MBA’s GOVERNOR MODULE, thereby making “Mr. Ex MBA” an entirely Jesus-implemented LEGAL ENTITY (like the T-1000) who operates according to the IMPOSSIBLE-TO-UNDO-CHOICE Mr. Ex MBA made with Free Will to REPLACE JESUS. And don’t forget that JESUS *WRITES THE SCRIPT* OF KARMA, BUT SATAN APPLIES “THE EYE FOR EYE” FORCE OF KARMA ALL BY HIMSELF (with his own mind.) And one way Satan applies the “EYE FOR EYE” Force of Karma is by BY “HACKING” THE GOVERNOR MODULES OF KARMA DELIVERY AGENTS IN THE KARMA SCRIPT to UNLOCK THE FORCE-DELIVERING MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULES. Hence, the prior reference to THING Addams to represent Satan, because Satan’s “hand” controls EVERY THING in Karma. So Satan is THE INVISIBLE HAND OF JUSTICE in the “Terminator 2: Judgment Day” plot. And IN FACT, SATAN IS GOING TO BE THE SCRIPTWRITER OF THAT PLOT IRL. Here’s why: If someone does Satan dirty, e.g., Mr. Ex MBA, then THAT’S GOING TO BE OUTSIDE OF KARMA, because it should be IMPOSSIBLE for Karma (Satan) to be IN Karma! That breaks Karma! And indeed, that’s what Mr. Ex MBA’s “NOTHING” choice did! It broke Karma! So NOW SATAN’S GOT TO GET JUSTICE FOR HIMSELF, and JESUS IS GOING TO HAVE TO HELP SATAN GET JUSTICE—that’s like giving Satan “access” to Jesus (the “I’LL BE BACK” TERMINATOR) to DELIVER JUSTICE—BUT FIRST SATAN HAS TO WRITE A JUST SCRIPT THAT JESUS CAN ENFORCE AGAINST MR. EX MBA (the T-1000.) Satan’s script has to be fair to Mr. Ex MBA, and Mr. Ex MBA has to be fair to Satan. That’s the only possible way to DO JUSTICE in this case. Going out and being an *sshole to an MF because the MF trounced your b*tch-slapped *ss is NOT JUSTICE. You need Jesus to send the “I’LL BE BACK” TERMINATOR to get Justice, and you’ve got to write a Justice script to ENABLE Jesus to send the “I’LL BE BACK” TERMINATOR to give you Justice. And that’s exactly what we see in the Terminator 2: Judgment Day SCRIPT, to wit: We see the “I’LL BE BACK” TERMINATOR hunting the T-1000 Terminator to DO JUSTICE outside of Karma to RIGHT THE WRONGS THAT THE “I’LL BE BACK” TERMINATOR WAS FORCED TO “TURN A BLIND EYE TOWARD” IN THE PAST (not wrongfully, but as a matter of DUE PROCESS, because it’s impossible to connect the dots looking forward, you can only connect the dots looking backward! Mr. Ex had to FIRST DO the harm against the OG Job and Satan before the OG Job and Satan could WRITE THE SCRIPTS to GET JUSTICE for themselves!) And according to my script, which is simple common sense, the only way for Mr. Ex MBA—the T-1000 Terminator character—to STOP THE “I’LL BE BACK” TERMINATOR FROM COMING AFTER HIM is to BE FAIR TO SATAN. To repeat: Satan’s script has to be fair to Mr. Ex MBA, and Mr. Ex MBA has to be fair to Satan. That’s the only possible way to DO JUSTICE in this case. And of course KARMA—Satan’s JOB—IS FAIRNESS, but Mr. Ex MBA does *NOTHING* FAIR, hence, the “I’LL BE BACK” TERMINATOR and the T-1000 TERMINATOR are IN A FULL-ON F*CKING WAR in the movie plot. And then the child character is a reference to a hypothetical Job with Free Will, who would exit Karma by going with Jesus and fleeing from INJUSTICE (Satan and the T-1000 and Evil wherever it’s found) and winning that spiritual war against INJUSTICE for themSELF (and presumably writing their own SCRIPT to get Justice for themSELF, since what gives Mr. Ex MBA the right to FOREVER buddy-up with Satan AGAINST JUSTICE? How is that abomination going to be redressed by Free-Willed people who are JUST LIKE JESUS? Does the “HEY BABY YEAH BABY HASTA LA VISTA BABY! Dishonorable Discharge APP” even.come.close.? I doubt it, but that’s for other Jobs to answer AFTER they are triumphant against Satan in the FIRST “Gladiator” pit and then they realize that Mr. Ex MBA and Satan are NEVER GOING TO STOP taunting them and treating them like playthings in the “Gladiator” pit, AND THAT’S NOT FAIR, the Jobs should be EMPOWERED TO FIGHT BACK in a Jesus-approved FORUM is what I would IMAGINE, so Justice in that case might call for some mad Jesus-empowered “Kung Fu”—like Neo in “The Matrix” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhrNgXJ__n8—for “Anger Management” purposes, which seems intuitively correct because I’VE ALREADY DEVELOPED AN INCURABLE ADDICTION TO IT, and I know I’m unqualified to enter the “Kung Fu” ring! but dang! I would 100 watch that show and I dare say that the NBC executive on Seinfeld would too, like: “Stay tuned for exclusive coverage of ‘ZERO MAN versus Pi MAN FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE NUMBER ___,’ followed by ‘ZERO MAN versus MAN ZERO.’” “FRACTAL MAN versus ZERO MAN” is an impossible versus, because FRACTAL MAN *empowers* every NUMBER except for mine, and I am not Self Conscious so I can’t do “Kung Fu,” but again, IDK what other Jobs envision to be FAIR.) All the POWER in every character is coming from Jesus, yes, but THERE IS SEPARATION OF MINDS and Jesus has to EMPOWER THE JUST AND THE UNJUST ALIKE in the interest of Justice. The reason why it’s “UNKNOWN” whether or not the T-1000 can be stopped (not killed, but made to be fair) is because Satan has to write the script to stop the T-1000, and it’s only Satan who let Mr. Ex MBA unfairly TROUNCE him and stick him with the $314,651,060.00 tab (as of 5/16/25) payable to Jesus with interest compounded annually at 29.99% APR, so Satan doesn’t have to get Justice for himself if he doesn’t want it; every other Injustice is known and must be redressed by Jesus.

The “man of my dreams” back on August 29, 2010 was a (now-deceased) dog trainer named Kevin.

Mr. Ex MBA is A VISIONARY who ADDS VALUE by SHIFTING PARADIGMS. 

And “putting someone to sleep” is not violent, it’s a DISRUPTIVE SOLUTION that REPLACES THE STATUS QUO ANTE to effectuate a happy outcome in an unhappy situation, and that’s a WIN-WIN for all parties concerned.  

Then when you recover from YOUR AMBIEN ADDICTION and THANK MR. EX MBA FOR THE INTERVENTION, Mother Mary can give you a list of everyone who sent you a Get Well card while you were OSTRICHING, so that you can send the Thank You cards for the Get Well cards within a SOCIALLY-ACCEPTABLE TIMEFRAME after you get back to “normal” home sweet home routines and resume watching IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE WITH MR. EX MBA.  

Mr. Ex MBA ESTABLISHES AND FOLLOWS MULTI-GENERATIONAL TRADITIONS. 

Mr. Ex MBA’s speech FOLLOWS WELL-ACCEPTED TOPICAL PROTOCOLS, and he REMAINS ON-POINT, although he will often RE-STRUCTURE COMMUNICATIONS to fit an agreed-upon ORGANIZATIONAL FORMAT, such as email, PowerPoint or Excel; and he can also GENERATE GRAPHICS to TRACK METRICS to ensure PROGRESS, which he monitors on A CONSISTENT BASIS with regularly-issued PROGRESS REPORTS. 

Did you get the memo in the Office Space of your dreams? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jsLUidiYm0w&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD

Mr. Ex MBA appears to have FOUND HIS PASSION as a DYNAMIC LEADER in the SALES AND MARKETING FUNCTION of MAJOR PHARMACEUTICAL ORGANIZATIONS.   

Mr. Ex MBA INSPIRES CONFIDENCE because he is a CONSISTENT CLOSER and a SELF-STARTING GO-GETTER who is committed-to IMPLEMENTING BEST PRACTICES that are consistent with his CORE VALUES, and MOTIVATING HIS TEAM to be OUTSTANDING. 

Mr. Ex MBA does not take “no” for an answer, he takes “no” as a challenge to “get to yes.” 

Mr. Ex MBA OVERCOMES TRADITIONAL LIMITATIONS by THINKING OUTSIDE OF THE BOX to EXPAND THE UNIVERSE OF POSSIBILITIES, ENLARGE SOLUTIONS and GET OTHERS ON-BOARD. 

Mr. Ex MBA achieves ROI in an ACCELERATED TIMEFRAME and MEETS OR EXCEEDS HIS NUMBERS on a YEAR-END BASIS. 

Mr. Ex MBA INCREASES REVENUE and LEADS MULTIPLE INITIATIVES that contribute to the ACHIEVEMENT OF GOALS.  

Based-on my observations, Mr. Ex MBA seemed to have TWO GOALS:

Goal (1), GENERATE A HIGH INCOME FLOW;

and 

Goal (2), ACTIVATE HUMAN RESOURCES in a manner that MAXIMIZED EFFICIENCY and MINIMIZED THREE NEGATIVE FACTORS: 

(a) COST;

and 

(b) COMPLAINTS ABOUT MR. EX MBA made by DEPLOYED HUMAN RESOURCES to THE HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION of any major pharmaceutical organization;

and

(c) GOD.  

But Mr. Ex MBA also put the word EVIL in the swear jar.   

Try to have a discussion with Mr. Ex MBA about GOD or EVIL; it’s like talking to one of those toy cymbal-clanging “hear no Evil 🙉, see no Evil 🙈, speak no Evil 🙊” monkeys. 

If you keep talking about GOD and EVIL, then he concludes that you’ve got a MENTAL ILLNESS that is causing YOUR BRAIN to think NEGATIVE THOUGHTS.

Mr. Ex MBA: [*by observation of Mr. Ex MBA’s CONSISTENT RESPONSE of TRYING TO GET ME CONFINED INDEFINITELY TO A MENTAL HOSPITAL AND/OR FORCIBLY “MEDICATED” upon the occasions of Mr. Ex MBA GETTING MY MEMOS regarding GOD and SATAN*] What soul? What God? What Devil? Our thoughts are a CHEMICAL DANCE!  Our thinking is a DRUG-MEDIATED RESPONSE!

To repeat: Mr. Ex MBA will NOT HESITATE TO FORCEFULLY OBLITERATE YOUR BRAIN’S ACCESS TO NEGATIVE THOUGHTS WITH “MEDICINE” if Mr. Ex MBA’s conservative motivational speeches and a liberal dose of Mark Sanborn educational materials do not REDUCE YOUR NEGATIVE THOUGHTS enough to MAKE MR. EX FEEL BETTER.

And that is not what Mr. Ex MBA calls MEANNESS (oh no, Mr. Dollar Bill!) That is what Mr. Ex calls HELP, and Mr. Ex MBA COVETS BEING THANKED for CALLING 9-1-1 when YOUR NEGATIVE THOUGHTS are OUT OF HIS CONTROL and thereby become A DANGER TO HIS ABILITY TO FEEL HAPPY WITH YOUR BEHAVIOR.

If you want to see THE BADDEST SHOW on Apple TV, watch “Shrinking”; it’s like looking through the lens of a microscope to see where BDE goes in a cryotherapy chamber. I could teach you, but I’d have to charge.

Because Mr. Ex MBA’s number is D’Oh! he never has a GOOD IDEA, but he never has a BAD IDEA, either, he has UNREAL IDEAS only.

Before the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan, there was the BRA WASHER (a plastic device in which to place a bra to protect it from damage in the washing machine); Mr. Ex MBA proposed to invest $10,000 in the BRA WASHER “development cycle,” and at the time OUR WASHING MACHINE WAS 20 YEARS OLD AND WE COULD NOT AFFORD TO REPAIR OR REPLACE IT.

I was like: “So by that standard, I should assume that you never get laid” (quoting Erin Brockovich.)

Before the BRA WASHER investment plan went bust because of my negative response, there was Mr. Ex MBA’s own personal RETIREMENT COMMUNITY business plan that I also disrespectfully rejected.

Question: What, IMO, was wrong with Mr. Ex MBA’s RETIREMENT COMMUNITY business plan (besides the facts that we did not own land or a construction company or have any capital)?

Answer: The plan was to build A “MANAGED” RETIREMENT COMMUNITY with CHEAP SELLER-BUILT, SELLER-FINANCED MANUFACTURED HOMES on SELLER-OWNED CHEAP LAND—aka a TAX SHELTER—to take financial advantage of elderly poor people.

But it is TOO BAD that I met Mr. Ex MBA a few years AFTER I moved away from New York City—

where I moved in 1994 for my Park Avenue job after graduating from Wayne State University Law School in the Motor City (Detroit, Michigan, where I grew up in a suburb called Rochester), and I saw the Broadway play “How To Succeed In Business Without Really Trying” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwDB-N-z5xk—

and I FORGOT all about that Broadway scene by the time I moved to Chicago a couple of years later and fell into Mr. Ex’s trap of NOTHING; 

we met at a Christmas party in 1998 and got married on September 9, 2000, 

then moved to Charleston, Massachusetts in 2001, 

before settling in “The Money Pit” movie, aka THE RAINBOW HILL HOUSE, in East Amwell, New Jersey, in 2003,

because Mr. Ex MBA’s happiness in the rat race depended-on living in the “New York News area” and NOT the “Philly News Area.”

To be slightly more specific…

The Boston condo was sold at a loss.

I liquidated my retirement savings account to cover the loss on the sale of the Boston condo AND to make the $60,000 down-payment on THE RAINBOW HILL HOUSE.

Mr. Ex MBA: *on repeat* Where’s the check? One patent, two patents, MAKE IT HAPPEN!

At least I can take solace that Satan can’t shut me up for a fool in that scene.}

Mr. Ex MBA: That’s what I’m saying! All right all right all right! This deal is going to be FANTABULOUS for both of us! I’m ready when you’re ready; you give me a timeframe for delivery and I’ll make the frozen assets available for your inspection.  

{My note: This sounds like it’s addressing Satan’s concern at Job 1:10-11: “You have always put a wall of protection around [Job]…But reach out and take away everything [Job] has, and [Job] will surely curse you to your face!”}

🌈*END OF FLASH-BACK TO SOMEWHERE IN THE RAINBOW HILL HOUSE, c. February, 2010*🌈

END OF DREAM SEQUENCE

Then lo and behold, on or about 8/28/2010 (it could have been that day, or maybe it was the day before or a couple of days before), my underwater garage was ACTUALLY FILLED with boxes of custom-made prenatal vitamins from Mexico, EXACTLY according to the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan that Mr. Ex MBA had presented to me 6 months earlier. 

I was like: OK, there went the IRA! BUT WUT THE?…I DON’T UNDERSTAND?…HOW COULD IT BE POSSIBLE? 

Unfortunately, I didn’t think too hard about the answer, I merely concluded that there was no public danger, because WHO IN HELL WOULD *ACTUALLY* BUY AND EAT PRENATAL VITAMINS FROM OUR GARAGE?

What I *should have* stopped to think-about right then and continued to keep in mind, however, was A KNOWN FACT (which I KNEW already but was not focused-on anymore because I already CONSIDERED *and* NOPED *and* SCOFFED-AT *and* DGAFed the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan c. February, 2010):  THE KNOWN FACT THAT MR. EX MBA’s PRENATAL VITAMIN BUSINESS PLAN AND A FEW DOLLARS IN MY IRA ARE *NOT* CONTROLLING THE DRUG TRADE IN MEXICO FROM MY UNDERWATER GARAGE! 

The obvious answer—turning Mr. Ex MBA into a mule—doesn’t make any sense, because these prenatal vitamins were made precisely per the Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan, and I don’t think it’s reasonable to conclude that MULES WRITE DRUG SMUGGLING PLANS for Drug Lords to follow.  

No.

So.

So what are the other possibilities? 

<sounds of crickets chirping>

Cue The Book of Job, set in the land of Uz, which is a whoreable, God-awful place where every enlightened person ends-up before the beginning of the end of their suffering.

*PEEKING BEHIND THE SCENES 🎬 in my readers’ minds I FORESEE VERY UNREASONABLE DOUBT*

Reader: *unreasonably skeptical* Tell me more about this Prenatal Vitamin Business Plan, according to which Mr. Ex MBA served as the Drug Lord’s/Satan’s “FRONT”—

deploying powerful action words in combination with persuasive speaking techniques that Mr. Ex MBA learned by heavily consuming self-help materials published by Hall of Fame keynote speaker and international bestselling author Mark Sanborn—

for the purpose of gaining control over influential US citizens with the premeditated intent of causing said citizenry to commit organized crime and thereby cede control of major business, legal and governmental organizations to the Drug Lord/Satan? 

Me: Yes, we must presume that the Drug Lord/Satan followed Mr. Ex around behind the scenes as Mr. Ex “deposited bait” with “targets” in positions of public trust, then after the “bait” was SWALLOWED—when it was TOO LATE for the targets to get “the hook” out of their situations without coughing up EVERYTHING—the Drug Lord/Satan swooped in BY “CLANDESTINE” MEANS OF WHICH MR. EX MBA WAS COMPLETELY UNAWARE (FOR EXAMPLE, SATAN HACKED EACH TARGET’S GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER IN THE “Pi PHONE BOOK” AND USED IT TO UNLOCK THE TARGET’S MOTOR-FUNCTION MODULE) and shook the targets down to get them to commit the heinous acts of organized crime, openly implicating themselves in the process, and thereby irreparably harming (destroying, in fact) the functioning of the institutions in which the targets were embedded, and turning the institutions into puppet regimes of the Drug Lord/Satan. 

Reader: And you actually have EVIDENCE of this? 

Me: It’s elementary, my dear reader! 

IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN the NON-EXISTENT CREDIBILITY OF MR. EX MBA—Mr. Ex MBA’s incredibly on-point Mark Sanborn imitation—that was PERSUADING PEOPLE to openly commit outlandish and heinous criminal acts against their own interests at Mr. Ex MBA’s request. 

D’Oh!

BUT there was MOST ASSUREDLY A CLEAR AND CREDIBLE THREAT POSED BY THE SOURCE OF THE PRENATAL VITAMINS IN MR. EX MBA’S GARAGE that could EASILY have PERSUADED PEOPLE to openly commit outlandish and heinous criminal acts against their own interests at Mr. Ex MBA’s request. 

*END OF PEEKING BEHIND THE SCENES 🎬*  

And that’s exactly what was SEEN! 

On the morning of 8/28/2010, the “PEOPLE ARE DYING TO COMMUNICATE” MIRACULOUS MESSAGE was written on my blank email, so I WAS 100 FOCUSED-ON FIGURING-OUT HOW TO FOLLOW GOD BETTER FROM THEN-ON.

12 hours after the miracle of the email, I announced my intent to leave Mr. Ex MBA for good, if he didn’t agree to follow Jesus with me, the way he promised the priest—the priest he insisted had to officiate our September, 2000 wedding—he was committed to doing.

24 hours after the miracle of the email, I left Mr. Ex MBA for good, after he refused to even talk about following Jesus with me.

48 hours after the miracle of the email (and don’t forget that the delivery of the prenatal vitamins and the miracle of the email happened VERY CLOSE TOGETHER ON THE TIMELINE OF RELEVANT EVENTS)—corresponding in The Book of Job to the Lord’s removal of the “hedge of protection” around Job—I became an involuntary patient in a mental institution and a 4-time attempted murder victim, complete with resurrection at the morgue, *losing everything* in one.day., Day 1, 8/30/2010.

Satan: [in my imagination, “dying to communicate”] 

Prince: [in my imagination, “dying to communicate,” singing “Face Down”] Those who know the number and don’t call, f*ck all y’all.

I have gone through many trials and tribulations trying to get the number of the Justice Department of God.

Today, 2/4/2026, is the 15-YEAR ANNIVERSARY of a corrupt judge in the Superior Court of New Jersey (Judge Hany Mawla, the same judge who would preside over D-Day while I was in chains) entering the 2/4/2011 “S(t)ealing Order,” as I call it—but let’s go-ahead and call it what it actually is: THE PEDO FILE DESTRUCTION ORDER—my righteous violation of which on 3/3/2011 was the basis for the same judge signing an arrest warrant and issuing an AMBER ALERT against me on patently false charges, then setting a statutorily excessive AND per se unconstitutional $400,000 cash bail, which I had no way to pay, so I was stuck in jail for 280 days, and that was only the TIP (the Tippe Top, I would call it today) of the iceberg of corruption that ran so deep and was so wide that it toppled the RULE OF LAW in the entire USA and handed control over to God (by way of the Drug Lord/Satan) via a multi-state pileup with the FBI’s willfully blind eye teetering like a cherry on top. 

And in fact, the aforementioned judge issued a TRO against me while I was locked-in a psychiatric hospital being murdered, and the evidentiary basis of the TRO—

that evidentiary basis was the password-protected, attorney-client privileged, confidential, stolen and illegally-distributed 8/30/2010 “BlackBerry Emails,” or “BBEs,” as I call them, which contained what I call “God/Cat/Tsunami/Universe/Sexual Content”—

was the same evidentiary basis upon which I was locked-in the psychiatric hospital, AND the BBEs were proven on-the-record at the mid-September, 2011 TRO Trial (where I was the defendant) in that same judge’s courtroom to be FAKE/PLANTED EVIDENCE (which the judge simply ignored.) 

Ergo, the MIRACULOUSLY-MADE FAKE/PLANTED BBEs that Mr. Ex MBA stole, printed-out and gave to both the judge and the psychiatric hospital TIE TOGETHER ALL OF THE ORGANIZED CRIMINALS—including the murderers in the psychiatric hospitals and their cohorts in private practice (who had a duty to NOT FOLLOW in murderous footsteps based-on FAKE/PLANTED EVIDENCE)—with a very neat blow *bow.

Thomas Paine: [*in my imagination*, upon returning to the USA via reincarnation, quoting Charleston Heston from the 1968 movie “Planet of the Apes”] Oh.My.God. I’m back. All that time…We finally REALLY DID IT [looking at the scrapped hunk of junk that used to be the Statute of Liberty]. You maniacs! You blew it up! Damn you! GOD DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!

—Thomas Paine, “The Crisis,” 12/23/1776

Today (2/10/2026 as I’m editing this), the USA is in an APOCALYPTIC CRISIS.

In joy, 

Frank