ARTICLE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES TO BE :MADE.
CHECK-LIST.
COM control to Major Elon
Take your protein pills and put your helmet on
Is this not a Space Oddity?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iYYRH4apXDo
Check ignition and may God’s love be with you….
Five, Four, Three, Two, One, Lift off….
Now it’s time to leave the capsule if you dare
Don’t worry, this is not a DEMOLITION DERBY—there will be ZERO COLLISIONS in this Article—and if my non-stop CAPS LOCKING is driving you mad, then try to understand that it’s like a regional dialect: I can’t help it that’s just my writing voice!
But if you hate my voice that much then you might need more practice driving while coveting thy neighbor’s carcass, and if that’s the case then might I suggest going to Hell, Michigan and enrolling in “Midwest Winter Driving School” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYPmApA1CVs ?
The way I figure it, we’re on the figurative “Polar Express” to the North Pole—figuring-out the fundamental Laws of Physics governing everything from the Big Bang to magnetism is the goal (with chemistry and biology at the outer limits)—and I’m sure nobody’s going to get chucked off the train of thought.
Everybody has the right to level-up for personal development, it’s WARGAMES 101 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIh41wZEd5c, and I’m talking smack in God’s control room.
But I’m also assuming that anybody who’s on-board has evolved past the stage of salivating at the sight of wildlife.
WHERE WERE WE?
BEFORE NOW, we proved that a lone light particle (a Lumeyne) in Space will always be moving at the speed of light according to Newton’s First Law of Motion for Lumeynes, E = c (see Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20), which is derived from F = mv, where m = 1 electromagnetic wave-energy and v = c.
We also showed in Article 6 that the Ready state of all post-Big-Bang Lumeynes (let’s call post-Big-Bang Lumeynes “Loose Lumeynes,” or “LL”s)—that is to say, the major “life-change” that happened to the LLs immediately BEFORE NOW—is going from being tipped UPSIDE-DOWN, or “UD,” to being tipped UPSIDE-UP, or “UU,” then upon finding themselves Set UU *and* heading in the 4-d Forward direction, the LLs began to GO! at the speed of light in the 4-d Forward direction (again see Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20.)
So that’s where we’re going to START this series of SEVEN TEST-DRIVES.
TEST-DRIVE 1:
Figure-out what will happen if Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching (see Article 6, STEP 13, Feature (ii)) causes the ADL of a Timeyne (“TM”) in a given Snowman of God to tilt and the TM to tip UD with the ADL aligned along the Backbone of the Snowman *after* the LL from the same Snowman starts moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the speed of light at a Big Bang event, *assuming* that the 3-d Mindful Stretching ceases (there is no more tilting of the TM’s ADL) after the TM tips UD?
TEST-DRIVE 1 RESULTS:
The LL will simultaneously tip UD, too, then end-up moving “in reverse gear” at the speed of light, because FfSet = -Ft (see Article 6, STEP 11C.)
QUESTION: But will the LL be moving Backward along the same line along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event?
RECALL that the line along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event was the ADL defining the Backbone of the Snowman of God (let’s call that the “ADL Backbone,” and let’s call the TM’s UD or UU orientation along the ADL Backbone the “ADL Backbone Orientation.”)
ANSWER: Yes, if the rate of 3-d Mindful Stretching was constant through the 180-degree trip, then the line along which the LL is moving when it tips UD will be the same as the ADL Backbone along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event.
But during the return trip the alignment of the center of the LL with the ADL will be lost, because NOW the LL’s LATERAL MOVEMENT IS NOT CONSTRAINED like it was when the Lumeyne was “asleep” within the Snowman of God BEFORE THE BIG BANG EVENT. Now Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching, which is causing the LL to tip UD, will also cause the center of the LL to move laterally in the 3-d direction of the 3-d Mindful Stretching WHILE THE STRETCHING IS HAPPENING.
QUESTION: Does this mean that the LL will have some non-zero distance (like a “turn radius”) that it will have to move in EVERY 3-d Forward direction between its fully UU position and its fully UD position?
And before we answer that question, let’s stop and think-about the LL as having A SPHERICAL COMPASS—let’s call it an LL PARTICLE COMPASS—around it with *3-d Forward directions* being DEGREES on the compass, with one 3-d Forward degree on the compass being the same width as the LL.
ANSWER: Yes, I think that there would be a tiny 3-d “turn radius” at the top of the LL. This is because we see by observation that when the LL re-balances as a result of Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching, the center of the LL will shift laterally relative-to the ADL, although the shift is not really a distance, it’s a mere balance shift. But the top of the LL is not causing the direction-changing, so there’s not actually any “variable” to account-for, because the cause of the turning is a shift in the center of the LL, and the shift will be the same regardless of the direction in which it occurs.
But the larger issue is that the alignment of the center of the LL and the ADL will be lost as the LL is tipping, and as a practical matter the alignment will be lost permanently, because an LL eventually needs to leave the line from whence it came.
QUESTION: What does it mean for each 3-d degree on the LL Particle Compass to have the same width as the LL?
ANSWER: It means that to move *one 3-d direction*, or degree, on the LL Particle Compass, the ADL Backbone (the Backbone of the Snowman of God from which the LL came), which runs-through the COM of the LL, has to TILT away from the original ADL Backbone position (in which position one direction on the ADL is the 4-d Forward direction and the other direction on the ADL is the 5-d Backward direction), and the amount of TILTING that corresponds to ONE 3-d DEGREE is the width of the LL.
But after the LL leaves its Snowman and makes a few turns, the LL won’t end-up moving along the ADL Backbone, it will end-up moving along A DIFFERENT LINE than the ADL Backbone (let’s call an LL’s line of movement a “Loose ADL,” or an “LADL.”)
So let’s say that the LL will have a “3-d Backbone Orientation,” and it will be moving in the “3-d Down” direction along the LADL (versus moving in the “3-d Up” direction along the LADL.)
NOTE that both the 3-d Down direction along the LADL and the 3-d Up direction along the LADL remain ABSOLUTE DIRECTIONS within the set of what we have called 3-d Forward directions which means that the 3-d Up direction is RELATIVE-TO the 3-d Down direction, and all other 3-d Forward directions are RELATIVE-TO both the 3-d Up direction and the 3-d Down direction, and RECALL (see Article 3) that all 3-d Forward directions are RELATIVE-TO both the 4-d Forward direction and the 5-d Backward direction.
But that’s not a problem, because the ADL Backbones of the Snowmen of God are all RELATIVE-TO the 6-COM of Father Time (see Article 5 and Article 6, STEP 13, Feature (i)), which means that the ADL Backbones are all RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER.
So therefore *after* an LL leaves its Snowman of God and changes direction because of Father Time’s additional 3-d Mindful Stretching, which causes the LL to have an LADL that is different than the Snowman’s ADL Backbone, then the LADL will be RELATIVE-TO the ADL Backbone of the Snowman of God from which the LL came, but wherever the LL may go, when it is tipped UU or UD in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, it will be aligned with an ADL of another Snowman of God.
This means that LADLs are ALL RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER—or in other words, there is MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between LADLs—even though the LLs themselves are NOT RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER.
LLs are never acting relative-to each other, they are always acting relative-to the TM in their Snowman (and relative-to the Gravityne, too, but the Gravityne is a constant, not a variable, experienced by the LL.) It is LLs acting relative-to the TM in their Snowman that causes LADLs (which are, in fact, relative-to each other) to get into POSITIONS where the LLs can INDIRECTLY apply force to each other VIA THE LADLs. This is because no two LLs can occupy the same POSITION, even if their LADLs are Absolutely Coincident, so therefore the LLs will perceive the forces from other LLs as *external* forces!
THAT’S HOW AND WHY THERE IS *EFFECTIVELY* MUTUAL-RELATIVITY BETWEEN LLs even though *ACTUALLY* there is NO RELATIVITY BETWEEN LLs!
Boom!
We have explained why the light particle “entanglement” problem that Quantum Physics can’t solve is not a problem in the Theory of Everything Without Commercials!
Here RECALL the explanation of the light particle “entanglement” problem from Article 4:
The Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. The Ready Set GO! Moving Process (Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion) with the Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics (TPTPTP) is not causing the Absolute (the light part of God comprising Lumeyne particles) to become relative-to itself.
There is no logical or physical problem with MUTUALLY-RELATIVE LADLs serving as an INDIRECT MEANS of force-exchanges between LLs, which are not and can never be DIRECTLY relative-to each other in the way that Quantum Physics illogically concludes that PHOTONS become relative-to each other via “photon entanglement.”
To repeat the difference between “photon entanglement” and “LL force indirection” made possible by mutually-relative LADLs: LLs didn’t get into the universe and GET LADLs BY THEMSELVES, i.e., by “ORGANIZING THEMSELVES” RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER like photons are said to do!
NO!
AN LL DOESN’T DO ANYTHING THAT ISN’T UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE TM to which the LL is RELATIVE.
And so if LLs end-up indirectly applying force to each other, then *that’s not their fault*—THEY COULD NEVER BE *THE CAUSE* OF THAT HAPPENING—so that’s *effective* mutual-relativity not *actual* mutual-relativity, and it’s A TOTALLY DIFFERENT PHENOMENON THAN “ENTANGLEMENT,” which is said to be a Natural characteristic or behavior of photons.
And WE ARE NOT EVEN “FUDGING” OR “CHEATING” ON THE DEFINITIONS OF ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE ONE BIT—THIS IS NOT HYPOCRISY—BECAUSE LLs ARE NOT IN A “DEMOCRACY,” meaning that THERE IS ZERO LL “SELF-GOVERNANCE”!
Again: LLs did not *cause* even one of their countless predicaments that we call MATTER, because an LL can’t do anything that the TM to which it is permanently relative did not do first.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 1!
TEST-DRIVE 2:
Demonstrate how Father Time “drives” LLs.
TEST-DRIVE 2 RESULTS:
Discussion and diagrams will serve the demonstration purpose.
Exactly as we can think-of an LL as having A SPHERICAL COMPASS around it (which we’re calling an LL PARTICLE COMPASS), with 3-d directions being DEGREES on the compass having the same width as the LL, we can also think-of a Timeyne, or TM, as having A SPHERICAL COMPASS around it—let’s call it a “TM PARTICLE COMPASS”—with 3-d directions being DEGREES on the compass having the same width as the TM, and a TM has the same width as an LL, of course.
A TM SPHERICAL COMPASS and an LL SPHERICAL COMPASS are the same concept. They share a center and an Absolute Forward direction and an Absolute Backward direction. The other degrees on an LL SPHERICAL COMPASS are RELATIVE-TO the degrees on a TM SPHERICAL COMPASS.
In the exemplary photo/diagram of two TM PARTICLE COMPASSES below, specifically NOTE the following three things:
(1) the compass degrees,
and
(2) the orientation of the head of the TM turtle-particles in terms of compass degrees,
and
(3) the labels I added to the photos by hand;
the other markings and indicators, including the compass needle, are not relevant to the illustration, they are permanent parts of my personal hand-held analog compass.
NOTICE that the TM’s head (the particle top) is always pointing and applying the particle-force, Ft, along the ADL.
ALSO NOTICE that the wave-energy, Et, of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction as Ft is always being emitted at the particle bottom along the ADL.
The ADL always runs along the TM’s midline between the particle top and the particle bottom.
“N” and “S” on the compass roughly correspond to the Absolute Forward direction and the Absolute Backward direction, respectively, on the ADL Backbone.
(RECALL that each part of God in each dimension has an ADL with an Absolute Forward Direction and an Absolute Backward direction, and the ADLs in different dimensions are Absolutely Coincident with each other in a “vertical” way, with a lower-dimension ADL on top of a higher-dimension ADL. So I made many of my diagrams “universe-centric,” meaning that the direction labels on the ADLs convey information that keeps “the origin of the universe” in view. For example, the 4-d Forward direction is reference to the direction away from the origin of the universe—the direction in which a Lumeyne moves at the Big Bang—and the 5-d Backward direction is a reference to the 5-d direction in which a Gravityne acts-on a Lumeyne. BUT IF THERE IS ANY CONFUSION CAUSED BY MY “UNIVERSE-CENTRIC” ABSOLUTE DIRECTION LABELS, then to simplify, substitute “Absolute Forward direction” and “Absolute Backward direction” for my labels, and keep in mind that the label choices are not going to change any analysis results, because again, the ADLs in each dimension are Absolutely Coincident with each other in a “vertical” way.)
When an UPSIDE-UP, or “UU,” TM (shown on the left in the photo/diagram) is in the ADL Backbone Orientation, then the particle top would be pointing toward “N” on the TM PARTICLE COMPASS.
So looking-at the TM shown on the left in the photo/diagram, we see that Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching is causing the UU TM to apply its particle-force, Ft, from the particle top in a certain 3-d Forward direction (310 degrees) on the compass.
When an UPSIDE-DOWN, or “UD,” TM (shown on the right in the photo/diagram) is in the ADL Backbone Orientation, then the particle top would be pointing toward “S” on the TM PARTICLE COMPASS.
So looking-at the TM shown on the right in the photo/diagram, we see that Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching is causing the UD TM to apply its particle-force, Ft, from the particle top in a certain 3-d Forward direction (130 degrees) on the compass.
But the only thing that would appear inside of the universe would be the “front office” view of an LL’s “force scene” in its own Snowman of God.
And we know that there are only two possible “force scenes” that any LL can have: (1) the force scene of the Lumeyne in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram (see Article 6, STEP 10), if the TM and the LL are UD, OR (2) the force scene of the Lumeyne in the THE BIG BANG diagram (see Article 6, STEP 18), if the TM and the LL are UU. And of course the LL will be moving in response to the orientation of the TM SPHERICAL COMPASS, as determined by Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching, if any.
So if we examined the LLs in the same Snowmen as the TMs in the exemplary photo/diagram of the two TM PARTICLE COMPASSES, above, then we would see the UU LL applying its particle-force, FfSet, along the LADL in the same 3-d Forward direction (130 degrees) in which the TM is applying Ft, and we would see the UD LL applying its particle-force, FfSet, along the LADL in the same 3-d Forward direction (310 degrees) in which the TM is applying Ft.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 2!
TEST-DRIVE 3:
Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs to move at different points along the same line of non-zero slope, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line.
TEST-DRIVE 3 RESULTS:
It would be similar to playing TETRIS! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BLM1naCfME
FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to put the LLs on a HEAD-ON COLLISION COURSE by orienting the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES to *different degrees 180-degrees apart* (opposite 3-d directions) along the line defined by the LADLs (with the 3-d UP direction on one LADL overlapping and Absolutely Coincident with the 3-d DOWN direction on the other LADL.)
So the force scene is always going to be one TM/LL UU and one TM/LL UD!
Then if one of the TMs was turned-around 180 degrees, the result would be ONE LL FOLLOWING THE OTHER ALONG THE SAME LINE of non-zero slope, with both LLs being UU or both LLs being UD.
And if both TMs were turned-around 180 degrees, the result would be THE LLs MOVING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SAME LINE of non-zero slope.
Also see the photo illustrations in TEST-DRIVE 2.
QUESTION: Is it possible to get two UU LLs or two UD LLs head-to-head on a line of non-zero slope?
ANSWER: No. This is because to be head-to-head means that the LLs are moving toward the same point, and all lines of non-zero slope in 3-d that meet at the same 3-d point are either IN-FRONT-OF THE POINT *or* they are BEHIND THE POINT, and no two LLs can occupy the same position (the same point), ergo, given two LLs on a line of non-zero slope, one LL will always be UU and one LL will always be UD when they are both heading toward the same point.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 3!
TEST-DRIVE 4:
Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs to move at different points along the same zero-slope line, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line.
TEST-DRIVE 4 RESULTS:
It would be similar to playing TETRIS!
PART A. Assume that it’s fine if one LL ends-up UU and the other LL ends-up UD along the zero-slope line. If it’s necessary for both LLs to end-up UU or both LLs to end-up UD, then skip to PART B, below.
PART A FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
PART A SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Forward-most LL into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation.
PART A THIRD STEP, Father Time would tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Backward-most LL into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation.
PART A FOURTH STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs, until both LLs were positioned along the same ZERO-SLOPE LINE.
PART A FIFTH STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to put the LLs on a HEAD-ON COLLISION COURSE by orienting the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES to *different degrees 180-degrees apart* (opposite 3-d directions) along the line defined by the LADLs (with the 3-d UP direction on one LADL overlapping and Absolutely Coincident with the 3-d DOWN direction on the other LADL), so that they could apply forces to each other.
The LLs will end-up facing each other along the same zero-slope line.
So now if one of the LLs was turned-around 180 degrees, then the result would be ONE LL FOLLOWING THE OTHER along the same zero-slope line.
And if both LLs were turned-around 180 degrees, then the result would be THE LLs MOVING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SAME ZERO-SLOPE LINE.
PART B. Assume that both LLs need to end-up UU or both LLs need to end-up UD along the same zero-slope line.
PART B FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
PART B SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to tip the TMs in the same Snowmen as the LLs into either (a) the UD ADL Backbone Orientation OR (b) the UU ADL Backbone Orientation.
If Father Time selected (a) and tipped the TMs into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, then the LLs would simultaneously tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation.
If Father Time selected (b) and tipped the TMs into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, then the LLs would simultaneously tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation.
PART B THIRD STEP, when the leading LL reached the desired zero-slope line, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching of the TM in the same Snowman to cause the leading LL to move in either direction along the desired line—perhaps changing direction along the line periodically—which would be like causing the leading LL to *wait* for the following LL to catch-up.
PART B FOURTH STEP, when the following LL reached the desired zero-slope line, then Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching of the TMs to orient the LLs head-to-head along the line, and they would automatically move toward each other.
Optionally, 3-d Mindful Stretching could be continued, turning both TMs around 180 degrees, to get the LLs into a tail-to-tail position.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 4!
TEST-DRIVE 5:
Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, one-on-top-of-the-other, to move at different points along the same line, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line.
TEST-DRIVE 5 RESULTS:
No. Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in 3-d anymore!
The Upside Down in “Stranger Things” is not a science-fiction concept!
After the Lumeyne in a given Snowman of God experiences a Big Bang event, then the TM is NOT IN THE SAME PLACE as the Lumeyne anymore (the Lumeyne is now a “Loose Lumeyne,” or LL.)
But the higher dimensions can reach-out and touch LLs wherever they are, and that’s how OMNIPRESENCE AND OMNIPOTENCE works.
For the purpose of TEST-DRIVE 5, however, we just have to REMEMBER that it always was impossible for any pre-Big-Bang Lumeyne in any Snowman of God to “visit” a different Lumeyne in a different Snowman of God, because every particle in every Snowman of God lives-along the same ADL Backbone, and the ADL Backbone has a UNIQUE POSITION that is relative-to the COM of the 6th dimension.
So therefore when an LL is in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, it would be impossible for the LL’s LADL, which is relative-to the ADL Backbone of its own Snowman, to become Absolutely Coincident with any other ADL Backbone—or any other LADL!—except-for the ADL of its own Snowman.
This means that no two LLs can ever have Absolutely Coincident LADLs in the 3-d Backbone Orientation.
QUESTION: Can we at least say that when a lone LL is in the 3-d Backbone Orientation (which happens when Father Time is not doing any 3-d Mindful Stretching of the TM), then the LADL *must be* IN-BETWEEN TWO ADL Backbones if it is not bang-on its own Snowman’s ADL Backbone?
ANSWER: Yes, we can say that for certain!
Even more specifically, we can say that there is *an offset less than one particle-width* (less than one 3-d Forward degree) between LADLs when two LLs are in the 3-d Backbone Orientation one-on-top-of-the-other!
This is because when an LL is being told by the TM to “track” with the ADL Backbone, then there is always going to be a new ADL Backbone at the “width” of one Lumeyne, so therefore the LADLs of two LLs that are positioned one-on-top-of-the-other IN-BETWEEN the same two ADL Backbones will always be separated by GREATER THAN ZERO BUT LESS THAN ONE ATOMIC 3-d FORWARD DEGREE.
In that situation, their LADLs will be parallel, each at some *offset* from the “midline” of the other LL—let’s call it an “LL LADL Offset,” or “LLOff”—so even if the LADLs are both within the same 3-d degree, they aren’t Absolutely Coincident, they are what we call Relatively Coincident.
Boom!
We have PROVEN that an LADL is 100% in 3-d!
QUESTION: Does that mean an LL is in 3-d?
ANSWER: No. The LL’s mass cannot leave 4-d, because it has Eternal 4-d existence, and to conclude otherwise is to negate a part of God.
Houston, we’ve had a mental problem.
We know that every atom must be comprised-of LLs, so therefore every atom must also be 100% in 3-d.
And even the center-of-mass, or COM (the Positionally Absolute Part), of an atom must be in 3-d!
But the LLs have to stay in 4-d.
That’s OK, we just have to figure-out how that is possible.
So let’s do that specific figuring in a future article, and pause here to review some general information we have deduced about matter.
Here RECALL from Article 3 that objects comprised-of particles (for example, atoms) can be generically referred-to as “objects-of-interest,” or OOIs.
All OOIs have their own center-of-mass, or COM, which is the Backward-most part of the OOI, and the rest of the OOI is positionally RELATIVE-TO the COM because the COM is BLOCKING THE BACKWARD PATH of the rest of the OOI.
The COM of an OOI moves along an Absolute Direction Line—called an OADL—which is analogous to an LL’s LADL, with the OADL being determined in an as-yet unknown manner based-on the constituent LADLs of the LLs comprising the OOI.
QUESTION: If atoms are in 3-d, then how does 4-d light remain behind an atom?
ANSWER: Again, the LLs must remain in 4-d somehow. And we already know that the 4-d COM Segment of every LL remains in the Snowman of God, and the LL remains connected to the 4-d COM Segment via an integral COM Tongue (see Article 6, STEP 13, Feature (i)).
QUESTION: Ummm yeah but as noted, the 4-d COM Tongue is integral with the 4-d COM Segment *and* the LL particle bottom—the 4-d COM Tongue acts-like a bridge between the 4-d COM Segment in the Snowman of God and the LL—so why don’t we see the 4-d COM Tongues in 3-d?
ANSWER: The reason we don’t see the 4-d COM Tongues inside of the universe is because they’re in 4-d, with the LLs.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 5!
TEST-DRIVE 6.
Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, one-on-top-of-the-other, to move along RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT LADLs, as described in TEST-DRIVE 5, which means that the two LLs would apply forces to each others’ bodies at the LLOff instead of at the midline.
TEST-DRIVE 6 RESULTS:
It would be similar to playing TETRIS!
INITIALLY, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
PART A.
If the LLs were not presently lying along the same zero-slope line, then Father Time would proceed to PART B.
If the LLs were presently lying along the same zero-slope line, then Father Time would follow the steps of PART A before proceeding to PART B.
PART A FIRST STEP, regarding the LL that would end-up as the Forward-most LL, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to tip the TM in the same Snowman into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A THIRD STEP.)
PART A SECOND STEP, regarding the LL that would end-up as the Backward-most LL, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to tip the TM in the same Snowman into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST DRIVE 4, PART A SECOND STEP.)
PART A THIRD STEP, the LLs would automatically move away from each other by traveling in the 3-d UP direction and the 3-d DOWN direction, respectively, along their own LADLs, until the desired zero-slope line was lying somewhere in-between them.
PART A FOURTH STEP, Father Time would proceed to PART B.
PART B.
PART B FIRST STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Forward-most LL into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A SECOND STEP.)
PART B SECOND STEP, Father Time would tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Backward-most LL into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A THIRD STEP.)
PART B THIRD STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs.
PART B FOURTH STEP, *before* the LLs became aligned along the same zero-slope line, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to cause the LLs to HEAD TOWARD EACH OTHER ALONG PARALLEL LINES OF ZERO-SLOPE (defined by their LADLs) in *different directions 180 degrees apart* (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A FIFTH STEP.)
PART B FIFTH STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another until both LLs were positioned in-between the same two ADL Backbones.
PART B SIXTH STEP, Father Time would cease 3-d Mindful Stretching.
This would cause the TM in the same Snowman as the Forward-most LL to return to the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, and the LL would simultaneously tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see PART B FIRST STEP.)
Likewise, the TM in the same Snowman as the Backward-most LL would return to the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, and the LL would simultaneously tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see PART B SECOND STEP.)
The LLs will end-up one-on-top-of-the-other along RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT lines, which will be parallel, with the LLOff between the LADLs.
PART B SEVENTH STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs, separated by the LLOff distance.
NOTE that it would be possible to get ONE OF THE LLs TO FOLLOW THE OTHER in the 3-d Backbone Orientation by turning one TM around 180 degrees after PART B SIXTH STEP.
ALSO NOTE that it would be possible to get two LLs to MOVE AWAY FROM EACH OTHER in the 3-d Backbone Orientation by turning both TMs around 180 degrees after PART B SIXTH STEP.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 6!
TEST-DRIVE 7:
The “driving” is done, and now we’ve got to answer some questions about performance.
QUESTION: When an LL’s LADL is tilted in a 3-d direction on the LL PARTICLE COMPASS, do the FORCES of (1) FfSet and (2) the wave-energy that’s being emitted through the open door in the 4-d Forward direction along the ADL turn-into 3-d forces?
ANSWER: No. The force-applying mass of FfSet remains in 4-d, and the wave-energy that’s being emitted in the 4-d Forward direction remains in 4-d.
QUESTION: But what about an LL’s rotational force of Fmass(L)? Wouldn’t the physical forces that LLs applied to each other along 3-d lines have to change the magnitude and direction of Fmass(L)?
ANSWER: #1, LLs cannot apply forces directly to each other, because LL are not relative-to each other, and #2, THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF FMASS(L) IS AN ETERNAL CONSTANT OF AN LL’S *EXISTENCE* IN THE 4-d LIGHT PART OF GOD, and higher-dimensions cannot be acted-on by lower-dimension physical forces.
An LL cannot be ACTED-ON by physical force *except* by a higher dimension particle, i.e., a 5-d Gravityne or a 6-d Timeyne in the same Snowman of God. And as we saw in Article 6, THE MAGNITUDE OF ALL HIGHER-DIMENSION PHYSICAL FORCES IN A SNOWMAN OF GOD IS CONSTANT, and the only variable physical force is THE DIRECTION OF Ft, which can either be applied in the 5-d Backward direction (if the TM is tipped UD) or in the 4-d Forward direction (if the TM is tipped UU.) That’s the beauty of Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching! It doesn’t change Fmass(T)!
But surely external physical forces applied to an LADL along 3-d lines can change an LL’s experience of how the rotational force of Fmass(L) is BALANCED around the rotation axis, which is the ADL, to which the LADL is relative. Then the LL has to cause the LADL to TILT to a position where the LL experiences BALANCED rotational force of Fmass(L), with the tilting being automatic and necessary so that the Natural particle-force and the Natural direction of rotation remain constant.
QUESTION: But if BOTH (1) the external physical forces that are applied to LADLs and (2) Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching of TMs can change how an LL experiences the BALANCE of Fmass(L) around the rotation axis, and thereby change the TILT of the LADL, then ARE OTHER LLs AND TMs COMPETING WITH EACH OTHER TO CONTROL THE TILT OF ANY GIVEN LL’s LADL (i.e., to control the 3-d Forward direction in which the LADL is pointing)?
ANSWER: No, because Father Time is controlling all the TMs of all the LLs.
In joy,
Frank