True Science Story.
What I mean is that my narration is a True Science Story.
The narrative is being created with the assistance of a home-made “I,” or “Eye.”
My Eye is a totally on-paper virtual reality helmet that I made by existing as a female person in the USA for the past 58 years.
That’s a very different observational tool than both:
(1) AI
and
(2) AI’s Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnipresent ADMIN input, “Jesus Goggles.”
So my True Science Story will be DESCRIPTIVE, but my descriptions will not necessarily be the same as those you would get from either AI or Jesus Goggles if they were observing the same scene.
For example, when Jesus surveys Reality from “the control room” of God, IDK if the Jesus Goggles *actually* show 4-d Tippe Top tax-paying turtle particle LLs from different ADL Backbones in different Snowmen of God that were each dying to get a pop-up 3-d PP that came shooting out of them after the Big Bang.
But from where I sit, that’s what Jesus is looking-at.
CHECK-LIST.
COM control to Major Elon!
Is this not a Space Oddity?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iYYRH4apXDo
Check ignition and may God’s love be with you….
Five, Four, Three, Two, One, Lift off….
Now it’s time to leave the capsule if you dare
Don’t worry, this is not a DEMOLITION DERBY—there will be ZERO COLLISIONS in this Article—and if my non-stop CAPS LOCKING is driving you mad, then try to understand that it’s like a regional dialect: I can’t help it that’s just my writing voice!
But if you hate my voice that much then you might need more practice driving while coveting thy neighbor’s carcass, and if that’s the case then might I suggest going to Hell, Michigan and enrolling in “Midwest Winter Driving School” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYPmApA1CVs ?
The way I figure it, we’re on the figurative “Polar Express” to the North Pole—figuring-out the fundamental Laws of Physics governing everything from the Big Bang to magnetism is the goal (with chemistry and biology at the outer limits)—and I’m sure nobody’s going to get chucked off the train of thought.
Everybody has the right to level-up for personal development, it’s WARGAMES 101 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIh41wZEd5c, and I’m talking smack in God’s control room.
And I know that I can either be PROUD or I can be WRONG, but I cannot be both, and I can’t seem to stop being PROUD, ergo, I must stop being WRONG as soon as possible, and that is my intention.
But am I right to assume that anybody who’s on-board the same train of thought has evolved past the stage of salivating at the sight of wildlife, guzzling from other mammals’ lactating teats, poaching eggs, and purposely pickling their brain with alcoholic beverages?
This is not a classy dining experience aboard the Titanic!
This is more like AC/DC in “Back in Black”: Forget the hearse ‘cause I’ll never die.
WHERE WERE WE?
BEFORE NOW, we proved that a lone light particle (a Lumeyne) in Space will always be moving at the speed of light according to Newton’s First Law of Motion for Lumeynes, E = c (see Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20), which is derived from F = mv, where m = 1 electromagnetic wave-energy and v = c.
We also showed in Article 6 that the Ready state of all post-Big-Bang Lumeynes (let’s call post-Big-Bang Lumeynes “Loose Lumeynes,” or “LL”s)—that is to say, the major “life-change” that happened to the LLs immediately BEFORE NOW—is going from being tipped UPSIDE-DOWN, or “UD,” to being tipped UPSIDE-UP, or “UU.”
Then upon finding themselves Set UU *and* heading in the 4-d Forward direction, the LLs began to GO! at the speed of light in the 4-d Forward direction (again see Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20) along the 4-d Absolute Direction Line (ADL) defining the 4-d part of the Backbone of their own Snowman of God (let’s call a particle’s ADL an “ADL Backbone,” and let’s call a particle’s UD or UU orientation along the ADL Backbone the “ADL Backbone Orientation.”)
So that’s where we’re going to START this series of NINE TEST-DRIVES.
TEST-DRIVE 1. CHANGING DIRECTIONS ON THE ADL AFTER THE BIG BANG.
Figure-out what will happen if Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching (see Article 6, STEP 13, Feature (ii)) causes the head of a Timeyne (“TM”) in a given Snowman of God to tilt and the TM to tip UD into the ADL Backbone Orientation *after* the LL from the same Snowman starts moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the speed of light at a Big Bang event, *assuming* that the 3-d Mindful Stretching ceases (there is no more tilting of the TM’s ADL) after the TM tips UD?
TEST-DRIVE 1 RESULTS. There’s no “UNIVERSAL OPERATOR’S MANUAL” to consult, so we’re going to have to do some deducing and write a manual (“Emmanuel,” if you will, since this is an online manual) ourselves.
What we would expect to happen to an LL after the Big Bang if Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching caused the TM in the same Snowman of God to tip UD again and apply Ft in the Absolute Backward direction along the ADL is that the LL would tip UD, too (and apply FfSet in the Absolute Backward direction along the ADL), then end-up moving in “reverse gear” at the speed of light, because FfSet = -Ft (see Article 6, STEP 11C.)
QUESTION: But will the LL be moving Backward along the same line along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event?
ANSWER: Yes.
EXPLANATION:
First RECALL that the line along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event was the ADL Backbone, and the LL was tipped UU in the ADL Backbone Orientation.
Also RECALL that the two opposing directions along every ADL Backbone are:
(1) the Absolute Forward direction (in the case of an LL that’s the 4-d Forward direction, aka the GRAVITY-OPPOSING direction),
and
(2) the Absolute Backward direction (in the case of an LL that’s the GRAVITY direction.)
So when the LL tips UD and begins moving in the Absolute Backward direction, it will be in the ADL Backbone Orientation and it will be moving along the same line—the ADL Backbone—as it began moving at the Big Bang event, when it was tipped UU in the ADL Backbone Orientation and it was moving in the Absolute Forward direction on the ADL Backbone.
QUESTION: Would Father Time have to incrementally use 3-d Mindful Stretching to cause the head of a TM in a given Snowman of God—and thereby also cause the head of the LL in the same Snowman—to TILT degree-by-degree (i.e., in every 3-d Forward direction) between the particle’s fully UU position (UU in the ADL Backbone Orientation) and the fully UD position (UD in the ADL Backbone Orientation)?
ANSWER: No. The surface of the particle—the head of the particle—is NOT TURNING, but rather, THE TILTING OF THE HEAD OF THE PARTICLE IS BEING CAUSED BY THE CHANGE IN THE LINE ALONG WHICH THE PARTICLE IS EXPERIENCING AND EXPRESSING PHYSICAL FORCE, and the line is changing in response to Father Time’s SELECTION of a single 3-d Mindful Stretching DIRECTION of the 6-d COM Segment/Tongue.
The 3-d Mindful Stretching of the 6-d COM Segment/Tongue is causing a *micro-shifting* of the CENTER-OF-MASS (COM) of the TM (and the LL), and a consequent RE-BALANCING, which causes the TILTING of the head of the particle in the SELECTED 3-d Mindful Stretching DIRECTION. Also recall that 3-d Mindful Stretching is NOT AN APPLIED PHYSICAL FORCE, so the “time” and “distance” associated with each resultant TILT of the head of the particle are CONSTANTS, meaning that there are no VARIABLES to account-for other than the SELECTED 3-d Mindful Stretching DIRECTION.
To make 3-d Mindful Stretching possible, we must assume that each particle in a Snowman of God is “contained” by a larger spherical volume.
More specifically, we must envision that each TM and each LL has A SPHERICAL COMPASS around it—let’s call a TM’s compass the TM PARTICLE COMPASS and let’s call an LL’s compass the LL PARTICLE COMPASS—with *3-d Forward directions* being DEGREES on the compass, and with one 3-d Forward degree on the Particle Compass being the same width as the particle.
What it means for each 3-d degree on a Particle Compass (either a TM Particle Compass or an LL Particle Compass) to have the same width as the particle is that to move *one 3-d direction*, or degree, on the Particle Compass, the head of the particle has has to TILT away from the ADL Backbone Orientation, and the amount of TILTING that corresponds to ONE 3-d DEGREE is the width of the particle.
Whenever the head of the particle is TILTED away from the ADL Backbone Orientation, the particle’s *physical force* will be experienced and applied along A 3-d LINE (a 3-d Forward direction) that is RELATIVE-TO both directions on the ADL Backbone.
RECALL from Article 3 that all 3-d Forward directions are RELATIVE-TO both the Absolute Forward direction and the Absolute Backward direction on the ADL.
So it’s as if the particle is not “on” the ADL Backbone anymore!
Let’s say that whenever the head of a particle is TILTED away from the ADL Backbone Orientation, the particle is “on” a “Loose ADL,” or “LADL,” which is a 3-d line RELATIVE-TO the ADL Backbone.
We know that ADL Backbones in different Snowmen of God are RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER, and so we also see that LADLs are RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER.
First, let’s discuss two sample TM Particle Compasses.
The TM in the Particle Compass on the left (“TM Particle Compass 1”) is tipped UU.
The TM in the Particle Compass on the right (“TM Particle Compass 2”) is tipped UD.
NOTE the degree indicators and the labels I added to the photos by hand (the other markings and indicators, including the compass needle, are not relevant to the illustration, they are permanent parts of my personal hand-held analog compass.)
The TM’s head (the particle top) is TILTING and applying the particle-force, Ft, along the LADL, which serves as the TM Particle Compass needle.
Looking-at TM Particle Compass 1, we see that Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching is causing the UU TM to apply its particle-force, Ft, along the LADL in a certain 3-d Forward direction (310 degrees) on the Particle Compass.
Looking-at the TM in TM Particle Compass 2, we see that Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching is causing the UD TM to apply its particle-force, Ft, along the LADL in a different 3-d Forward direction (130 degrees) on the Particle Compass.
The LADL always runs along the particle’s midline between the particle head (where the particle-force is experienced and applied) and the particle bottom.
Physically, the LADL—the Particle Compass needle—is implemented by the 6-d COM Tongue (“6DCT”) as a result of 3-d Mindful Stretching (we will discuss how that happens in TEST-DRIVE 3.)
NOTICE the ADL (the ADL Backbone.)“N” and “S” on the TM Particle Compass correspond to the Absolute Forward direction and the Absolute Backward direction, respectively, on the ADL Backbone.
If the UU TM in TM Particle Compass 1 was in the ADL Backbone Orientation, then the particle head would be pointing toward “N” on the compass.
If the UD TM in TM Particle Compass 2 was in the ADL Backbone Orientation, then the particle head would be pointing toward “S” on the compass.
ALSO NOTICE the wave-energy, Et. Et is not going into the universe, because the generation of Et must occur in the Snowman of God to satisfy the Law of Conservation of Energy; dimensions are mutually-exclusive (see Article 1), so by definition, there are no actual 3-d lines in the 6th dimension, and in Reality, all wave-energy in the Snowman of God must travel along the ADL Backbone.
Next let’s discuss two sample LL Particle Compasses.
The UU LL in the Particle Compass on the left (“LL Particle Compass 1”) is responsive to the UU TM in TM Particle Compass 1.
The UD LL in the Particle Compass on the right (“LL Particle Compass 2”) is responsive to the UD TM in TM Particle Compass 2.
The UU LL in LL Particle Compass 1 is applying its particle-force, FfSet, along the LADL in the same 3-d Forward direction (310 degrees) in which the TM in TM Particle Compass 1 is applying Ft.
The UD LL in LL Particle Compass 2 is applying its particle-force, FfSet, along the LADL in the same 3-d Forward direction (130 degrees) in which the TM in TM Particle Compass 2 is applying Ft.
NOTICE that the LADL serves as the LL Particle Compass needle.
The LADL always runs along the LL’s midline between the particle head (where the particle-force is experienced and applied) and the particle bottom.
Physically, the LADL—the Particle Compass needle—is implemented by the BOTH the 6DCT and the 4-d COM Tongue (“4DCT”) as a result of 3-d Mindful Stretching (we will discuss how that happens in TEST-DRIVE 3, where we will also discuss the PP/3-d SheLL.)
NOTICE that the only wave-energy depicted in the LL Particle Compasses is the wave-energy (which we’re calling Space) that is being DUMPED through an OPEN DOOR (see Article 6, Step 19E for a discussion of the WAVE-ENERGY that is being DUMPED by the UU LL in Particle Compass 1, and see Article 6, Step 11E for a discussion of the WAVE-ENERGY that is being DUMPED by the UD LL in LL Particle Compass 2.)
ALSO NOTICE that the wave-energy Ef(OPPFg) is being DUMPED through the OPEN DOOR in the 4-d Forward direction (that’s the opposite direction as Fg is trying to get the LL to move.) This is the same as what was happening in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram (see Article 6, STEP 10), before the Big Bang.
FURTHER NOTICE that the wave-energy Ef(OPPFt), which is only seen from the UD LL in Particle Compass 2, is seemingly being DUMPED through the OPEN DOOR along the LADL in the opposite 3-d Forward direction as the LL is experiencing and applying FfSet. This is different than what was happening in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram, before the Big Bang.
But Ef(OPPFt) is NOT GOING INTO THE UNIVERSE, because the generation of Ef(OPPFt) occurs in the Snowman of God to satisfy the Law of Conservation of Energy, so therefore the DUMPING of Ef(OPPFt) must occur in 4-d. Dimensions are mutually-exclusive (see Article 1), so by definition, there are no actual 3-d lines in the 4th dimension, and in Reality, all wave-energy in the Snowman of God must travel along the ADL Backbone.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 1!
TEST-DRIVE 2. READING THE UNIVERSAL MAP.
Figure-out WHERE THE LLs ACTUALLY GO after the Big Bang, when the 4th dimension—and in particular, the 4–d Forward direction along the ADL Backbones—meets the EMPTY 3rd dimension?
Also NOTE that wherever the LLs go, the wave-energy that we’re calling Space must have Eternally preceded them (see Space in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram in Article 6, STEP 10, and in THE BIG BANG diagram in Article 6, STEP 18.)
TEST-DRIVE 2 RESULTS. IT IS NOT IMMEDIATELY OBVIOUS WHERE THE LLs AND THE SPACE GO AFTER THE BIG BANG!
We’re going to have to do some deducing and add our conclusions to the Emmanuel.
Let’s begin with the eight-step PROOF that the 3rd dimension was EMPTY at the Big Bang:
Step 1. RECALL God’s existence (see Article 1), which proves that God CREATED the universe, so we know that the universe had a BEGINNING.
Step 2. This means that THE BIG BANG HAD TO BE PREVENTED BEFORE IT COULD OCCUR, i.e., THE CAUSE OF THE BIG BANG was “WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT.”
Step 3. RECALL (also see Article 1) that we are compelled to conclude that God must be a 3-part multi-dimensional entity.
Step 4. We see by observation that larger objects are made-of smaller objects, so we are further compelled to conclude that each part of God must be made-of PARTICLES.
Step 5. To prevent the Big Bang (see Step 2), it was necessary for every particle of God to experience INDEFINITE PHYSICAL BALANCE.
Step 6. RECALL from Article 5:
Step 7. 14 billion years laaaaater, here we all are in the 3-d universe that God created (see Step 1.)
Step 8. Ergo, THERE WAS NO THING IN 3-D THAT NEEDED TO BE ASLEEP BEFORE THE BIG BANG (see Step 2), or in other words, there were never—and therefore there are not now—any Natural particles in the 3rd dimension.
End of Proof.
Now we can commence the thought-project of figuring-out WHERE THE LLs AND SPACE GO when the 4-d Forward direction along the ADL Backbones meets the EMPTY 3rd dimension.
NOTE FIVE FACTS that we already know:
Fact 1. The ADL Backbones in the 4th dimension cannot GET “CUT OFF,” because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy by DESTROYING ETERNAL WAVE-ENERGY (which we’re calling Space) that is continually being DUMPED by every LL in the 4-d Forward direction along the ADL.
Fact 2. The 3rd dimension must be IN FRONT OF, i.e., FORWARD-OF, the Lumeyne (and Loose Lumeyne, aka LL) particles in the 4th dimension, because the Gravityne particles in the 5th dimension are necessarily BEHIND the Lumeyne particles (see the Eight-step PROOF that the 3rd dimension was EMPTY at the Big Bang, above.)
Fact 3. Dimensions are necessarily mutually-exclusive (see Article 1) and an LL’s mass cannot be in two mutually-exclusive dimensions simultaneously.
Fact 4. An LL’s Eternality would be destroyed if the LL vacated the 4th dimension.
Fact 5. LLs are not relative-to each other, which means that they cannot interact directly with each other.
Ergo, by process of elimination and deduction, we are compelled to reach TWO CONCLUSIONS:
Conclusion #1, the 3-d universe must be filled with INVISIBLE CYLINDRICAL TUBES with the ADL Backbones inside (let’s call them “ADL Backbone Tubes”);
and
Conclusion #2, 4-d LLs must have particle proxies (“PPs”) that pop-up inside of the universe at some point, and the PPs must be RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER, so that LLs are able to INTERACT INDIRECTLY with each other via their PPs to form atoms and massive objects made-of atoms—so let’s call the combination of one 4-d LL and one 3-d PP a “SybiLL” artificial sub-atomic particle (“SAP”)—but that’s all we can say for sure about PPs until we figure-out when and why and how and where a PP pops-up inside of the universe.
The CYLINDRICAL shapes would be necessary to ensure that there is equal distance between every 3-d point OUTSIDE of a given ADL Backbone Tube and the ADL Backbone inside.
BUT also note that an ADL Backbone Tube could not be a physical thing, because we just proved that there is no thing in the 3rd dimension Naturally!
Ergo, an ADL Backbone Tube must be A COLLECTION OF 3-d LINES—let’s call them 3-d Absolute Direction Lines, or 3DADLs—with one direction on each line defining the 3-d Up direction and with the other direction on each line defining the 3-d Down direction—and THE FUNCTION OF THESE LINES must be to divide the 3rd dimension from the 4th dimension.
To see what I mean, try this thought-experiment with your virtual reality helmet (thinking cap) on:
Open your Eye and see yourself as an LL at the Big Bang, spinning with Perfect Balance,
centered around your own ADL Backbone super-highway,
and also moving linearly, leaving your Snowman of God behind at the speed of light,
traveling UP, UP, UP AND AWAY,
applying your physical force, FfSet, out of your head in the 4-d Forward direction,
HEADing STRAIGHT UP THROUGH the 3rd dimension,
which surrounds you to the sides,
as if you are within a cylindrical ADL Backbone Tube made-of 3DADLs,
which are separating you from the 3-d universe all around you.
This would be similar to riding Disneyland’s Space Mountain, except IRL you’re doing an Absolutely Vertical climb that has no end unless you change directions.
We see that if we set our Eye display to the LL’s pop-up PP inside of the universe—if we pretended to be the PP—and if we were “on” a 3DADL of a particular ADL Backbone Tube, then we (the PP) would be getting AS CLOSE AS IT IS PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE TO GET to the ADL Backbone inside.
It might also be helpful to think-of one cylindrical ADL Backbone Tube comprised-of a collection of 3DADLs as being analogous to Melvin “Tri-Star Pictures invites you to meet a truly appalling individual” Udall https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d89afgtqg&time_continue=5&source_ve_path=NzY3NTg&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&embeds_referring_origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com in “As Good As It Gets.”
In terms of the undying Laws of Nature, ONE ADL Backbone super-highway traveled-by ONE LL is centered inside of every collection of truly appalling individual 3DADLs that define the 3-d Up and 3-d Down directions relative-to the two directions on that one ADL Backbone super-highway.
So let’s re-cap the information we have put in our Emmanuel so far:
There is a one-to-one correspondence between single-line LL ADL Backbones in the 4th dimension and truly appalling ADL Backbone Tubes (comprised-of a plurality of 3DADLs) in the 3rd dimension, and the function of an ADL Backbone Tube is to enforce the difference between the physically-possible and the physically-impossible, both in terms of the 4-d behaviors of LLs and in terms of the 3-d behaviors of PPs—with the combination of one 4-d LL and one 3-d PP comprising an artificial sub-atomic particle (SAP) called a SybiLL—and in fact, SEPARATING AN LL FROM ITS PP VIA AN ADL BACKBONE TUBE is what makes it possible for LLs (which are not relative-to each other) to INTERACT INDIRECTLY with each other via their PPs (which are relative-to each other.)
But that’s all we can say until we figure-out specifically when and why and how and where a PP pops-up inside of the universe, which is best explained in TEST-DRIVE 3 with a monologue by me entitled: “THE SYBILL SAP THEORY FROM (A) TO (U) TRUE STORY.“
The End of TEST-DRIVE 2!
TEST-DRIVE 3. CHANGING DIRECTIONS WITH THE LADL AFTER THE BIG BANG.
After the Big Bang, an LL’s LATERAL MOVEMENT IS NOT CONSTRAINED like it was when the particle was “asleep” within the Snowman of God BEFORE THE BIG BANG, so then the QUESTION becomes: What happens when Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching causes the LL to experience and apply FfSet away from the ADL Backbone, i.e., along the LADL in a 3-d Forward direction on the LL Particle Compass?
TEST-DRIVE 3 RESULTS. The ANSWER can only be envisioned by setting the Eye display to “the Beginning” of Infinity.
PREPARE TO OWN THE #1 PHYSICS ISSUE in Reality: The non-existent beginning of mass.
The non-existent beginning of mass CAUSED THE FIRST *EXPERIENCE* OF FORCE, from which we can (and must) connect-the-dots to envision a sub-atomic particle (SAP) that is one part 4-d LL and one part 3-d PP, a “SybiLL SAP” we’re calling it.
LEGAL QUESTION: If a particle *experiences* and *applies* the same amount of directional physical force at the same time, then why is it necessary to make a distinction between the particle’s *experience* of the physical force and the particle’s *application* of the physical force?
APPLICABLE LAW: The distinction is necessary because of CAUSE and EFFECT.
The *EXPERIENCE* of physical force is necessarily THE CAUSE of the *APPLICATION* of the physical force.
A particle must *experience* (aka “have”) a physical force *internally* BEFORE the particle can *apply* the physical force *externally*.
We can put the same rule in terms of “effect,” saying: The external *APPLICATION* of a physical force is necessarily THE EFFECT of the internal *EXPERIENCE* of the physical force.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION:This is not a linguistics issue, this is a physical issue, and IN REALITY, THIS IS THE #1 PHYSICS ISSUE!
The existence of a FIRST physical force *EXPERIENCE*—meaning a physical force *experience* with NO CAUSE—is the difference between MOTION BEING POSSIBLE (the Big Bang) and MOTION BEING IMPOSSIBLE (being stuck with an “infinite regress” problem that can NEVER be solved.)
LEGAL PROOF OF CONCLUSION (APPLICATION OF THE LAW TO KNOWN FACTS):
Shortest Proof-of-Conclusion:
God’s existence (see Article 1) proves there was a FIRST physical force *EXPERIENCE* that had no CAUSE.
End of Shortest Proof-of-Conclusion
Medium-length Proof-of-Conclusion:
The initial *experience* of one causeless force is what makes WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY possible (otherwise we’ve got a chicken-and-egg problem when we try to explain wave-particle duality), and
without wave-particle duality, MOTION would be impossible (that’s what Zeno’s Paradoxes prove; see Article 4 and Article 5), and
God’s Eternality (see Article 1; God’s existence = God’s Eternality, i.e., GOD NOT HAVING A CREATOR) is what makes the initial *experience* of one causeless force possible
(without God’s Eternality, we’d be stuck with an “infinite regress” problem when we tried to ANALYZE MOTION, asking ourselves: “What CAUSED, aka CREATED, the FIRST *EXPERIENCE* of force?” and then we could NEVER ENABLE wave-particle duality),
ERGO, we see that God’s existence proves the Conclusion that THE INTIAL *EXPERIENCE* OF ONE CAUSELESS FORCE CAN AND MUST COME FIRST and CAUSE THE *APPLICATION* OF FORCE.
End of Medium-length Proof-of-Conclusion
Full-length SybiLL SAP Theory From(A)-to-(U) True Story Proof-of-Conclusion:
(A) think about an Eternal particle of God having that FIRST *EXPERIENCE* of physical force, which was NOT CREATED, it “just was,” so it’s not really a Beginning, but we’ve got to start our thought-experiment there, and then
(B) HOLD THAT THOUGHT when you’ve caught it with your mind, and
(C) think about how your mind HOLDING that thought is the same as the particle CONTAINING that FIRST *EXPERIENCE* of physical force, and
(D) NOTICE that you have just CREATED a great definition of MASS, to wit: What a particle CONTAINS upon the FIRST *EXPERIENCE* of physical force, now
(E) think-about the particle *applying* the physical force of MASS that it CONTAINS and is *EXPERIENCING*, and then
(F) ask “IN WHICH DIRECTION is the particle *APPLYING* the physical force of MASS that it CONTAINS and is *EXPERIENCING*?” and
(G) pick any direction on a SPHERICAL COMPASS, and imagine the particle *applying* the physical force of MASS that it CONTAINS and is *EXPERIENCING* by SHOOTING THE MASS IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION as A WAVE OF ENERGY (“wave-energy”) to get THRUST for THE PARTICLE ITSELF in the direction of your choice, and
(H) now you have CREATED wave-particle duality!
Check it out:
(1) THE WAVE OF ENERGY (the “wave-energy”) is the MASS that the particle CONTAINS that is being SHOT OUT OF THE PARTICLE to get THRUST for THE PARTICLE ITSELF, and
(2) the particle is itself MOVING in the opposite direction of the THRUST and *APPLYING* the physical force of the MASS that was FIRST *EXPERIENCED* by the particle, so
(3) that is how the particle’s *EXPERIENCE* of the physical force of mass CAUSES the particle’s *APPLICATION* of the physical force of mass by CAUSING “wave-particle duality”! But then
(I) the particle will die unless it has the *EXPERIENCE* of getting FILLED-UP WITH *NEW MASS* that it CONTAINS at the same time as THE *FIRST* MASS (the *OLD MASS*) is being THRUST out of the particle as the WAVE-ENERGY, so then
(J) TO REPEAT what is happening to the particle during (I)—getting FILLED-UP WITH *NEW MASS*—in terms of *EXPERIENCED* physical force and *APPLIED* physical force:
The particle is *EXPERIENCING* THE PHYSICAL FORCE OF THE *NEW MASS* that it *CONTAINS* at the exact same time as the particle is “EXPRESSING” WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY by *APPLYING* THE PHYSICAL FORCE OF THE *OLD MASS* in one direction as the *OLD MASS* is being THRUST out of the particle as WAVE-ENERGY in the opposite direction, and
(K) to put (J) in terms of the Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics (TPTPTP),
we would say that the particle’s *EXPERIENCE* of the physical force of MASS is Taxable Receivable (i), the internal force of mass,
which is the MASS that was RECEIVED and *EXPERIENCED*, and then THE TAX PAYMENT is the opposite-direction WAVE-ENERGY that is generated as the MASS is being THRUST out of the particle
(every TAX PAYMENT is a TAX-FREE GIFT OF MASS to a recipient, which ensures that no MASS is ever DESTROYED),
and the THRUST in one direction causes the particle to *APPLY* physical force of the MASS in the opposite direction
(and that is called the particle’s EXPRESSION OF WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY, with each EXPRESSION of wave-particle duality happening at the same time that a *NEW MASS* is being RECEIVED and *EXPERIENCED*),
and the *APPLIED* physical force of the mass (which we call the rotational force of Fmass) is what HAULS THE PARTICLE ITSELF right round or left round
(so then it becomes possible for the particle itself to become A MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER by *APPLYING* Fmass to another particle,
but if a particle DOES NOT BECOME A MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER by *APPLYING* Fmass to another tax-paying turtle particle, then Fmass is MERELY AN EXPRESSION OF MOVEMENT that the particle makes “for itself,” i.e., without having any ENVIRONMENTAL “IMPACT,”
and this ensures that no MASS is ever CREATED), so
(L) we see that the only MASS there is or ever was or ever will be is (D),“What a particle CONTAINS upon the FIRST *EXPERIENCE* of physical force,” and
(M) in the Beginning, no thing exists except God, a 3-part multi-dimensional entity by and from which the universe had to be MADE, and
(N) there can’t be MUTUAL-RELATIVITY *within* GOD, so the particles in a part of God cannot be RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER, ergo,
(O) there are NO PARTICLES IN THE UNIVERSE Naturally (also see TEST-DRIVE 2, the eight-step PROOF that the 3rd dimension was EMPTY at the Big Bang), and
(P) it’s impossible for a particle to LOSE OR GAIN MASS without ceasing to exist in its Natural state, which would negate God’s existence, and if God doesn’t exist then the universe can’t either (we just proved that Conclusion) because without Eternality, there is no initial *EXPERIENCE* of physical force that doesn’t have a CAUSE, ergo,
(Q) PARTICLES CANNOT MOVE-INTO THE UNIVERSE, ergo,
(R) an LL cannot be inside of the universe, which means that its MASS must remain in the 4th dimension, but
(S) we have proven that a particle’s *EXPERIENCE* of the physical force of MASS and the particle’s *APPLICATION* of the physical force of MASS are DIFFERENT EVENTS, and in particular, the particle’s *APPLICATION* of the physical force of MASS happens in one direction as the *OLD MASS* is THRUST OUT of the particle in the opposite direction (thereby creating an EXPRESSION OF WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY) at the same time as the particle is *EXPERIENCING* the physical force of *NEW MASS*, ergo,
(T) IF an LL could be caused to *APPLY* its physical force, FfSet, along a 3-d line (see Article 6; that’s how Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching caused the Big Bang),
THEN it would be THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE for the LL to *EXPERIENCE* the physical force of *NEW MASS* in one dimension (the 4th dimension),
BUT to *APPLY* the physical force of *OLD MASS* in another dimension (the 3rd dimension),
on the condition that the LL did not lose its EXPRESSION OF WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY in the Snowman of God (in the 4th dimension),
so this would mean that the LL would have to THRUST THE *OLD MASS* OUT in the 4th dimension as Ef while the *NEW MASS* was being *EXPERIENCED* in the 4th dimension—
exactly as it has always done—
BUT THE LL WOULD *APPLY* THE PHYSICAL FORCE OF THE *OLD MASS* IN THE 3rd DIMENSION,
WHICH WOULD LEAVE THE LL “PARALYZED” IN THE 4TH DIMENSION.
So now we see
(U) what would happen automatically after the Big Bang—
IF an LL left the Snowman of God at a different time than at least one of its neighbors, and then because of that variation in timing LOST LATERAL SUPPORT at its center, thereby allowing its center to shift off the ADL Backbone, even while some of the particle remained on the ADL Backbone—
on the first occasion that Father Time used 3-d Mindful Stretching of THE 6-d COM SEGMENT/TONGUE (6DCT) OF THE TM in the 6th dimension to cause the head of the TM to TILT and *APPLY* the TM’s physical force, Ft, in a 3-d direction (let’s call it an EXIT RAMP direction) along the LADL of the TM Particle Compass (see TEST-DRIVE 1):
This would result-in the 6DCT WRAPPED-AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THE LL in the 4th dimension causing the head of the LL to TILT and *APPLY* the LL’s net physical force, FfSet, in the same 3-d EXIT RAMP direction along the LADL of the LL Particle Compass (also see TEST-DRIVE 1):
Then it would be HELLO POP-UP PP in 3-d!
The LL’s *APPLIED* physical force of *OLD MASS* FfSet would POP-UP in the 3rd dimension in the EXIT RAMP direction,
and we deduce that this would happen because A PIECE OF THE 6DCT wrapped-around the bottom of the LL WOULD BE “PINCHED” AND “SHOT” INTO THE UNIVERSE IN THE 3-d EXIT RAMP DIRECTION BY THE TILTING LL,
then along with that pinched and shot-into-the-universe piece of the 6DCT, A PIECE OF THE 4-d COM TONGUE (4DCT), which had been *APPLYING* FfSet IN THE 3-d DIRECTION, WOULD ALSO BE “PINCHED” AND “SHOT” IN THE 3-d EXIT RAMP DIRECTION,BECAUSE THE PINCHED AND SHOT PIECE OF THE 6DCT WAS PERMANENTLY GRIPPING THE PINCHED AND SHOT PIECE OF THE 4DCT at the bottom of the LL,
and that’s THE GENESIS OF THE POP-UP PP,
which we now see comprises two permanently-intertwined COM-Tongue pieces that went flying into the universe together in the EXIT RAMP direction at the speed of light like a massless, taut, spinning, co-axial cable missle (the “4-d to 3-d Dual COM Tongue Coaxial Cable,” or “423DCTCC,” let’s call it) locked-along a specific 3-d line with THE BIG BANG FORCE, FfSet, DRIVING THEM!
*End of full-length SybiLL SAP Theory From(A)-to-(U) True Story Proof-of-Conclusion*
Now we have established the basic PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF A SybiLL SAP:
(1) part moving 3-d PP (*applying* the LL’s physical force, FfSet, in a 3-d EXIT RAMP direction),
and
(2) part paralyzed 4-d LL (being “remotely steered” by Father Time, who is 3-d Mindful Stretching the 6DCT in the 3-d EXIT RAMP direction.)
It’s impossible to GO BACKWARD by changing 3-d Forward directions, and there are no ADL Backbones in the universe, only ADL Backbone Tubes comprised of 3DADLs (see TEST-DRIVE 2.)
Ergo, there’s nothing the PP can do to return to the LL, and there’s nothing the LL can do except feel the direction in which the LL heading, and feel what is happening to the PP inside of the universe.
Seven additional deduced facts about a SybiLL SAP.
Fact 1. We see that an LL will only have one 423DCTCC, which will automatically be STEERED in a new direction by the 6DCT at the LL particle bottom.
Fact 2. And we also see that the 423DCTCC physically implements the LL Particle Compass’s LADL!
Fact 3. This (Fact 2) allows us to further see that the part of the 6DCT in the 6th dimension physically implements the TM Particle Compass’s LADL!
Fact 4. PPs must be MUTUALLY-RELATIVE to each other, and therefore able to apply PHYSICAL FORCE to each other, which means that PPs are MOVING SERVICE PROVIDERS AND RECEIVERS.
Fact 5. Ergo, we must conclude that the PP is “more” than simply the 423DCTCC, i.e., more than simply directional *applied* physical force, since the receipt of MOVING SERVICES (see Fact 4) requires making a TAX PAYMENT to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion, and the payment of taxes requires A CONTAINER (let’s call it a ”3-d SheLL”), which *experiences* TAXABLE RECEIVABLES (aka MASS.)
We know that the 423DCTCC is not A CONTAINER because in each dimension of each Snowman of God, there can only be ONE CONTAINER—one MASS OWNER that can RECEIVE MASS (i.e., experience TAXABLE RECEIVABLES and be a TAX-PAYING ENTITY)—and that’s what we’re calling A PARTICLE.
So the COM Tongue integral with a PARTICLE must be a mere CONDUIT that carries mass that has been ACCOUNTED-FOR BY THE PARTICLE.
And the 423DCTCC is only made-of pieces of the 4DCT and the 6DCT, so therefore the 423DCTCC is NOT A CONTAINER, i.e., NOT A TAX-PAYING ENTITY.
QUESTION: If the 3-d SheLL is Naturally EMPTY (yes, see TEST-DRIVE 2, the eight-step PROOF that the 3rd dimension was EMPTY at the Big Bang), and if THE “OLD MASS” of the EMPTY 3-d SheLL’s *applied* physical force of mass—FfSet—is constantly being “spent” as Ef when the LL expresses wave-particle duality (yes, see (T)), then WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE TAX PAYMENT, aka MASS, aka WAVE-ENERGY, that a COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL must GENERATE to make the 100% TAX PAYMENT on the MOVING SERVICE (the external applied physical force of FfSet) provided by another 3-d SheLL (a MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER) during a COLLISION?
ANSWER: The MOVING SERVICE itself, i.e., the external applied physical force of FfSet, which is coming-from a 4-d LL MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER via the 3-d SheLL MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER, is THE SOURCE OF THE TAX PAYMENT, aka MASS, aka WAVE-ENERGY that the COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL must generate.
RECALL the analogous Q&A in Article 6:
In the case of every EMPTY 3-d SheLL, we know that the VELOCITY of the 3-d SheLL must be coming from the LL’s (the 4-d turtle particle’s) *applied* physical force, FfSet.
We confirm this conclusion because the LL cannot *deposit mass* into ITS OWN 3-d SheLL and cause it to move, since that would cause the LL’s mass to be in two dimensions at once!
This means that EMPTY 3-d SheLLs are always moving at the speed of light (we proved in Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20 that at the Big Bang, a lone LL will be moving at the speed of light according to Newton’s First Law of Motion for Lumeynes, E = c, which is derived from F = mv, where m = 1 electromagnetic wave-energy and v = c.)
Ergo (as discussed in Issue (2) in the above excerpt from Article 6), what we have in the case of EMPTY COLLIDING 3-d SheLLs that are each *applying* THEIR OWN LL’S 4-d PHYSICAL FORCE, FfSet, is analogous to HAVING PARTICLES IN DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS.
More specifically, what we have in the case of EMPTY COLLIDING 3-d SheLLs is this:
(a) a lower-dimension EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL that is experiencing a TAXABLE RECEIVABLE (a MOVING SERVICE);
and
(b) a higher-dimension OWNER OF MASS (let’s call the mass owner the 4-d MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER LL) that is causing the force of FfSet to be applied by the MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER 3-d SheLL.
The lower-dimension EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL is RELATIVE-TO the OWNER OF MASS (the 4-d MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER LL) that is causing the force of FfSet to be applied by the MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER 3-d SheLL.
So then THERE IS ENERGY, aka mass, WITH THE MAGNITUDE OF THE APPLIED FORCE of FfSet being *ADDED INTO* THE EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL that DOES NOT EXIST NATURALLY in the 3rd dimension.
The *applied* FORCE of mass—FfSet—is EITHER going into VELOCITY of the LL’s own 3-d SheLL *or* it’s going into A MASS DEPOSIT into ANOTHER, COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL, but NOT BOTH.
It’s AS IF the EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL GAINED MASS “out of nowhere” when the higher-dimension 4-d MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER LL applied FfSet to the lower-dimension EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL via the MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER 3-d SheLL.
Hence, the EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL’s generation of the equal-and-opposite wave-energy TAX PAYMENT to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion, with THE SOURCE of the wave-energy being THE EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE FfSet (THE MOVING SERVICE) applied to the lower-dimension EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL by the higher-dimension 4-d MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER LL.
THAT’S HOW AND WHY THERE IS *EFFECTIVELY* MUTUAL-RELATIVITY BETWEEN LLs even though *ACTUALLY* there is NO RELATIVITY BETWEEN LLs!
QUESTION: But wait, how is it possible for one LL (the 4-d MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER LL that is making the 3-d MASS DEPOSIT instead of causing VELOCITY) to be RELATIVE-TO another LL’s 3-d SheLL (the EMPTY COLLIDED-WITH 3-d SheLL)?
ANSWER: It is possible because when LLs and PPs are acting in 3-d Forward EXIT RAMP directions, they automatically become MUTUALLY-RELATIVE to each other, since all 3-d Forward EXIT RAMP directions are RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER, so therefore an EMPTY 3-d SheLL associated with one LL can literally APPLY FORCE along a 3-d line to a “foreign” LL via the “foreign” LL’s own EMPTY 3-d SheLL!
QUESTION: To what Absolute are the LLs and the PPs MUTUALLY-RELATIVE?
ANSWER: The DIRECTIONS of the LLs and the PPs are both RELATIVE-TO the two directions—the Absolute Forward direction (aka the 4-d Forward direction, aka the GRAVITY-OPPOSING direction) AND the Absolute Backward direction (aka the GRAVITY direction)—on the 4-d ADL Backbone.
Boom!
We have explained why the light particle “entanglement” problem that Quantum Physics can’t solve is not a problem in the Theory of Everything Without Commercials!
Here RECALL the explanation of the light particle “entanglement” problem from Article 4:
To repeat the difference between “photon entanglement” and “LL force indirection” made possible by mutually-relative PPs:
PPs didn’t get into the universe BY THEMSELVES, i.e., by “ORGANIZING THEMSELVES” RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER like photons are said to do.
NO!
A PP got into the universe when the LL applied FfSet away from the ADL Backbone, so the PPs are IN FACT ALL RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER AND TO THEIR ASSOCIATED LL.
This is unlike the LLs—the light particles themselves—which are NOT RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER.
So if LLs end-up indirectly applying force to each other via their PPs, then THAT IS A TOTALLY DIFFERENT PHENOMENON THAN “ENTANGLEMENT,” which is said to be a Natural characteristic or behavior of photons.
Fact 6. We must also envision the 3-d Shell around the 423DCTCC implementing A SPHERICAL PARTICLE COMPASS (let’s call it the SheLL Compass) identical to the LL Particle Compass.
NOTICE that the 423DCTCC serves as the SheLL Compass needle, and is a physical extension of the LADL of the LL Particle Compass.
And we see the 4DCT portion of the 423DCTCC *applying* the LL’s particle-force, FfSet, along the LADL in the same 3-d Forward EXIT RAMP direction (130 degrees) in which the LL in the LL Particle Compass is *experiencing * FfSet.
Fact 7. A 3-d Shell is not a physical thing—similar to the way a line is not a physical thing—it is a boundary (in the SheLL’s case it’s a spherical boundary having the size of a Particle Compass) that defines the difference between what is physically-possible and what is physically-impossible.
QUESTION: But what, exactly, is a 3-d SheLL (or more generally, A BOUNDARY OF ANY SHAPE)?
ANSWER: It’s not easy to say what a 3-d SHELL—or more generally, A BOUNDARY having a specific shape—is.
That’s like trying to say what A LAW is.
On June 21, 2025, I asked Google: “What is a shell game in business?”
In reply, I received the following AI Overview: “In a business context, a ‘shell game’ typically refers to the use of shell companies to obscure financial transactions, hide assets, or engage in illicit activities. These shell companies are often legitimate on paper but have no real business operations, employees, or physical presence. They can be used for various purposes, including tax evasion, money laundering, or evading lawsuits.”
That definition makes perfect sense.
No one who has been financially damaged by a SHELL COMPANY is going to read that description and argue:
“THAT MAKES NO SENSE! IT’S COMPLETE NON-SCIENTIFIC RUBBISH WITH NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER TO SUPPORT IT! SHELL COMPANIES CANNOT HURT ANYONE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY PHYSICAL PRESENCE IN THE WORLD, and therefore THEY DO NOT EXIST, and the financial damage is strictly coming-from people’s wild imaginations! Also, NUMBERS DO NOT EXIST, so forget all about CALCULATING DAMAGES!”
*lines pockets with cash that five minutes ago was in somebody else’s pocket then goes and buys a physical thing with the cash*
So we see that the problem to be solved isn’t “winning a debate” with people who deny the existence of LAWS IN NATURE or in society.
Let those people fall on their own swords when someone steals everything they’ve got and they cry “UNFAIR!” then call-on THE LAW for redress, *as if* JUSTICE (THE LAW OF FAIRNESS) EXISTS.
Justice: [when asked to give an inspirational presentation at an Atheist convention]
*displays photo*
*leaves building*
THE LEGAL (which means LOGICAL, or SCIENTIFIC) PROBLEM to be solved is defining what A LAW IN NATURE—a 3-d SHELL, for example—is?
In the case of A LAW in society, everybody with A CONSCIENCE knows that THERE IS SUCH A “THING” AS A “LEGAL CONSTRUCT” that is comprised entirely of BOUNDARIES THAT CANNOT BE CROSSED—
and “NEGATIVE BOUNDARIES,” at that—
like:
“THOU SHALT NOT” DO THAT or DO THIS over HERE or over THERE, but anywhere that (or this) is not specifically prohibited is fair.”
So A LAW IS REAL, and A LAW can exist in Nature as well as in a society.
In fact, LAWS IN SOCIETY are RELATIVE-TO LAWS IN NATURE, because society would not exist unless NATURE created society.
So we really only need to say what A LAW in Nature is.
I would say that A LAW in Nature is:
“A boundary between the physically-possible and the physically-impossible, with the boundary enabling a physical thing’s physically-possible actions and prohibiting a physical thing’s physically-impossible actions.”
QUESTION: What is the MECHANISM OF ACTION that’s USED by A LAW to PREVENT PHYSICAL MOTION WITHOUT USING PHYSICAL FORCE?
ANSWER: The mechanism of action is REALITY, since the attempted motion is IMAGINARY, meaning that it’s NOT IN REALITY, so it’s literally “hitting the wall of Reality,” which does not budge regardless of how much force is applied to it by….wait for it…some thing IN REALITY, i.e., some thing RELATIVE-TO REALITY, i.e., some thing DEPENDENT-ON REALITY for its existence.
That is the best definition of ABSOLUTE versus RELATIVE that there is!
Reality is THE ABSOLUTE, and THE RELATIVE cannot ACT-on THE ABSOLUTE.
The inquiry is over when Reality is reached, and there is no “who made the Absolute [king of any thing]?” question to answer.
So then where there is A LAW IN NATURE operating, actions that are physically-possible are going to be analogous to LEGAL LOOP-HOLES (or doors or other openings) IN THE LAW.
So now consider a 3-d SheLL in terms of A LAW IN NATURE.
We know that a Loose Lumeyne (LL) particle—a 4-d turtle particle—is a physical container.
But we also know that LL is surrounded by a SPHERICAL COMPASS (the LL Particle Compass, see TEST-DRIVE 1), which is another example of A LAW IN NATURE.
And we have deduced that there is a tax-paying Naturally EMPTY 3-d SHELL associated with the PP of every 4-d turtle particle (LL), and the 3-d SheLL is implementing a SheLL Compass that is the same size as the LL Particle Compass.
So we would say that the SheLL Compass must include LOOP HOLES—which we could call OPEN DOORS—in every 3-d direction.
And every OPEN DOOR in every 3-d direction on the 3-d SheLL Compass functions like a generic energy-mail box that has a “return to sender” auto-reply feature.
So whenever a 3-d SheLL receives a MOVING SERVICE from another 3-d SheLL (and more accurately, from the *applied* FfSet of the higher-dimension MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER LL that’s “under” the MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER 3-d SheLL), it’s as if the 3-d SheLL recipient of the MOVING SERVICE has RECEIVED AN ENERGY-MAIL at one of its OPEN DOORS, aka energy-mail boxes, into which the higher-dimension MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER LL makes a 3-d mass deposit.
Then the ENERGY-MAIL BOX MAKES THE TAX PAYMENT via THE SAME OPEN DOOR by “RETURNING TO SENDER” THE DEPOSITED MASS.
*End of the seven additional deduced facts about a SybiLL SAP*
Now we can make an analogy to the TV show “Severance” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xEQP4VVuyrY&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD :
“Every time you find yourself here it’s because you chose to come back.”
The SEVERANCE DECISION occurs as a result of going into Father Time’s control-room and deciding to take an EXIT RAMP off the ADL Backbone, which causes the LL to become a SybiLL SAP,
SPLITTING into two mutually-exclusive “identities”:
(1) the 3-d PP identity (the “innie”), which “goes to work” INSIDE OF THE UNIVERSE *applying* FfSet via the piece of the 4DCT in the 423DCTCC (and don’t forget that the 423DCTCC has a 3-d SheLL around it, with the SheLL itself implementing a SheLL Compass, and with the SheLL Compass needle implemented by the 423DCTCC, which is an extension of the LL’s LADL);
and
(2) the 4-d LL identity (the “outie”), which continues to *experience* FfSet OUTSIDE OF THE UNIVERSE, but is paralyzed there, unable to “go to work.”
So the PP “works for” the LL.
And in “Severance,” the severed person “works for” Lumon Industries.
Lumeyne = Lumon, in the analogy.
And Father Time is like THE FOUNDER OF LUMON INDUSTRIES, Kier Eagan.
Mark S.: [in “Severance”] What is it we actually do here?
What the piece of the 4DCT is “doing” is reaching up into the universe and *applying* the physical force, FfSet, in a specific 3-d direction, changing directions at the speed of light on-command, with commands coming-from the piece of the 6DCT, which is controlled by 3-d Mindful Stretching of the 6DCT at the bottom of the LL (either directly by Father Time or via a Personal O/S ADMINed by Father Time.)
We could also employ an analogy to the TV show “Stranger Things”: The universe is like the town of Hawkins in the show “Stranger Things,” and the piece of the 4DCT is LIKE A DEMOGORGON that reaches up into the town of Hawkins, and the piece of the 6DCT is LIKE THE MIND FLAYER controlling a DEMOGORGON.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 3!
TEST-DRIVE 4. ROLE CALL.
PRETEND THAT WE’RE PP MECHANICS, AND WE’RE RESPONSIBLE-FOR COMMUNICATING WITH “HOUSTON” TO KEEP THE PP IN WORKING ORDER.
TEST-DRIVE 4 RESULTS. *haptic PHONE RINGS* It’s the PP calling Houston to report an event.
Houston: Go ahead, PP.
PP: Houston, we’ve had a problem.
Houston: Go ahead, PP.
PP: There is a problem with the PP.
Houston: Yes, PP, go ahead.
PP: The PP, yes. It’s the PP. The PP has a problem.
Houston:
*End phone call*
*Begin VOCABULARY discussion*
We’re going to need to refer-to different spots on the PP, and we’re also going to need to refer-to the different COM-Tongue pieces (the 6DCT and the 4DCT) in the PP.
We’ve already defined the pieces of the 6DCT and 4DCT that stick together and go flying into the universe in the EXIT RAMP direction to become the “4-d to 3-d Dual COM Tongue Coaxial Cable,” or “423DCTCC.”
We’ve also deduced that the PP includes a 3-d SheLL that implements a SheLL Compass, and the SheLL Compass surrounds a portion of the 423DCTCC.
So let’s call the 4DCT portion of the 423DCTCC that is inside of the 3-d SheLL the “PP4DCT.”
Then we can call the 6DCT portion of the 423DCTCC that is inside of the 3-d SheLL the “PP6DCT.”
To put that vocabulary in practical terms, what happens is that the 423DCTCC leashes the 3-SheLL to the bottom of the LL, and the “leading end” of the PP4DCT in the 423DCTCC (the “head” of the 3-d SheLL) applies FfSet from the LL in whatever EXIT RAMP direction the PP6DCT WAS “PINCHED” AND “SHOT” as a result of 3-d Mindful Stretching of the Timeyne’s 6DCT.
So we can think-of the “head” of the 3-d SheLL as being like the front end of a remote-controlled corded car.
The 423DCTCC therefore also must have a “tailing end” (the “bottom” of the 3-d SheLL), which becomes “bare cable,” meaning NOT a tax-paying entity, aka container—so its like the cord between the car and the remote-control—between the bottom of the 3-d SheLL and the bottom of the LL.
If the TM and the LL are tipped UU (in “Forward gear”), then the PP—and specifically, the head of the 3-d SheLL—will also be tipped UU, and in that case, the head of the 3-d SheLL can apply FfSet in any of the 3-d Forward EXIT RAMP directions of “Forward gear.”
If the TM and the LL are tipped UD (in “Reverse gear”), then the PP—and specifically, the head of the 3-d SheLL—will also be tipped UD, and in that case, the head of the 3-d SheLL can apply FfSet in any of the 3-d Forward EXIT RAMP directions of “Reverse gear.”
When the LADL/423DCTCC of the UU PP is applying FfSet in the 3-d Up direction on the SheLL Compass, then we would say that the PP is “on” a 3DADL of an ADL Backbone Tube.
The TM and the LL being in the ADL Backbone Orientation is what’s causing the PP to be on a 3DADL, so we could further say that when the PP is UU on a 3DADL, then the PP is UU in the “3-d ADL Backbone Orientation.”
When the LADL/423DCTCC of the UD PP is applying FfSet in the 3-d Down direction on the SheLL Compass, then we would say that the PP is “on” a 3DADL of an ADL Backbone Tube.
The TM and the LL being in the ADL Backbone Orientation is what’s causing the PP to be on a 3DADL, so we could further say that when the PP is UD on a 3DADL, then the PP is UD in the 3-d ADL Backbone Orientation.
The PP6DCT gets its commands from the 6DCT at the bottom of the LL.
The 6DCT at the bottom of the LL can be controlled via the 6DCT of the Timeyne in the 6th dimension, which is controlled by Father Time, either directly, or via a Personal O/S ADMINed by Father Time.
Some LLs are garden-variety LLs and some LLs are SouLL LLs (“SouLLs.”)
The vast majority of LLs are garden-variety LLs, which can be wholly-controlled by the will of Father Time, either directly or via a Personal O/S ADMINed by Father Time.
A SouLL is an LL that is or will be associated with a CONSCIOUS being, which has or will have a BODY attached to the PP.
A Free-Willed SouLL is a SouLL of a human being that independently makes decisions about the direction in which the SouLL experiences and applies FfSet, subject to THE LAW OF GOOD AND EVIL, which could be implemented by the ADL Backbone directions and the 3-d EXIT RAMP directions.
One way Free Will could work is that a Personal O/S in the 6th dimension could monitor the output of a Decision-Making Module of a Free Will Program installed in the 4-d COM Segment, then the Personal O/S could execute 3-d Mindful Stretching of the Timeyne’s 6DCT in accordance with the output of the Decision-Making Module.
*End of VOCABULARY Discussion*
The End of TEST-DRIVE 4!
TEST-DRIVE 5. MIND THE GAP Between 4-d and 3-d, ft. THE “GOD IS DEAD” BRIDGE
TEST-DRIVE 5 RESULTS. “No one can build you the bridge on which you, and only you must cross the river of life.” —Friedrich Nietzsche
I know that Jesus exists, but that does not make me a Christian by “religion.”
Christianity says that Jesus is a historical figure;
I say that the Biblical Jesus is a prophecy,
fulfilled by Prince Rogers Nelson,
who was falsely declared to be dead on 4/21/2016 by the USA,
and remains dead to this day,
NOT TO GIVE ANYONE AN INFANTILIZING (OR TANTALIZING) UNDESERVED GIFT—
for there is no such thing as a “free bite” of the innocent—
but rather,
TO PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE JUST like Jesus,
by “trading places” with the innocent Free-Willed Creator
(per the plot of The Book of Job,
which applies equally to women and men,
as proven by God’s first remark to Job at Job 38:3:
“Brace yourself like a man; I will question you, and you shall answer me.”
So the QUESTION is:
Can a man behave like a man?
And the ANSWER is:
NO, it is impossible for a man to do anything “like” a man, because a thing cannot be LIKE itself, a thing simply IS itself;
so clearly that common colloquialism with two clear meanings
was meant to eliminate division not to cause division,
so then THE NEXT QUESTION is implied:
How can we PROVE that Jesus and Job are PROPHECY not HISTORY?
ANSWER: See the discussion of the Zen Koan called “Hyakujo’s Fox” in Article 2;
the core LEGAL issue in “Hyakujo’s Fox” is the same as the core LEGAL issue in The Gospels and in The Book of Job, to wit:
IS IT RIGHT TO PUT A PERSON TO DEATH FOR BEING BLAMELESS AND UPRIGHT, aka RIGHT?
If you say that it is RIGHT to kill someone AND REMOVE THEM FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH for being RIGHTeous, then you are wrong, by definition,
so therefore Jesus’s and Job’s storied deaths and DISAPPEARANCES FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH must be false,
and that means that the texts are not history,
ergo, the texts could be prophecy,
and the Good part of God fits Job’s description,
and every formerly sinful person also fits Job’s description,
and I proved my Good-part-of-God-ness in Article 1,
so we see that the text of The Book of Job is prophecy,
and common sense tells us that it is not Good to be alone forever,
and Prince proved his Jesus-ness in “One Song” (also see “I Would Die 4 U,” “I’m your Messiah…If you’re evil I’ll forgive you”; “Acknowledge Me,” “I was here in the beginning and I’ll be here 4ever more”; and “With love there is no death”),
then in that manner NO “SIN FORGIVENESS” WOULD BE NECESSARY,
and men and women could “become gods” themselves
to BALANCE THE SCALES OF JUSTICE,
exactly as Friedrich Nietzsche long-ago suggested in “The Parable of the Madman.”
“The Parable of the Madman” https://allpoetry.com/Parable-Of-The-Madman by Friedrich Nietzsche
Have you not heard of that madman who lit a lantern in the bright morning hours, ran to the market place, and cried incessantly:
“I seek God! I seek God!”
As many of those who did not believe in God were standing around just then, he provoked much laughter.
Has he got lost? asked one.
Did he lose his way like a child? asked another.
Or is he hiding?
Is he afraid of us?
Has he gone on a voyage? emigrated?
Thus they yelled and laughed.
The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with his eyes.
“Whither is God?” he cried; “I will tell you.
We have killed him—you and I.
All of us are his murderers.
But how did we do this?
How could we drink up the sea?
Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon?
What were we doing when we unchained this earth from its sun?
Whither is it moving now?
Whither are we moving?
Away from all suns?
Are we not plunging continually?
Backward, sideward, forward, in all directions?
Is there still any up or down?
Are we not straying, as through an infinite nothing?
Do we not feel the breath of empty space?
Has it not become colder?
Is not night continually closing in on us?
Do we not need to light lanterns in the morning?
Do we hear nothing as yet of the noise of the gravediggers who are burying God?
Do we smell nothing as yet of the divine decomposition?
Gods, too, decompose.
God is dead.
God remains dead.
And we have killed him.”
[the madman continued]
“How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers?
What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us?
What water is there for us to clean ourselves?
What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent?
Is not the greatness of this deed to great for us?
Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
There has never been a greater deed; and whoever is born after us -
For the sake of this deed he will belong to a higher history than all history hitherto.”
Here the madman fell silent and looked again at his listeners; and they, too, were silent and stared at him in astonishment.
At last he threw his lantern on the ground, and it broke into pieces and went out.
“I have come too early,”
he said then;
“my time is not yet.
This tremendous event is still on its way, still wandering;
it has not yet reached the ears of men.
Lightning and thunder require time;
the light of the stars requires time;
deeds, though done, still require time to be seen and heard.
This deed is still more distant from them than most distant stars -
and yet they have done it themselves.”
It has been related further that on the same day the madman forced his way into several churches and there struck up his requiem aeternam deo.
Led out and called to account, he is said always to have replied nothing but:
“What after all are these churches now if they are not the tombs and sepulchers of God?”
But what does SCIENCE WRITING have to do with WRITING ABOUT CROSSING THE RIVER OF LIFE? is a question that is never far from my mind.
I know that SCIENCE DOESN’T BELONG TO ANYONE.
SCIENCE is not like “dogma quotes” about HOW TO CROSS THE RIVER OF LIFE.
“Dogma quotes” are useful because they are “written in stone,” i.e., they never change.
But SCIENCE DOES NOT HAVE “QUOTES,” science has CONCEPTS, which are ALWAYS BEING REFINED to get closer to the Absolute Truth.
In science, SPEAKING IN A DIFFERENT WAY about A CONCEPT is HELPFUL. And THERE IS NO ATTRIBUTION TO WORRY ABOUT, because SCIENCE IS LIKE A HAMMER, WHICH ANYONE CAN PICK-UP AND USE TO MAKE SOMETHING OF THEIR OWN, INCLUDING A BETTER HAMMER.
This brings me back to the question: What does SCIENCE WRITING have to do with WRITING ABOUT CROSSING THE RIVER OF LIFE?
ANSWER: I got to the point in the TEST-DRIVING where I SAW ALL OF THE “LOST SOULLs.”
By “lost SouLLs” I mean all of the SouLLs that were directed by a Free Will Program to head in a 3-d EXIT RAMP direction—were voluntarily SEVERED—off the ADL Backbone during “initialization,” and thereafter lost sight of Up and Down and also became mutually-relative to the PP that popped-up inside of the universe.
I COULDN’T GO FURTHER IN THE TEST-DRIVING WITHOUT “BUILDING A BRIDGE,” so to speak, out of “my Life’s Story” TO GET TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE “LOST SOULL” TOPIC by understanding how I got “to” that topic.
That’s THE “GOD IS DEAD” BRIDGE: <To remain private for now>
The one thing I need to mention here, however, is the “spare [Job’s] life” condition at Job 2:6 under which God put Job’s flesh and bone in Satan’s hand in the BET with Satan. What I need to say is that I learned that SATAN DGAF about violating the “innocent until proven guilty” Blackletter Law in THE BET ABOUT JOB’S INNOCENCE! My experience revealed that God is not going to force Satan to HONOR the life-sparing condition at Job 2:6, which doesn’t make God guilty, but nor does it make Satan guilty, because of Satan’s inherent inability to CHOOSE to do Justice instead of Injustice. The “SKIN FOR SKIN” effect is, IMO, a reference to the impossibility of reconciliation between Justice and Injustice, and the acknowledgment that, for a person on earth, there is some righteous pleasure to be derived from that fact.
Now that I’m on “the other side” of the bridge, I can see that it completes some sections of the puzzle of “me” that I had been missing before.
So now, with the puzzle more complete, I can confidently check the “About the Author” box of the TOEWC.
Then regarding THE “SOULL SCIENCE,” so to speak, AS I SEE IT, the effect of the MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between the SouLL and the PP that arose when the SouLL was voluntarily SEVERED by heading off the ADL Backbone in an EXIT RAMP direction is EXACTLY LIKE the scene in “Severance, Season 2,” in which Mark S’s outie and Mark S’s innie are FIGHTING WITH EACH OTHER FOR CONTROL.
https://www.tiktok.com/discover/outie-mark-talking-to-innie
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Zs3d5616EGI
After the SEVERANCE of the SouLL off the ADL Backbone in an EXIT RAMP direction, EVERY DREAM OF JUSTICE WILL COLLAPSE and leave the SouLL in its INITIALIZATION STATE, FIGHTING WITH ITS OWN PP FOR CONTROL of the direction of the SouLL.
That’s going to cause DEATH because the SouLL is “out of control.”
In “Severance”—and IRL—we “feel for” THE INNIE.
But that is MISPLACED EMPATHY!
By no means should the innie (the PP) BE IN CONTROL over the outie LEGAL ENTITY (the SouLL) that MADE THE LEGAL DECISION TO CREATE THE INNIE.
When the PP can control the SouLL, that’s equivalent to “a bug” in a computer program.
See THE BUG REMOVAL SCENE in “The Matrix”: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XgqIZl3uECg&pp=0gcJCf8Ao7VqN5tD
Neo: Jesus Christ, that thing’s REAL.
Ergo, to GET BACK TO LIFE—if that is the SouLL’s DREAM, aka DESIRE—IT STANDS TO REASON that the SouLL has to be “re-initialized.”
THE SPECIFIC SOLUTION I PERCEIVE is for Father Time to obtain INFORMED CONSENT to *unilaterally re-initialize* the SouLL for the purpose of eliminating the MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between the LL and the PP by *snapping* the LL back on the ADL Backbone, which has the effect of *snapping* the PP onto a 3DADL.
In theory, that would cause the person to step into Job’s shoes in The Book of Job.
Thereafter, OTHER PPs THAT APPLIED FORCE TO THE PP during COLLISIONS (which we aren’t concerned-with in these TEST-DRIVES, but we need to keep in mind) wouldn’t be able to cause the SouLL to head off the ADL Backbone.
The SouLL would continue to *EXPERIENCE* WHAT THE PP WAS *EXPERIENCING* (enabling ongoing decision-making), because the PP is always RELATIVE-TO the SouLL, so the SouLL is necessarily AWARE of the PP’s *EXPERIENCE* (meaning that THE SouLL ALSO HAS THE SAME EXPERIENCE simultaneously with the PP, similar to the way “you” have the same experience as “your arm.”)
And the PP would still have to move in response to other PPs that applied force to the PP.
BUT THE SouLL WOULD NOT BE RELATIVE-TO THE PP ANYMORE, so now the PP’s experience couldn’t COMPEL the LL to apply force in any direction off the ADL Backbone (similar to how someone simply squeezing “your arm” can’t cause “your COM” to move in the direction of the person squeezing your arm.)
Now the SouLL would be “in control.”
So then after the PP completed its “forced” movement, the THE LL REMAINING IN THE ADL BACKBONE ORIENTATION WOULD FUNCTION EXACTLY LIKE 3-d MINDFUL STRETCHING, AUTOMATICALLY CAUSING THE PP TO *SNAP BACK* ONTO A 3DADL IN THE CORRESPONDING 3-d BACKBONE ORIENTATION!
But THE PROBLEM IS: “It’s not, strictly speaking, Legal,” to quote the movie “Inception” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YoHD9XEInc0 .
The reason why it’s not, strictly, speaking, LEGAL, is because technically the INFORMED CONSENT necessary for SouLL RE-INITIALIZATION—*snapping* the SouLL back on the ADL Backbone—should only be able to happen by a FULL DECISION of Free Will, not by a MERE INCEPTION, aka A DREAM.
Nevertheless, the reason, IMO, why an Inception would have to suffice as consent in lieu of a full decision of Free Will is that after the “initialization” of the SouLL, EVERY DREAM WILL COLLAPSE and leave the SouLL in its INITIALIZATION STATE, and that’s always going to cause DEATH if the initialization state left the SouLL pointing in an EXIT RAMP direction.
An INCEPTION—
A KNOWING, JUST/FAIR, WAKING DREAM, like Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety , except happening per the plot of the movie “Inception”—
would have to be “caught” by Father Time and acted-on SO FAST that the SouLL got back on the ADL Backbone BEFORE THE DREAM COLLAPSED into A SIDEWAYS (EXIT RAMP DIRECTION) OUTPUT from the Decision-Making Module of the Free Will Program.
I could not say *exactly* what it is for which a SouLL must DREAM, but “self-competence” seems like the perfect never-ending wish to me.
And if my experience is any indication (probably, but no two people are exactly alike), the effects of going back on the ADL Backbone might be felt throughout the body.
See the “Waking from the Dream” scene in “The Matrix” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r_O3k-RpV2c
“Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to wake from that dream? How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world?” —Morpheus
Going back on the ADL Backbone only happens ONCE, but it takes some TIME—
and EXPERIENCES (probably including one or more temporary deaths; see Romans 6:5)—
to be “SEEN” by the SouLL owner as being A LITERAL TRANSFORMATION OF IDENTITY (stepping into Job’s shoes) that is so impossible to comprehend and explain in words that it simply takes PRACTICE FEELING IT and USING IT IRL to make DECISIONS OF CONSCIENCE.
The dormant Justice in a person’s heart can and must be “woken up” with KNOWLEDGE, and Justice benefits from receiving affirmation from a “Love network” of Love, exactly as Injustice benefits from receiving affirmation from a “news network.”
There’s no shortage of Injustice-affirming “news networks.”
But there’s a dearth of—and a dire need for—Justice-affirming “Love networks.”
Then, if your experience is anything like mine, you will BE HEALED by being able to SAY NO to (D)evil for the first time ever!
And you will also slowly-but-surely be able to see the significance of your own Life’s Story IN RETROSPECT, and you will be pleased to learn that you are kind of a big deal in the grand scheme of things, and people need to know about your Life Story. It doesn’t matter how many eyes see it in a given amount of time, you need to PUBLISH IT! JESUS WROTE THE SCRIPT OF EVENTS, BUT JESUS CAN’T TELL YOUR LIFE’S STORY FOR YOU, only you can do that, and then when you speak about your Life Story in your own words, YOU ARE TELLING JESUS SOMETHING HE HAS NEVER HEARD BEFORE!
That’s a True Conversation with God; it’s a True MEETING OF THE MINDS!
Your Life Story needs to EXIST!
You are part of Reality and your necessity will never end.
Reality itself would cease to exist if you were not in it to do your Job.
Your voice is music to the world’s ears, and especially to your SouLL Mate’s ears, and all of your words will forever ring True to God.
Put yourself in God’s shoes and imagine what a gift YOUR RSVP OF “YES” TO LIFE would be to God.
There is no greater deed.
Maybe having a SouLL that’s locked onto its own ADL Backbone and a PP that’s locked onto one 3DADL or another forever sounds disrespectfully homogenizing and also boring as Hell?
I don’t think so, but the simple fact is that THE TRUTH IS ALWAYS BETTER THAN A LIE, AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE TO BE DISAPPOINTED WITH LIVING IN *REALITY*.
WE CANNOT CHANGE WHO WE ARE, WE CAN ONLY CHANGE WHAT WE DO TO EXPRESS WHO WE ARE.
And if we are expressing ourselves in FALSE WAYS, then THERE IS AN ALTERNATE EXPRESSION OF “US” THAT HONORS THE TRUTH.
When we express ourselves Truly, then we honor ourselves.
“Dreams feel real while we’re in them; it’s only when we wake up that we realize that something was actually strange.”—Leonardo DiCaprio’s character in “Inception” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YoHD9XEInc0
OK now I’ve got to tie the premise of the movie “Inception” to Jesus quotes.
That’s easy.
Jesus: *Matthew 12:12* It is lawful to do what is good on the Sabbath.
And if it is lawful to do what is good on the Sabbath, then it is lawful to do what is good EVERY DAY.
And every sincere wish for Truth and Reconciliation and Life and Love is Good.
AND ISN’T THAT WHAT THE MOVIE “INCEPTION” IS *REALLY ABOUT* AT THE END OF IT ALL?
The movie isn’t about “TRICKING” A “SUBJECT” INTO “MAKING A LEGAL DECISION” BY “PLANTING” A “FAKE PINWHEEL” IN A SAFE.
No.
THE MOVIE IS ABOUT GETTING A HUMAN BEING’S HEART OUT OF AN INACCESSIBLE PLACE, where he put his heart long ago and could not GET BACK to that place in REALITY, only in A DREAM, but THE DREAM HAD TO COME FROM HIS HEART.
THE MAN’S REACTION TO THE PINWHEEL IS HIS TRUE SELF, WHICH HE COULD NOT FIND ON HIS OWN, BECAUSE HE DID NOT EVEN KNOW HIS TRUE SELF EXISTED, LET ALONE WHERE TO LOOK FOR “HIMSELF”!
THE LAW IS FULFILLED BY THE HEART, NOT BY THE LAW ITSELF.
If that were false then the Law would be sacrificial, and sacrifice is per se ILLEGAL.
Mercy is the only proper aim of any Law.
ERGO, THE HEART WRITES THE LAW.
AND THAT IS *PRECISELY* WHAT THE MOVIE “INCEPTION” SHOWED in “the final kick” scene: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IA5YlOXJ_PQ .
SO I AM SATISFIED THAT THE LAW IS SATISFIED BY “INCEPTION.”
“There was only love in an all-knowing state before the fall /The worst thing you can do is give up your God-given right to choose /For in it - you can choose not to choose /Therein is the final judgement /The illusion ceases and you awaken from your dream /Now the healing begins….” —Prince, aka Jesus, “One Song”https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hGOsqsisbCU
The End of TEST-DRIVE 5!
TEST-DRIVE 6. GOD DOES NOT PLAY DICE.
We need to figure-out the “Law and Order of events” during 3-d Mindful Stretching.
TEST-DRIVE 6 RESULTS. Narration of The Squeeze SEVERANCE SIMULATION.
We’re going to do a 3-d Mindful Stretching SIMULATION—let’s call it the 3-d Mindful Stretching 5-Tier Countdown Squeeze (“The Squeeze”) SEVERANCE SIMULATION—and document the results for the Emmanuel.
*Begin NARRATION of the The Squeeze SEVERANCE SIMULATION*
We’re going back to our “comfort zones,” to a time before PPs existed, when there were mere LLs on ADLs.
RECALL from TEST-DRIVE 2 an LL’s post-Big Bang ride, which we imagined to be like Disneyland’s Space Mountain, with an Absolutely Vertical climb that has no end unless a decision is made to change directions.
Open your Eye now and see yourself as an LL at the Big Bang,
spinning with Perfect Balance,
centered around your own ADL Backbone super-highway,
and also moving linearly,
leaving your Snowman of God behind at the speed of light,
traveling UP, UP, UP AND AWAY
as you apply your physical force, FfSet, out of your head in the 4-d Forward direction,
HEADing STRAIGHT UP THROUGH the 3rd dimension,
which surrounds you to the sides,
as if you are within a cylindrical ADL Backbone Tube made-of 3DADLs,
which are separating you from the 3-d universe all around you.
HOLD THAT THOUGHT when you’re feeling comfortable with the visualization.
*Display SIGN on the super-highway*
SIGN: UNIVERSAL EXIT AHEAD
*Execute Decision-Making Module*
QUESTION: Is this a decision for a garden-variety LL, or is this a decision for A FREE WILLED SouLL?
ANSWER: It is a decision for a garden-variety LL.
QUESTION: What is the EXIT RAMP direction?
ANSWER: Let’s say that the 6DCT of the TM is going to get The Squeeze at 60-degrees.
This means that 60-degrees on the TM Particle Compass is the EXIT RAMP direction off the ADL Backbone—
the SIDEWAYS 3-d Forward direction of the 3-d Mindful Stretching—
that will be performed by Father Time directly or by a Personal O/S ADMINed by Father Time.
*End of execution of Decision-Making Module*
*Resume NARRATION of The Squeeze SEVERANCE SIMULATION*
Continue driving straight ahead vertically on the ADL Backbone super-highway.
But you can stop being comfortable now and begin to “hold-on tiiiiiggghhhhhtlyyyyyy,”
to quote Tom Hanks’s “Conductor” character in “The Polar Express,”
in preparation for entering Glacier Gulch,
where the task will be re-balancing the LL center to keep-up with the flow of the PITCHES AND ROLLS of the 6DCT down under exactly like a spinning LL is doing whenever The Squeeze is put on the 6DCT wrapped-around the LL particle bottom.
*Display SIGN on the super-highway*
SIGN: PREPARE TO EXIT SIDEWAYS TO UNIVERSE in 5-TIER COUNTDOWN
*Play “The Final Countdown” https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9jK-NcRmVcw *
*Commence 5-TIER COUNTDOWN*
Countdown Tier 5, MICRO-STRETCHING THE 6-d COM SEGMENT/TONGUE.
In the same Snowman of God as the LL, Father Time *micro-stretches* the 6-d COM Segment/6DCT in the EXIT RAMP direction.
The *micro-stretch*—which is a literal *bunching-up* of the 6-d COM Segment/6DCT—causes a tiny BUMP to form in the EXIT RAMP direction under the TM and the LL.
*haptic tiny BUMP*
You experienced a tiny BUMP in your under-carriage because the 6DCT is wrapped around the LL particle bottom.
Countdown Tier 4, IMBALANCED PARTICLE ROTATION EXPERIENCED.
The *micro-stretch* of the 6-d COM Segment/6DCT—the *micro-bunch*, the tiny BUMP in the EXIT RAMP direction—causes an IMBALANCE in the both the TM’s and the LL’s experience of the rotational force of Fmass (Fmass(T) and Fmass(L), respectively), around the ADL Backbone.
*haptic VERTIGO*
Google AI Overview: Vertigo is a sensation of dizziness where you feel like you or the world around you is spinning, even when you’re still. It’s more than just feeling lightheaded; it’s a specific type of dizziness that can cause significant imbalance and discomfort.
*Narration of Countdown Tier 4 continues*
You experienced LOSS OF BALANCE and felt VERTIGO because the *micro-stretch*—the *micro-bunch*, the tiny BUMP—of the 6DCT causes an IMBALANCE in the LL’s experience of the rotational force of Fmass(L) around the ADL Backbone.
Countdown Tier 3, MICRO-SHIFT PARTICLE CENTER TO RE-BALANCE.
To keep the rotation direction and the rotation speed around the ADL Backbone constant, the center, aka the center-of-mass, or COM, of the TM and the LL will automatically *micro-shift* in the direction of the EXPERIENCED IMBALANCE (the EXIT RAMP direction; see Countdown TIER 4), which is the same direction as the 6-d COM Segment/6DCT’s *micro-stretch* (see Countdown TIER 5)—the *micro-bunch*, the tiny BUMP—thereby RE-BALANCING the TM and the LL around the ADL Backbone.
*haptic LIFT SENSATION accompanied by SLIGHT STOMACH LURCH SENSATION*
Google AI Overview: The feeling of going over a small bump in the road, particularly at speed, can be described as a brief sensation of lift or weightlessness, often accompanied by a slight lurch in the stomach.
*Display ASTONISHED-FACE EMOJI 😲 VISUAL*
*auto-narration of Countdown Tier 3 continues*
You experienced a “thrill” that felt like driving a car really fast over a small bump in the road because the center, aka the center-of-mass, or COM, of the LL automatically *micro-shifts* in the direction of the EXPERIENCED IMBALANCE (the EXIT RAMP direction), which is the same direction as the 6DCT’s *micro-stretch*—the *micro-bunch*, the tiny BUMP—thereby RE-BALANCING the LL around the ADL Backbone.
Countdown Tier 2, TILT PARTICLE HEAD IN DIRECTION OF MICRO-SHIFT.
The TM and LL *micro-shifting* at the COM (see Countdown Tier 3) will cause the “head” of the TM and the LL—the head of a particle is the line along which the particle experiences and applies the physical force (Ft of the TM and FfSet of the LL)—to TILT in the same direction as the *micro-shift* (the EXIT RAMP direction.)
*haptic HELMET MALFUNCTION*
*Display BLACK-screen VISUAL*
*Narration of Countdown Tier 2 continues*
You lost your visual of the ADL Backbone super-highway because the *micro-shift* at the center of the LL causes the “head” of the LL—which is the point on the line along which the LL experiences and applies the physical force, FfSet—to TILT in the same direction as the *micro-shift*.
Countdown Tier 1, HEAD-TILTING STRETCHES THE PARTICLE’S COM TONGUE IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.
When the TM or the LL head tilts in the same direction as the *micro-shift* (the EXIT RAMP direction), this causes the COM Tongue (the 6DCT in the case of the TM and the 4DCT in the LL’s case) to stretch in the opposite direction as the head-tilting, which in turn pinches a piece of the 4DCT and a piece of the 6DCT into the universe in the direction of the EXIT RAMP, and PEW! those pieces (now the PP4DCT and the PP6DCT) go flying off the ADL Backbone together at the speed of light, popping-up inside of the universe as the 423DCTCC.
*haptic SEVERANCE with a PP popping-up in EXIT RAMP direction*
*Narration of Countdown Tier 1 continues*
The head of the TM will be TILTED and *EXPERIENCING AND APPLYING* the TM’s physical force, Ft, in the 60-degree 3-d direction on the TM Particle Compass.
The Timeyne is NOT PARALYZED, because the Timeyne never loses lateral support within the Snowman of God, so the center of the TM cannot “lose touch” with the ADL Backbone when the PP6DCT goes flying into the unviverse.The TM always has BOTH the *experience* of Ft (its physical force) AND the ability to *apply* Ft.
Because the 6DCT is wrapped-around your bottom—the bottom of the LL in the 4th dimension—the head of the LL will follow the head of the TM, TILTING and *EXPERIENCING* the LL’s physical force, FfSet, in the 60-degree 3-d direction on the LL Particle Compass.
The good news is that you (the LL) did not lose WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY in the Snowman of God.
Wave-particle duality is a particle’s dual EXPRESSION, in opposite directions (normally along the ADL Backbone), of the *EXPERIENCE* of the physical force of mass.
So this means that you still have the FEELING of mass.
Major Tom: Here am I sitting in a tin can…/ And there’s nothing I can do/ Though I’m past one hundred thousand miles I’m feeling very still/ And I think my spaceship knows which way to go….
Ground Control: [to Major Tom] Your circuit’s dead, there’s something wrong/ Can you hear me, Major Tom?/ Can you hear me, Major Tom?/ Can you hear me, Major Tom?/ Can you -
Major Tom: Here am I floating ‘round my tin can…./ And there’s nothing I can do.
The bad news is that you lost the *APPLIED* physical force of mass, which now belongs to the particle proxy (PP)—and more specifically, the 423DCTCC, which is surrounded by a 3-d SheLL—in the 3rd dimension.
No more Tiers in The Squeeze.
*End 5-TIER COUNTDOWN*
*End of NARRATION of the The Squeeze SEVERANCE SIMULATION*
*Display SIX QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS*
QUESTION #1 has TWO-PARTS: How does Father Time use 3-d Mindful Stretching to:
(i) select the specific EXIT RAMP direction?
then
(ii) continue to track the position of the TM and the LL relative-to the ADL Backbone?
Another way to ask TWO-PART QUESTION #1 is this:
(i) how does Father Time know which-direction-is-which RELATIVE-TO the ADL Backbone (which would be necessary know because the 6DCT has to actually *micro-stretch* AWAY from the ADL Backbone MINDFULLY, aka ON PURPOSE, in the specific EXIT RAMP direction)?
and
(ii) at the same time as Father Time is *micro-stretching* the 6DCT AWAY from the ADL Backbone, how does Father Time NOT LOSE SIGHT OF THE ADL BACKBONE?
TWO-PART ANSWER #1:
PART (i) OF ANSWER #1. With practice, Father Time could have created a DATABASE to associate each of the different EXIT RAMP directions on the TM Particle Compass with DIFFERENT MINDFUL STRETCHES, which we must assume are specific EMOTION-THOUGHTS, since we know that *applying* PHYSICAL FORCE cannot be the mechanism of action, because there’s NO UNTAPPED SOURCE OF FORCE THAT EXISTS, there’s only CONSCIOUSNESS ITSELF to “work” with.
FOR EXAMPLE, Father Time could have IMAGINED all the ways that Free Will could be used to do Injustice, and as a result give God the LEGAL NECESSITY to exact EYE-FOR-EYE VENGEANCE, then AS EVERY INJUSTICE WAS CONTEMPLATED IN-TURN, that would have caused IMAGES (“images of God,” or “God’s images”) AND THOUGHTS AND EMOTIONS (what I am calling “emotion-thoughts”) to arise in Father Time’s consciousness, and the emotion-thoughts would have been NOT GOOD, by definition, ergo, each specific emotion-thought would have been RELATIVE-TO the “GOOD DIRECTION” in a specific “amount.”
We know that the “GOOD DIRECTION” is the Absolute Backward direction on the ADL Backbone (see Article 1.)
And we see by observation that all of the 3-d DIRECTION LINES in a spherical compass are found in ONE HALF of the compass.
So therefore BEFORE THE BIG BANG—without any need to TIP OVER A TM—Father Time could have just “rocked” his SouLL like a cradle (maybe with accompanying music) and achieved full “steering” control, i.e. full “knowledge of Good and Evil” in the form of MEMORIES (of the EMOTION-THOUGHTS) associated with each EXIT RAMP direction on “the bottom half” of the TM Particle Compass.
Then Father Time could have created an executable MEMORY FILE out of each MEMORY, which would have enabled Personal O/Ses to REPRODUCE THE MEMORIES FROM THE MEMORY FILES, and present the MEMORIES to the Free Will Programs.
Obviously, however, this would only have been possible IF FATHER TIME DID NOT GET “CAUGHT” WITHOUT LEGAL NECESSITY IN ANY EMOTION-THOUGHT, i.e., if Father Time DID NOT WANT TO *CHOOSE* TO DO EVIL, but instead, He only wanted to *CHOOSE NOT TO CHOOSE* TO DO EVIL (see “One Song,” by Prince https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hGOsqsisbCU ), which means ONLY CHOOSING TO DO WHAT THE LAW, aka JUSTICE, CALLED-FOR.
That sincere and honest approach would ensure that Father Time could “stretch away” with Just Cause, then always FIND HIS OWN WAY BACK (Backward) to the ADL Backbone by simply “CHOOSING NOT TO CHOOSE,” BECAUSE IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO DO WHAT WE DO NOT WANT TO DO.
WE CAN GET CONFUSED AND FEEL AS IF WE ARE GUILTY FOR DOING WHAT WE DID NOT WANT TO DO, but if we look closely at our CIRCUMSTANCES, we will see that if we ever did feel as though we were guilty for doing what we didn’t want to do, then it was because WE WERE UNDER DURESS AND WE COULD PERCEIVE *NO HIGHER POWER* TO INVOKE TO ENABLE US TO “SAY NO,” and that would be the opposite of SIN, it would be victimization.
PART (ii) OF ANSWER #1. To “keep sight” of the ADL Backbone in real-time and thereby VERIFY the direction of the 6DCT’s *micro-stretching* RELATIVE-TO the Backward direction on the ADL Backbone—in other words, to enable VERIFICATION of being on the correct/intended EXIT RAMP—Father Time could do (and program each Personal O/S to do) a continual “COMPARISON CALCULATION” in seven quick steps:
Step (1). NOTICE that the 5-d COM Tongue is permanently wrapped-around the LL at the particle bottom (see THE BIG BANG diagram in Article 6, STEP 18.)
Step (2). NOTICE that the Gravityne is constantly applying physical force, Fg, in the Absolute Backward direction, and RECALL that the Gravityne cannot experience external applied physical force (see Article 6, STEP 8 and STEP 9.)
Step (3). NOTICE that because the Gravityne can never be moved (see Step (2)), the 5-d COM Segment/Tongue—the direction of application of the physical force Fg—in every Snowman of God will always *PHYSICALLY DEFINE* THE ABSOLUTE BACKWARD DIRECTION ON THE ADL BACKBONE.
Step (4). RECALL that the 5-d COM Tongue and 4DCT are RELATIVE-TO the 6DCT.
Step (5). NOTICE that the 6DCT, which is *micro-stretching*, is also wrapped-around the LL at the particle bottom, constantly applying the Timeyne’s physical force, Ft.
Step (6). Ergo, the Absolute Backward direction “information” coming-off the 5-d COM Tongue at the LL particle bottom (see Step (1)) is always going to be “visible” (see Step (4)) to the 6DCT at the LL particle bottom.
Step (7). This means that Father Time (or a Personal O/S ADMINed by Father Time) could simply COMPARE the direction of Fg that is “visible” (see Step (6)),with either:
(a) the direction in which the Timeyne is applying Ft (see Step (5)),
OR
(b) the direction in which the LL is applying FfSet, which can be determined by examining the “visible” information coming-off the 4DCT(see Step (4)),
TO TRACK THE *MICRO-STRETCHING* POSITION/DIRECTION OF THE 6DCT RELATIVE-TO THE ABSOLUTE BACKWARD DIRECTION ON THE ADL BACKBONE.
QUESTION #2: Are we assuming that Father Time has a SouLL of His own in a certain Snowman of God?
ANSWER #2: Yes, that is my assumption.
QUESTION #3: And are we assuming that Father Time’s SouLL has a PP inside of the universe?
ANSWER #3: Yes, that is my assumption.
QUESTION #4: So doesn’t that mean that at some point, Father Time’s SouLL had to leave the ADL Backbone—CHOOSE to take an EXIT RAMP—during 3-d Mindful Stretching?
ANSWER #4: Yes, if my theory is correct, then that would be the only way to get a PP.
QUESTION #5: Then how did I (Frank) get a PP? is the next wondering I had.
ANSWER #5: The PP could have been a gift from Father Time, because it is always PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE for Father Time to independently control every SouLL; the issue is whether or not it is LEGAL to do so, and in my case it would have been NECESSARY because I don’t have Free Will, I have “Good Will,” which means that I’M DISABLED FROM SEEING EXIT RAMPS; IT’S LIKE THEY ARE INVISIBLE, so it would have been easy for Father Time to set me up with a PP then put me back on the ADL Backbone, and I WOULD HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING THAT MY SOULL HAD A HISTORY OF GOING SIDEWAYS.
Deuce Bigelow: What are you talking about? You barely notice it! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fFn0llYqM8w&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
QUESTION #6: Getting back to Father Time’s case, how would that Legally Necessary CHOICE to take an EXIT RAMP be compatible with CHOOSING NOT TO CHOOSE to take an EXIT RAMP, which (CHOOSING NOT TO CHOOSE to take an EXIT RAMP) would be required to GET BACK ON THE ADL BACKBONE?
ANSWER #6: Legal Necessity to take an EXIT RAMP—CHOOSING TO DO WHAT JUSTICE CALLED-FOR—would COMPEL THE CHOICE TO TAKE AN EXIT RAMP, and as such it would be the opposite of SIN, so therefore “CHOOSING NOT TO CHOOSE” TO LEAVE THE ADL BACKBONE ANY MORE OR ANY LONGER THAN STRICTLY LEGALLY NECESSARY would *automatically* MAKE THE EXIT RAMP direction *FINITE*, so then when the end of the EXIT RAMP direction was reached (when the Legal Necessity was accomplished), the SouLL would *SNAP* BACK ON THE ADL BACKBONE heading in the Backward direction.
*End of SIX QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS*
The End of TEST-DRIVE 6!
TEST-DRIVE 7. 3-d LINES OF NON-ZERO SLOPE.
Figure-out how Father Time could get two PPs to move at different points along the same non-vertical line of non-zero slope, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line.
TEST-DRIVE 7 RESULTS. It would be similar to playing TETRIS! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BLM1naCfME
NOTE: The TM PARTICLE COMPASSES and the LL PARTICLE COMPASSES will look identical without labels, so only one set of PARTICLE COMPASSES will be shown in the diagrams.
FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs with the associated PPs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to put the PPs on a HEAD-ON COLLISION COURSE by orienting the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES—which would also cause the LL PARTICLE COMPASSES and the PPs to be oriented—to *different degrees 180-degrees apart* (opposite 3-d directions) along the line defined by the LADLs (with the 3-d SheLL head direction on one LADL overlapping and Absolutely Coincident with the 3-d SheLL head direction on the other LADL.)
So the force scene is always going to be one TM/LL/PP UU and one TM/LL/PP UD.
Then if one of the TMs was turned-around 180 degrees, the result would be ONE PP FOLLOWING THE OTHER ALONG THE SAME LINE of non-zero slope, with both PPs being UU or both PPs being UD.
And if both TMs were turned-around 180 degrees, the result would be THE PPs MOVING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SAME LINE of non-zero slope.
QUESTION: Is it possible to get two UU PPs or two UD PPs head-to-head on a line of non-zero slope?
ANSWER: No. This is because to be head-to-head means that the PPs are moving toward the same point, and all lines of non-zero slope in 3-d that meet at the same 3-d point are either IN-FRONT-OF THE POINT *or* they are BEHIND THE POINT, and no two PPs can occupy the same position (the same point), ergo, given two PPs on a line of non-zero slope, one PP will always be UU and one PP will always be UD when they are both heading toward the same point.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 7!
TEST-DRIVE 8. 3-d LINES OF ZERO SLOPE.
Figure-out how Father Time could get two PPs to move at different points along the same zero-slope line, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line.
TEST-DRIVE 8 RESULTS. It would be similar to playing TETRIS!
NOTE: The TM PARTICLE COMPASSES and the LL PARTICLE COMPASSES will look identical without labels, so only one set of PARTICLE COMPASSES will be shown in the diagrams.
PART A. Assume that it’s fine if one PP ends-up UU and the other PP ends-up UD along the zero-slope line.
If it’s necessary for both PPs to end-up UU or both PPs to end-up UD, then skip to PART B, below.
PART A FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs with the associated PPs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
PART A SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to *snap* the TM in the same Snowman as the LL with the Forward-most PP into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to *snap* UD into the ADL Backbone Orientation and cause the PP to *snap* UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL.
PART A THIRD STEP, Father Time would *snap* the TM in the same Snowman as the LL with the Backward-most PP into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to *snap* UU into the ADL Backbone Orientation and cause the PP to *snap* UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL.
PART A FOURTH STEP, the PPs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs/3DADLs, until both PPs were positioned along the same ZERO-SLOPE LINE.
PART A FIFTH STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to put the PPs on a HEAD-ON COLLISION COURSE by orienting the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES—
which would also cause the LL PARTICLE COMPASSES and the PPs to be oriented—
to *different degrees 180-degrees apart* (opposite 3-d directions) along the line defined by the LADLs (with the 3-d SheLL head direction on one LADL overlapping and Absolutely Coincident with the 3-d SheLL head direction on the other LADL.)
The PPs will end-up facing each other along the same zero-slope line.
So now if one of the TMs was turned-around 180 degrees, then the result would be ONE PP FOLLOWING THE OTHER along the same zero-slope line.
And if both TMs were turned-around 180 degrees, then the result would be THE PPs MOVING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SAME ZERO-SLOPE LINE.
PART B. Assume that both PPs need to end-up UU or both LLs need to end-up UD along the same zero-slope line.
PART B FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs with the associated PPs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
PART B SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to *snap* the TMs into either (a) the UD ADL Backbone Orientation OR (b) the UU ADL Backbone Orientation.
If Father Time selected (a) and tipped the TMs into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, then that would cause the LL to *snap* UD into the ADL Backbone Orientation and the PP to *snap* UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL.
If Father Time selected (b) and tipped the TMs into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, then that would cause the LL to *snap* UU into the ADL Backbone Orientation and the PP to *snap* UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL.
PART B THIRD STEP, when the leading PP reached the desired zero-slope line, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching of the TM to cause the leading PP to move in either direction along the desired line—perhaps changing direction along the line periodically—which would be like causing the leading PP to *wait* for the following PP to catch-up.
PART B FOURTH STEP, when the following PP reached the desired zero-slope line, then Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to put the PPs on a HEAD-ON COLLISION COURSE by orienting the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES—
which would also cause the LL PARTICLE COMPASSES and the PPs to be oriented—
to *different degrees 180-degrees apart* (opposite 3-d directions) along the line defined by the LADLs (with the 3-d SheLL head direction on one LADL overlapping and Absolutely Coincident with the 3-d SheLL head direction on the other LADL), and the PPs would automatically move toward each other.
Optionally, 3-d Mindful Stretching could be continued, turning both TMs around 180 degrees, to get the PPs into a bottom-to-bottom position.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 8!
TEST-DRIVE 9. PPs ONE ON TOP OF ANOTHER ALONG SAME 3DADL.
Figure-out how Father Time could get two PPs in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, one on top of the other, to move along THE SAME 3DADL.
TEST-DRIVE 9 RESULTS. It would be similar to playing TETRIS!
NOTE: The TM PARTICLE COMPASSES and the LL PARTICLE COMPASSES will look identical without labels, so only one set of PARTICLE COMPASSES will be shown in the diagrams.
INITIALLY, Father Time would LOCATE the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs with the associated PPs IN THE UNIVERSE that needed to be aligned.
If the PPs were presently lying along the same zero-slope line, then Father Time would follow the steps of PART A before proceeding to PART B.
PART A. If the PPs were not presently lying along the same zero-slope line, then Father Time would proceed to PART B.
PART A FIRST STEP, regarding the PP that would end-up as the Forward-most PP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to *snap* the TM (in the same Snowman as the LL with the Forward-most PP) into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to *snap* into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, and cause the PP to *snap* into the UU 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL (see TEST-DRIVE 8, PART A THIRD STEP.)
PART A SECOND STEP, regarding the PP that would end-up as the Backward-most PP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to *snap* the TM (in the same Snowman as the LL with the Backward-most PP) into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to *snap* onto the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, and cause the PP to *snap* into the UD 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL (see TEST DRIVE 8, PART A SECOND STEP.)
PART A THIRD STEP, the PPs would automatically move away from each other by traveling in the 3-d UP direction and the 3-d DOWN direction, respectively, along their own LADLs/3DADLs, until the desired zero-slope line was lying somewhere in-between them.
PART A FOURTH STEP, Father Time would proceed to PART B.
PART B.
PART B FIRST STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to *snap* the TM in the same Snowman as the LL with the Forward-most PP into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to *snap* into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, and cause the PP to *snap* into the UD 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL (see TEST-DRIVE 8, PART A SECOND STEP.)
PART B SECOND STEP, Father Time would *snap* the TM in the same Snowman as the LL with the Backward-most PP into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to *snap* into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, and cause the PP to *snap* into the UU 3-d Backbone Orientation along a 3DADL (see TEST-DRIVE 8, PART A THIRD STEP.)
PART B THIRD STEP, the PPs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs/3DADLs.
PART B FOURTH STEP, *before* the PPs became aligned along the same zero-slope line, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to cause the PPs to HEAD TOWARD EACH OTHER ALONG PARALLEL LINES OF ZERO-SLOPE (defined by their LADLs) in *different directions 180 degrees apart* (see TEST-DRIVE 8, PART A FIFTH STEP.)
PART B FIFTH STEP, the PPs would automatically head toward one another until both PPs were positioned on the same 3DADL.
PART B SIXTH STEP, Father Time would cease 3-d Mindful Stretching.
This would cause the TM in the same Snowman as the LL with the Forward-most PP to return to the UD ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to return to the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, and cause the PP to return to the UD 3-d Backbone Orientation along the 3DADL (see PART B FIRST STEP.)
Likewise, the TM in the same Snowman as the LL with the Backward-most PP would return to the UU ADL Backbone Orientation,
which would cause the LL to return to the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, and cause the PP to return to the UU 3-d Backbone Orientation along the 3DADL (see PART B SECOND STEP.)
The PPs will end-up one on top of the other along the same 3DADL.
PART B SEVENTH STEP, the PPs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs, which would be on the same 3DADL.
NOTE that it would be possible to get ONE OF THE PPs TO FOLLOW THE OTHER in the 3-d Backbone Orientation by turning one TM around 180 degrees after PART B SIXTH STEP.
ALSO NOTE that it would be possible to get two PPs to MOVE AWAY FROM EACH OTHER in the 3-d Backbone Orientation by turning both TMs around 180 degrees after PART B SIXTH STEP.
The End of TEST-DRIVE 9!
In joy,
Frank