Article 8, Part 1 of 2. MAKING AN APPLE PIE FROM SCRATCH in Frank’s Kitchen Counter Home Physics Thought Laboratory: THE ATOM SKELETON RECIPE ft. STRONG NUCLEAR BONDS

NOTICE: THIS IS A (VERY) ROUGH DRAFT; THE ARTICLE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION; SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES ARE ONGOING

PREFACE

True Science Story. 

It happened on September 26, 2025. 

My car battery died, and I called AAA for a jump-start. 

I was so frazzled that when I wrote the directions to my house, I got left and right mixed-up and I told the service provider that I was the fifth house on the left instead of the fifth house on the right.

And the worst thing about the event was that I sat there in my kitchen counter home physics thought laboratory and I thought about which side of the street my house is on. 

I got it wrong. 

I have no inherent sense of direction and I never have.

Nevertheless, I have more of an acquired sense of direction than modern science.

In the immortal words of Elizabeth Zott (“Lessons in Chemistry” https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=549072441268687): This is revolting.

I’m talking about A REVOLUTION, in other words—in Tracy Chapman’s words on the record turn-table—which may or may not sound like a whisper, I suppose that’s going to depend-on the identity of the listener, but one thing’s for certain: It’s not going to sound like Godless Conventional Wisdom’s same-old broken records.

And when we get THE ATOM RECIPE, then it’s all over. 

Then it’s all icing on the apple pie, it’s all downhill skiing on a beautiful mountain—it’s downwind sailing with the current, it’s surfing an endless wave—from “there.”

And we’re going to get “there” in Article 8. 

So stay with me, if you dare, to witness the forest come into view and to see that all of the trees are friends to meet not obstacles to lay to waste.

WHERE WERE WE?

Before now, we traveled quite a distance away from Conventional Wisdom. 

So let’s file a brief TRIP REPORT, to which we can refer-back throughout Article 8 and beyond, as we continue our trek into uncharted territory and leave even more conventional pearls of wisdom behind, curious as a Cheshire Cat—knowing, not concerned or cynical—about the fact that the pearls are no doubt being CLUTCHED ever-tighter in royal societies, because all the formal gowns and crowns would look naked without them.

TRIP REPORT

Trip Report Entry 1.

In Article 1, we proved God’s multi-dimensional existence. We discovered that God’s existence, in turn, proves that different dimensions must be MUTUALLY-EXCLUSIVE, which means that lower-dimensions are RELATIVE-TO (meaning DEPENDENT-ON) higher-dimensions, but not vice-versa.

Let’s do a quick 4-point Q&A to get a better feel for the RELEVANCE of the mutual exclusivity of different dimensions.

Q1: What 4-d, 5-d or 6-d POSITIONS or DIRECTIONS are in 3-d?

A1: Empty set. Lower-dimensions must be RELATIVE-TO higher-dimensions, but not vice-versa. Ergo, 3-d must be devoid of 4-d, 5-d and 6-d POSITIONS and DIRECTIONS.

Q2: What 3-d POSITIONS or DIRECTIONS are in 4-d, 5-d or 6-d?

A2: Empty set. Dimensions are MUTUALLY-EXCLUSIVE, so each dimension must be devoid of POSITIONS and DIRECTIONS in the other dimensions.

Q3: From what POSITIONS or DIRECTIONS in 3-d can the POSITIONS or DIRECTIONS in 4-d, 5-d, or 6-d be “reached”?

A3: Empty set. From the POV of the 3rd dimension, a higher-dimension CANNOT EVEN BE SEEN, let alone “reached,” because the higher-dimension is ABSOLUTE and the 3rd dimension is RELATIVE-TO the higher-dimension.

Q4: From what POSITIONS or DIRECTIONS in 4-d, 5-d and 6-d can the POSITIONS or DIRECTIONS in 3-d be “reached”?

A4: *All* POSITIONS and DIRECTIONS in 4-d, 5-d and 6-d can “reach” *all* POSITIONS and DIRECTIONS in 3-d. This is because the 3rd-dimension is RELATIVE-TO the 4th dimension, the 5th dimension and the 6th dimension.

Trip Report Entry 2. 

In Article 2, we bid DEATH adieu.

As Emily Dickinson wrote:

“Because I could not stop for Death — He kindly stopped for me —

The Carriage held but just Ourselves — And Immortality.

We slowly drove — He knew no haste And I had put away My labor and my leisure too, For His Civility —

We passed the School, where Children strove At Recess — in the Ring — 

We passed the Fields of Gazing Grain — 

We passed the Setting Sun —

Or rather — He passed Us —

The Dews drew quivering and Chill — For only Gossamer, my Gown — My Tippet — Only Tulle —

We paused before a House that seemed A swelling of the Ground —

The Roof was scarcely visible —The Cornice — in the Ground —

Since then — ‘tis Centuries — and yet Feels shorter than the Day I first surmised the Horses’ Heads Were toward Eternity”

Trip Report Entry 3.

In Article 3, we watched a few minutes of a silent movie made in 1923, then we followed the movie’s advice, imagining ourselves captaining ships on opposite poles of the earth, raising and lowering the ships’ flags to get a feel for the way direction works. 

But looking-at the flags and having the proof of God (see Trip Report Entry 1), we suddenly saw that ALBERT EINSTEIN WAS WRONG about there being no “up” or “down” out in space! 

So we documented our findings about direction, then we applied our findings to explain a few things about matter, which we had not one clue how to make, but yet could not deny that there wasn’t any other way for matter to *behave* in light of what we had figured-out about “up” and “down” being ABSOLUTE, NOT RELATIVE, out in space.

Trip Report Entry 4.

In Article 4, we began our quest to get the Theory of Everything Without Commercials MOVING in the right direction.

WITH ZENO, author of the famed “Zeno’s Paradoxes,” as our guide, we figuratively stepped into “Bill and Ted’s” shoes, taking a most excellent adventure through the annals of history, meeting famous theoretical physicists of old, and putting their theories of motion to the Zeno’s Paradox “Tortoise and Hare” test. 

Zeno’s Paradox “Tortoise and Hare” test reveals that it’s impossible to *start moving* to *a destination* by thinking—doing math—because a *travel distance* can always be *divided* into smaller increments.

So quiet as it’s kept, ZENO PROVED that a theory of motion must state A PHYSICAL CAUSE for motion’s *beginning*, or else the theory FLUNKS ZENO’S PARADOX “Tortoise and Hare” TEST, and is therefore AN INVALID THEORY.

Finally, with Zeno’s help, we showed that in all of world history, there has never been even one VALID theory of motion! 

But we also noticed that Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion COULD BECOME VALID with some TLC…‘cause we don’t want No Scrubs like the other guys.

Don’t go chasing waterfalls. It’s still water even if it’s moving.

Trip Report Entry 5.

In Article 5, we deduced that the Eternality of God is the one-and-only fact that enables a theory of motion to bust Zeno’s Paradox and pass the “Tortoise and Hare” test. 

This is because God’s Eternality reveals that *motion itself is Eternal*, with every particle of God having a constant mandate to “haul mass” via the expression of the particle’s Natural force of mass (or “Fmass” for short), which is expressed as wave-particle duality (meaning equal amounts of wave-energy, aka mass, and physical force in opposite directions) along the same line. 

Then we also noticed that there is one line, which we called the Absolute Direction Line, or “ADL” for short, connecting each “center of mass” (or “COM” for short), of each of the three different dimensions of God. 

This means that one particle in each dimension of God will always be lined-up along the same line.

We kept calling those individual lines “ADLs,” noting that the individual ADLs must all be RELATIVE-TO the COM of the 6th and highest dimension of God, as if the individual ADLs are BACKBONES OF MARSHMALLOW SNOWMEN MADE-OF THREE PARTICLES INSTEAD OF THREE MARSHMALLOWS. 

And so we named the particles in each dimension (Lumeynes are in the 4th dimension, Gravitynes are in the 5th dimension and Timeynes are in the 6th dimension), and we began to call one set of three particles lined-up along the same ADL a “Snowman of God.” 

Then we re-envisioned God as being made-of Snowmen of God all lined-up next to each other in A SPHERICAL ARRANGEMENT. 

We know this must be correct because the spherical shape would guarantee EQUALITY of distance and physical structure between every particle in the same dimension of God and the 6th dimension COM at the center of the sphere.

But we can’t “see inside” of a multi-dimensional sphere, we can only see THE SURFACE, which is the 3-d UNIVERSE. 

And in fact, we can actually only see the ATOMIC MATTER part of atoms in the universe, since we know (see Article 3) that the COM part of every atom must be BEHIND the Atomic Matter part of the atom. 

And so from our POV of “being Atomic Matter” looking toward the COM of an atom, it always appears to us as if the COM part of an atom is INSIDE of the Atomic Mass part.

So WE HAD TO IMPROVISE, imagining that we could cut the sphere of Snowmen of God—with the UNIVERSE at the sphere’s surface—into two pieces diagonally, from top-to-bottom, and peer “down into” the sphere.

We got a ”half decent” view!

Trip Report Entry 6.

In Article 6, we discovered that particles are like tax-paying turtles living in God’s Country, which is a Totalitarian state with a 100% tax rate, with tax payable in wave-energy (mass) upon-receipt of two receivables. 

Receivable (i) is the internal force of mass, Fmass, which hauls mass in an “idling,” or “inertial,” state by spinning the particle right round or left round like a Tippe Top. 

So the tax paid on Receivable (i) is the EM wave-energy emission that Naturally occurs out of the particle bottom as the particle expresses wave-particle duality along the ADL. 

And it is actually the EM wave-energy being THRUST out of the particle bottom that CAUSES the top, or head, of the particle to *apply physical force* in the opposite direction along the ADL—and more specifically, to rotate around the ADL in a fixed direction—which is how the particle “idles.” 

Receivable (ii) is external *applied physical force*, which is like a “moving service” received from another turtle particle—a moving service provider—that helps the particle to which the external physical force is applied “get into gear” and haul mass in the same direction in which the moving service provider is heading.

So the tax paid on Receivable (ii) is the equal-and-opposite EM wave-energy emission that is generated to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in *reaction* to experiencing a physical force *action*. 

And it is actually the EM wave-energy being THRUST out of the particle that CAUSES the top, or head, of the particle to *apply physical force* in the opposite direction, which is why the particle “gets into gear” and hauls mass in the same direction as the moving service provider. 

We coined the term “Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics,” or “TPTPTP” for short, to refer-to the nuts-and-bolts of the Theory of Everything Without Commercials. 

The TPTPTP is like THE ENGINE of a vehicle, which can, in theory, TAKE US EVERYWHERE WE WANT TO GO IN THE UNIVERSE AND INSIDE OF GOD!

The first place we went was the “control room” (the COM) of the 6th dimension Father Time part of God. 

Recalling the movie “Lucy,” we emulated Lucy in her swivel chair—the Tippe Top chair, in fact, we now know—“turning around” and causing the world to “rewind” to the NOW of her choosing.

OUR PURPOSE for hacking-into Father Time’s “control room” was to WAKE THE SLEEPING GIANT, or in other words, to show how the TPTPTP explains the Big Bang as being the result of particles in the 4th-dimension going from one state (“in bed” in THE SLEEPING GIANT) to another state (“out of bed” at THE BIG BANG) because of a decision made by Father Time to do some 3-d Mindful Stretching of some 6-d COM Segments, which tipped-over previously upside-down Timeynes, thereby causing the Lumeynes in the same Snowmen of God to tip-over, too, and begin moving in “Forward gear” at the speed of light.

We examined THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram in Article 6, STEP 10:

We considered THE BIG BANG diagram in Article 6, STEP 18:

NOTE that in both diagrams, SPACE is a reference to the EM wave-energy that is Eternally being dumped by a Lumeyne through the open door in the infinite 4-d Forward direction, NOT a reference to the 3-d universe.

Trip Report Entry 7.

In Article 7, we used the TPTPTP engine to get ourselves a one-way ticket out of “heaven,” creating a manual (which we called “Emmanuel,” since it is an online manual) to document the series of NINE TEST-DRIVES we took with post-Big-Bang LUMEYNES.

We saw that after a Big Bang event, which causes a Lumeyne to break loose from its “parking spot” in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram—becoming a Loose Lumeyne, or “LL,” capable of experiencing and applying its physical force, FfSet, in the 3-d directions of a spherical compass (which we called “EXIT RAMP directions”)—a 3-d particle proxy (“PP”) having a spherical 3-d SheLL automatically pops-up inside of the universe the first time an LL applies FfSet in an EXIT RAMP direction. 

Then one 4-d LL and one 3-d PP together form an artificial sub-atomic particle (“SAP”) that we’re calling a “SybiLL.” 

The 3-d PP parts of SybiLL SAPs move around the universe at the speed of light, with EACH 3-d PP PRECISELY TRACKING THE *EXPERIENCE* OF ITS ASSOCIATED 4-d LL IN THE 4th DIMENSION by *applying* FfSet at the 3-d SheLL head—and more specifically, FfSet is applied by the PP4DCT in the 423DCTCC inside of the 3-d SheLL—in whatever 3-d direction the LL’s head is pointing. 

We saw (see Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 4) that if the LL is in the ADL Backbone Orientation (with the LL’s head pointing in either the Absolute Forward direction or the Absolute Backward direction along the ADL Backbone), then the PP will be in the analogous 3-d Backbone Orientation (with the 3-d SheLL head pointing in either the 3-d Up direction or the 3-d Down direction, respectively.)

This was an important observation, because when the LL is in the ADL Backbone Orientation (instead of of *experiencing* FfSet in an EXIT RAMP direction), then the LL is not relative-to the PP, but the PP remains relative-to the LL. 

This is because all 3-d directions—all directions in which the PP can *apply* FfSet inside of the universe—are RELATIVE-TO the Absolute Forward direction and Absolute Backward direction along the ADL Backbone, where the LL is *experiencing* FfSet in the 4th dimension. 

So then in that case—when the LL is *snapped* onto the ADL Backbone, which is what we call being in the ADL Backbone Orientation—then WHAT HAPPENS TO THE PP IN 3-d STAYS IN 3-d AND CANNOT CAUSE THE LL TO TILT IN ANY EXIT RAMP DIRECTION, which ensures that if the PP is “forced” out of the 3-d Backbone Orientation by another PP, then after the force is over, the PP will automatically *snap* back into the original 3-d Backbone Orientation along a new 3DADL!

RECALL the SouLL discussion from Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 5, and NOTE that the same principles apply to garden-variety LLs:

We also saw (see Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 6) that the direction in which the LL’s head is pointing can be fully controlled by Father Time (or a Personal O/S ADMINed by Father Time) via 3-d Mindful Stretching, and in particular, by putting The Squeeze on the 6DCT at the Timeyne particle/COM attachment position.  

We specifically demonstrated (see Article 7, TEST-DRIVES 7, 8 and 9) how The Squeeze could be used used to orient LLs in a manner that causes their EMPTY 3-d SheLLs to be aligned along the same 3-d lines.

Finally, we realized (see Article 7, TEST-DRIVE 3) that the ability of light particles (LLs) to align along 3-d lines and indirectly apply MOVING SERVICES to each other via their massless PPs—which means via COLLISIONS between EMPTY 3-d SheLLs inside of the universe—explains how and why 4-d light particles (LLs) could ORGANIZE INTO ATOMS without encountering the unsolvable “entanglement” problem that Quantum Physics has with the photon theory of light. 

But that’s as far as we went in Article 7; we did not explore any specific COLLISIONS between EMPTY 3-d SheLLs aligned along the same 3-d lines. 

The End of the TRIP REPORT!

NOW HERE WE ARE, IN ARTICLE 8, Part 1.

We’re going to enter SybiLL SAPs into TEST-COLLISIONS and document the results in the Emmanuel for the purpose of forming stable ATOM SKELETONS that are held-together by FORCIBLY UNBREAKABLE STRONG NUCLEAR BONDS.